Only pDCs among all human DC subsets react robustly to EBV infection with a distinct production of type I IFN subtypes.
EBV infections limit pDC activation, and even exogenous IFN supplementation or pDC expansion delays EBV infection only transiently.
Infectious mononucleosis, caused by infection with the human gamma-herpesvirus Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), manifests with one of the strongest CD8+ T-cell responses described in humans. The resulting T-cell memory response controls EBV infection asymptomatically in the vast majority of persistently infected individuals. Whether and how dendritic cells (DCs) contribute to the priming of this near-perfect immune control remains unclear. Here we show that of all the human DC subsets, plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) play a central role in the detection of EBV infection in vitro and in mice with reconstituted human immune system components. pDCs respond to EBV by producing the interferon (IFN) subtypes α1, α2, α5, α7, α14, and α17. However, the virus curtails this type I IFN production with its latent EBV gene products EBNA3A and EBNA3C. The induced type I IFNs inhibit EBV entry and the proliferation of latently EBV-transformed B cells but do not influence lytic reactivation of the virus in vitro. In vivo, exogenous IFN-α14 and IFN-α17, as well as pDC expansion, delay EBV infection and the resulting CD8+ T-cell expansion, but pDC depletion does not significantly influence EBV infection. Thus, consistent with the observation that primary immunodeficiencies compromising type I IFN responses affect only alpha- and beta-herpesvirus infections, we found that EBV elicits pDC responses that transiently suppress viral replication and attenuate CD8+ T-cell expansion but are not required to control primary infection.
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a common gamma herpesvirus affecting only humans.1 EBV is one of the most successful viruses, persistently infecting >95% of the adult population. Its success in establishing persistence in humans is due to a cascade of latent gene expression programs that allow infected cells to gain access to the long-lived memory B-cell pool.2 The transition of latently EBV-infected B cells to the virus-associated tumors that express the same latent gene products is believed to be prevented by cell-mediated immune control3 because immunodeficiencies affecting cytotoxic lymphocytes predispose for different EBV-positive lymphomas.4-6 Dendritic cells (DCs) might play a crucial role in priming this protective immune control during primary EBV infection.7,8
In response to this requirement, the distribution of receptors that recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) on human DCs could have been shaped by successful pathogens such as EBV during their virus–host coevolution. This action might be one reason why human DCs differ significantly in their PAMP recognition from the mouse.9 Indeed, the Toll-like receptors 7 (TLR7) and TLR9 that recognize as PAMPs, respectively, viral RNA and double-stranded DNA, as packaged in herpesviruses, have peculiar distributions. They are primarily expressed by B cells and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) in humans, whereas they are present on nearly all DC subsets in mice.9,10 This differential response by DCs to TLR stimulation can also be observed in mice with human immune system components (huNSG mice) after reconstitution with CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells.11,12 These in vivo models allow the interrogation of mouse and human DCs in parallel upon injection of TLR stimuli. TLR7 stimulation elicits efficient type I interferon (IFN) production by human pDCs but nearly no interleukin-12 (IL-12) production by human conventional DCs (cDCs).11 In contrast, mouse DC compartments react with both cytokines to TLR7 stimulation. Similarly, bacterial cell wall components such as TLR4 agonists elicit both type I IFN and IL-12 by mouse DCs but are not efficiently detected by human pDCs or cDCs due to low or absent TLR4 expression. The human DC compartments of huNSG mice can therefore be used to interrogate innate immune detection of EBV by human DCs to further characterize the antigen-presenting cells that are involved in the priming of the near-perfect immune control of this tumor virus.
As one of these human DC compartments, pDCs respond primarily with type I IFN to viral infections. Type I IFNs are a pleiotropic family of cytokines with important functions in eliciting antiviral immune responses within the host. Type I IFNs consist of 12 distinct IFN-α subtypes, IFN-β, IFN-ε, IFN-κ, and IFN-ω.13 All IFN-α subtypes lack introns, and their protein length varies between 161 and 167 amino acids. Their protein sequences are highly conserved, with 75% to 99% amino acid sequence identity.14,15 They all bind to the IFN-α/β receptor (IFNAR) receptor, although binding affinity to the receptor subunits IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 differs between subtypes.16 The activation of distinct signaling cascades may occur in a subtype-specific manner,17 possibly due to different binding affinities, cell type specificities, the microenvironment, and timing or preconditioning of signaling pathways.18,19 These factors ultimately result in specific patterns of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) induced by the individual IFN-α subtypes. This action in turn explains their distinct antiviral and immunomodulatory properties in different viral infections.20-26 However, the biological role of individual IFN-α subtypes during EBV infection has not been studied thus far, partly due to lack of a suitable in vivo infection model.
