TO THE EDITOR:
The differentiation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells into the various cell lineages is regulated by the progenitors’ microenvironment and cell-intrinsic factors,1-3 including transcription factors and transcriptional modulators. The cell-intrinsic factors that regulate mast cell differentiation have primarily been studied in mouse hematopoiesis.4-6 An elegant example is the antagonistic regulation of MITF and C/EBPα, transcription factors that determine whether bipotent basophil/mast cell progenitors form mast cells or basophils.7 Technological advancements in genetic editing, including the CRISPR/Cas9 system, offer an attractive solution to knockout genes of interest in human hematopoietic progenitors, thus allowing for studies of the genes’ role in human hematopoiesis. Here, we aimed to develop a framework that allows for investigation into the role of individual transcription factors and transcriptional modulators in human mast cell differentiation.
We first optimized the CRISPR/Cas9-based method by genetically disrupting the PTPRC gene in hematopoietic progenitors from peripheral blood (supplemental Methods). The PTPRC gene encodes the cell surface protein CD45, which allows for a simple flow cytometry–based readout of the editing efficiency after culture. Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) of Cas9 and single guide RNA (sgRNA) targeting the PTPRC gene8 were prepared and delivered to 2-day cultured hematopoietic progenitors through electroporation (Figure 1A). Titration with increasing amounts of Cas9 RNP showed that the editing efficiency reaches a plateau at 840 pmol, achieving a mean editing efficiency of 74.8% with no or little effect on cell survival (Figure 1B-C; supplemental Figure 1). Therefore, the 840 pmol or 960 pmol amount of Cas9 RNP was used in the following experiments unless otherwise specified in the figure legends. To assess the editing efficiency in mast cells derived from CD34+ progenitors, we cultured the RNP-treated cells for 11 to 12 days after electroporation. Flow cytometry analysis revealed a mean editing efficiency of 66% in the c-Kithi FcεRI+ mast cells across 5 independent experiments (Figure 1D-E). Thus, the results demonstrate that CRISPR/Cas9–based gene editing can efficiently knock out a gene of interest in hematopoietic progenitors that are differentiating to cells of the mast cell lineage.
To identify candidate regulators of human mast cell differentiation, we analyzed a single-cell transcriptomics data set of human hematopoietic progenitors.9 Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) visualization of the data revealed that the mast cell progenitor (MCP) population expressed the transcription factor MITF to a higher extent than multipotent progenitors (MPPs, Figure 1F). Therefore, we hypothesized that MITF drives the formation of mast cells in human hematopoiesis. To knock out MITF in CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors, 2 unique sgRNAs were designed to target near the 5’end of MITF (supplemental Figure 2A). We validated the editing efficiency of MITF 5 days after electroporation using an established Sanger sequencing–based approach, which has been developed to genotype cells in situations in which a flow cytometry–based readout to assess the presence or absence of a target is difficult or impossible.10 Analysis of sorted live cells showed an overall gene knockout efficiency of 62% for MITF sgRNA1 and 67% for MITF sgRNA2, indicating that MITF was successfully targeted (Figure 1G-I). Flow cytometry analysis 12 days after the gene editing event revealed a lower frequency of mast cells in MITF-targeted cells than control cells (Figure 1G,J). These data supported the hypothesis that MITF is important for human mast cell formation. Because a low frequency of mast cells was present 12 days after electroporation (Figure 1G), we investigated the genotype of the non-mast cell and the mast cell populations specifically. As expected, sorted non-mast cells showed a high degree of frameshift mutations in MITF, which disrupt the translation of the MITF RNA (Figure 1K). By contrast, we observed a low fraction of sequences with frameshift mutations in the mast cell population (Figure 1Kii). The low mast cell frequency and low fraction of mast cells with MITF frameshift mutations highlight that hematopoietic progenitors that have escaped the gene editing event are the main contributors to the mast cell population, stressing the importance of MITF for human mast cell formation.