After EBV infection in vivo, we found that IFN-α responses predominated over those of IL-12, suggesting that pDCs were the main DC subset responding to EBV infection. We further found a specific IFN-α signature elicited by EBV infection characterized by robust production of IFN-α1, IFN-α2, IFN-α5, IFN-α7, IFN-α14, and IFN-α17. Although type I IFN responses were not required for EBV-driven T-cell expansion, IFN-α was capable of limiting EBV entry into B cells in vitro and delaying EBV infection in vivo. These studies suggest that pDCs are part of the innate immune response to EBV but that EBV has developed countermeasures against type I IFN production, including expression of the latent gene products EBNA3A and EBNA3C.
Materials and methods
EBV virus purification
EBV B95-8 was produced from EBNA3A knock-out (3aKO), EBNA3C knock-out (3cKO), or wild-type bacterial artificial chromosomes maintained in human embryonic kidney HEK293 cells, as described elsewhere.27 To calculate Raji green units (RGU), the green fluorescent protein (GFP)–expressing viruses were titrated on Raji cells (ATCC) in serial dilution, and the GFP-expressing cells were analyzed by flow cytometry 2 days later.
Isolation of cell subsets from peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors were isolated by density gradient centrifugation on Ficoll-Paque Premium (GE Healthcare). pDCs and B cells were isolated with BDCA-4 and CD19 microbeads, respectively, by using an AutoMACS pro (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH). For the pDC-depleted fractions, BDCA-4 microbeads were used, and the most stringent AutoMACS depletion program (deplete 025) was applied.
Recombinant IFN-α subtypes and inhibition assays
The recombinant IFN-α subtypes used in this study were produced and purified as previously described.24 Raji, Ramos, or primary B cells were distributed in 96 well plates and exposed to IFN-α subtypes and EBV at the indicated concentrations and multiplicities of infection (MOIs) for 48 hours, and viral entrance into the cell nucleus was detected by GFP expression according to flow cytometry. B-cell or EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL) proliferation was measured by using the CellTrace Violet Cell Proliferation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Alternatively, proliferation was measured by thymidine incorporation: after 8 days of culture, [3H]thymidine (1 μCi/well) was added for the last 16 hours before the cells were harvested, and the level of [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured by using a 1450 MicroBeta Plus liquid scintillation counter (PerkinElmer).
Class C CpG ODN 2395 (CpG C) was purchased from InvivoGen, R848 from Enzo Life Sciences, and Poly (I:C) from InvivoGen.
NOD-scid γcnull (NSG) mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory, and huNSG mice were generated as previously described.27-29 Newborn NSG mice (1-5 days old) were irradiated with 1 Gy and reconstituted after 5 to 7 hours by intrahepatic injection of 1 to 3 × 105 CD34+ human fetal liver–derived hematopoietic progenitor cells (Advanced Bioscience Resources). Twelve weeks later, the reconstitution of human immune system components in the peripheral blood of the huNSG mice was analyzed by using flow cytometry. For cell preparations, spleens were mechanically disrupted and filtered by using a 70-μm cell strainer before erythrocyte lysis. Lymph nodes were mechanically disrupted and filtered through a 70-μm cell strainer. Bone marrow cells were flushed from excised tibia and femurs or isolated via centrifugation. Whole blood was treated by 2 to 3 rounds of erythrocyte lysis. All animal protocols were approved by the Cantonal Veterinary Office Zurich (148/2011, ZH209/2014, and ZH159/17).
EBV infection and treatment of mice
huNSG mice were injected intraperitoneally (IP) with 1 × 105 RGU or 5 ×105 RGU EBV wild-type, 5 × 105 RGU 3aKO, or 5 × 105 RGU 3cKO. For IFN-α treatment, recombinant IFN-α subtypes IFN-α14 or IFN-α17 (8000 U per mouse) were injected IP for 14 consecutive days, starting 1 day before EBV infection. For DC expansions, mice were injected IP with 10 μg of recombinant human Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (FLT3L, generously provided by Amgen Inc.) daily for 5 to 8 consecutive days before EBV infection. For pDC depletions, mice were injected IP with 3 doses of 30 mg/kg anti–CD303-LFB (α-CD303) as per manufacturer’s recommendations (generously provided by LFB Biotechnologies). Anti–CD303-LFB is the humanized version of chimeric 122A2 antibody previously described.30 Depletion efficiency was monitored according to flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood samples beginning before EBV infection and weekly thereafter. At experimental termination, depletion was further assessed in blood, spleen, bone marrow, and lymph nodes.
Assessment of EBV viral titer in blood and spleen
EBV viral loads were measured as previously described.27,29,31
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
IFN-α Pan and IL-12p40 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits were purchased from Mabtech AB, and assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Statistical analyses were performed by using Prism software (GraphPad Software). Paired Student t tests, unpaired Student t tests, or 2-tailed Mann-Whitney U tests were used as indicated. Differences with P < .05 were considered statistically significant and are displayed in the figures.
EBV infection is mainly sensed by pDCs via type I IFN production in human leukocytes
To evaluate innate immune detection of EBV by human leukocytes, we characterized production of the pDC- or cDC-specific signature cytokines IFN-α (total IFNα, including all subtypes) and IL-12, respectively,32,33 in human PBMCs after EBV infection. Eighteen to 24 hours after infection with the B95-8 strain of EBV at different MOIs, substantial IFN-α production could be measured, with levels similar to, or exceeding, stimulation with the TLR9 agonist CpG, the TLR3 agonist Poly I:C, and the TLR7/8 agonist R848 (Figure 1A). IFN-β was also produced but at 10-fold lower levels (supplemental Figure 1C). In contrast, only minimal IL-12p40, with concentrations 10-fold lower than R848 stimulation, could be detected (Figure 1B). In good agreement with previous findings that the nuclear antigen 3C of EBV (EBNA3C) interferes with IFN regulatory factors,34 we observed that PBMCs produced fivefold higher IFN-α levels in response to infection with EBNA3A- and EBNA3C-deficient viruses (3aKO and 3cKO) (Figure 1C). IFN-α production by wild-type, 3aKO, and 3cKO viruses was dependent on pDCs because their depletion reduced IFN-α concentrations to background levels upon EBV infection (Figure 1D; supplemental Figure 1A). Interestingly, and in contrast to IFN-α production, the low levels of IL-12p40 production were further decreased in the absence of EBNA3A or EBNA3C (supplemental Figure 1B). Regardless of the presence or absence of EBNA3A or EBNA3C, EBV infection did not influence pDC viability (supplemental Figure 1D). These findings support the notion that pDCs are the primary DC subtype responding to initial EBV infection.
pDCs preferentially produce IFN-α1, IFN-α2, IFN-α5, IFN-α7, IFN-α14, and IFN-α17 after EBV infection of human leukocytes
Recent studies have identified significant differences in the efficacy of IFN-α subtypes during hepatitis B virus, HIV, and simian immunodeficiency virus infections.35 We therefore addressed which human IFN-α subtypes were elicited upon exposure of pDCs (Figure 2A) or PBMCs (Figure 2B) to EBV. For this purpose, IFN-α subtype transcription was characterized in purified pDCs at 1 and 5 hours post-EBV exposure or incubation with R848 or CpG. At 5 hours, EBV elicited mainly IFN-α1, IFN-α2, IFN-α5, IFN-α7, IFN-α14, and IFN-α17. Expression of IFN-α5 and IFN-α17 was further observed already at 1 hour postexposure when transcript levels were still very low. In contrast, IFN-α production in response to R848 was dominated by IFN-α2 and IFN-α14, whereas CpG elicited mainly IFN-α17. The same IFN-α subtype pattern in response to EBV was also observed in infected PBMCs 16 hours after EBV exposure and, likewise, was strictly pDC dependent. As a confirmation of EBV-dependent IFN-α transcription, we analyzed messenger RNA levels of the ISG myxovirus resistance protein B (MxB),36 signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1),37 IFN-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 3 (IFIT3),38 and 2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthetase 2 (OAS2).39 All of these ISGs were efficiently induced by EBV exposure, and both IFIT3 and OAS2 exhibited a trend toward higher induction by EBNA3A- and EBNA3C-deficient viruses (Figure 2C). ISG transcription upon EBV exposure reached similar or higher levels compared with CpG and R848 stimulation (Figure 2D). Thus, EBV sensing by pDCs results in the preferential production of IFN-α1, IFN-α2, IFN-α5, IFN-α7, IFN-α14, and IFN-α17.