We performed 2 additional experiments to investigate the effect of knocking out MITF in FcεRI– progenitors and MCPs (supplemental Figure 2B).9 Analysis of the editing efficiency showed successful gene editing 5 days after electroporation from the 2 starting populations (supplemental Figure 2C). Knocking out MITF in sorted FcεRI– progenitors and MCPs resulted in a lower frequency of mast cells on day 12 than the corresponding control wild-type progenitors in both experiments (Figure 1L). The low number of mast cells after culture in the knockout conditions made it difficult to assess the genotype of the remaining cells 12 days after gene editing (Figure 1L). Still, we were able to quantify the editing efficiency in the mast cell population in one of the experiments (supplemental Figure 2D). Notably, the sequencing data from this experiment showed that the mast cells at day 12 had a low degree of frameshift mutations, especially among mast cells derived from the sorted MCP population (supplemental Figure 2D). These results reiterate that mainly cells that have escaped the gene editing event form mast cells. Taken together, the results show that MITF is important for the human mast cell differentiation.
Single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis of hematopoietic progenitors revealed that the gene expression of the transcriptional modulator CITED2 is gradually increasing along the MPP to MCP differentiation trajectory (Figure 2A).9 This observation prompted us to investigate the role of CITED2 for the formation of mast cells. Three sgRNA targeting near the 5’ end of CITED2 were designed (supplemental Figure 3). CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors were subjected to CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing, and sorted live cells were analyzed on day 5 for editing efficiency. CITED2 sgRNA1 showed a high degree of editing (supplemental Figure 3C) and was therefore used in subsequent experiments. Targeting CITED2 in the hematopoietic progenitor population did not reduce the mast cell frequency (Figure 2B-D; supplemental Figure 3B-D). Instead, there was a trend that the knockout of CITED2 results in an increased mast cell frequency (Figure 2D; supplemental Figure 3D), highlighting that mast cells are formed in the absence of CITED2. The Sanger sequencing analysis revealed successful knockout of CITED2 in the mast cell population (90.5 % [mean] frameshift mutations), further highlighting that mast cell differentiation is not dependent on CITED2 (Figure 2E). Additional experiments in which CITED2 was genetically disrupted in FcεRI– progenitors and MCPs confirmed the dispensable role of CITED2 for the formation of mast cells (Figure 2F-H). Follow-up studies using the mast cell lines LAD2 and HMC-1 demonstrated that wild-type and CITED2-deficient mast cells survived equally well and proliferated with similar kinetics (Figure 2I-J). Taken together, our results collectively suggest that CITED2 is dispensable for mast cell differentiation, survival, and proliferation. Whether the knockout of CITED2 alters the phenotype or function of the mast cells or the terminal mast cell maturation has yet to be investigated.
CRISPR-based strategies have successfully been developed to knock out genes in mature in vitro–derived human and mouse mast cells.11,12 Here, we report a vector-free CRISPR/Cas9-based framework using commercially available reagents, electroporation-based delivery, and flow cytometry and Sanger sequencing readouts that allows for determining specific genes’ role in regulating human mast cell differentiation. With the developed approach, we show that MITF is required for human mast cell differentiation, whereas CITED2 is dispensable.
The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2019-01729).
Acknowledgments: Recombinant stem cell factor was a generous gift from Swedish Orphan Biovitrum. The authors thank Anne Neddermeyer and Yunbing Shen for the support on the CRISPR/Cas9 protocol. The authors also acknowledge Daryl Boey for plotting the UMAPs.
This research was funded by grants from The Swedish Research Council (2018-02070, 2020-01693, 2021-03178, and 2022-00558), the Swedish Cancer Society, Karolinska Institutet, and Magnus Bergvall’s Foundation.
Contribution: J.M. and J.S.D. conceived the project; J.M. performed the experiments and analyzed the data; J.S.D. secured fundings; F.W. conceptualized the CRISPR editing and readout; G.N. provided important advice on the project; J.M. and J.S.D. drafted the manuscript; and all authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Correspondence: Jiezhen Mo, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, NKS BioClinicum J7:30, Visionsgatan 4, Solna 171 76, Sweden; email: [email protected]; and Joakim Dahlin, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, NKS BioClinicum J7:30, Visionsgatan 4, Solna 171 76, Sweden; email: [email protected].
References
Author notes
J.S.D. is the senior author.
Single-cell RNA-sequencing data from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (accession number GSE184351) was processed.
Original data may be accessed upon reasonable request to the corresponding authors, Jiezhen Mo ([email protected]) and Joakim Dahlin ([email protected]). Access to data containing personal information is regulated by the General Data Protection Regulation, Swedish legislation, and the Swedish Ethical Review Authority and will be shared if the conditions in the ethical permit are met.
The full-text version of this article contains a data supplement.