IFN-α subtypes inhibit EBV entry and proliferation of latently EBV-infected B cells but not lytic EBV reactivation
We next assessed the ability of various IFN-α subtypes to modulate different stages of the EBV life cycle.40 We chose the 2 IFN-α subtypes that were abundantly produced during EBV infection of human leukocytes, IFN-α14 and IFN-α17, and 2 that were subdominant, IFN-α6 and IFN-α16. We first tested to what extent titrated doses of the IFN-α subtypes, including 10 ng/mL (which we detected during EBV stimulation of PBMCs), were able to inhibit EBV entry (Figure 3A). For this purpose, recombinant EBV viruses encoding GFP were used to infect the Raji or Ramos Burkitt lymphoma cell lines or primary human B cells. GFP expression as a measure of viral DNA delivery to the nucleus was evaluated in the presence of 1, 10, and 100 ng/mL of IFN-α6, IFN-α14, IFN-α16, or IFN-α17. All IFN-α subtypes, including IFN-α14, were able to inhibit GFP expression in a dose-dependent manner after EBV entry into Raji cells, as well as into Ramos and primary human B cells (supplemental Figure 2A). B-cell viability was not influenced by this treatment (supplemental Figure 2B).
Furthermore, B-cell proliferation as a result of latent EBV infection after EBV entry was measured by dilution of the CellTrace Violet fluorescent dye or radioactive thymidine incorporation. This proliferation was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by some IFN-α subtypes, including IFN-α14 (Figure 3B-C). Finally, the proliferation of established B-cell lines transformed by latent EBV infection, LCLs, was also inhibited by 10 ng/mL of recombinant IFN-α14 (Figure 3D). In contrast, lytic EBV reactivation upon B-cell receptor cross-linking on the Akata Burkitt lymphoma cell–derivative AKBM was not altered by the tested IFN-α subtypes (Figure 3E). All of the tested IFN-α subtypes stimulated similar STAT1 phosphorylation, downstream of the type I IFN receptor, as measured by using intracellular flow cytometry or Western blotting (supplemental Figure 3). These studies indicate that EBV entry and latent EBV-driven B-cell expansion can be partially inhibited by different IFN-α subtypes, including IFN-α14, produced in response to EBV infection, whereas lytic EBV reactivation is not affected by type I IFNs.
EBV infection elicits type I IFN production in mice with reconstituted human immune system components
To extend these in vitro studies to EBV infection in vivo, we infected NOD-scid γc−/− mice that had been reconstituted with human immune system compartments by neonatal intrahepatic injection of human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells28 with 5 × 105 RGU of recombinant EBV viruses. Eighteen hours after infection, we detected ∼1 ng/mL of total IFN-α and not detectable or <10 pg/mL of IFN-β in the peripheral blood of infected, but not uninfected, mice (Figure 4A; supplemental Figure 4A). No significant increase in IL-12 production could be detected at 18 and 72 hours after infection (Figure 4B), mirroring the in vitro findings in PBMCs (Figure 1A-B). Although unchanged IL-12p40 concentrations could be detected, IL-12p70 levels were below the detection limit (data not shown). An increase in IFN-α production could also be detected upon in vivo infection with EBNA3A- and EBNA3C-deficient viruses (Figure 4C). However, IL-12 production was not altered in the absence of EBNA3A or EBNA3C. Confirming the IFN-α induction, an increase in ISG transcription was observed after EBV infection, which reached statistical significance for MxB and STAT1 (Figure 4D). These observations suggest that EBV infection elicits IFN-α, but not IL-12, production in huNSG mice.
Type I IFN injection transiently attenuates viral loads and CD8+ T-cell expansion after EBV infection in vivo
After IFN-α detection upon EBV infection, we investigated whether injections of exogenous IFN-α influenced EBV infection of huNSG. Mice were injected daily with 8000 U of IFN-α14 or IFN-α17, or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as a control, beginning 1 day before infection with EBV. Blood viral loads and peripheral T-cell responses were monitored weekly over the course of infection (Figure 5A). Viral loads were reliably detectable in peripheral blood of huNSG mice beginning 3 weeks’ postinfection.41 At this time point, reduced viral loads were observed in peripheral blood of IFN-α–treated animals compared with PBS control animals. However, at weeks 4 and 5 postinfection, peripheral viral loads were similar between the treated and untreated groups (Figure 5B). Nevertheless, spleen weight was significantly lower in EBV-infected, IFN-α–treated animals at the time of euthanization (Figure 5C). Although only data from IFN-α14–treated animals reached statistical significance, similar effects on viral loads and spleen weighs were observed in both IFN-α14– and IFN-α17–treated groups.
Spleen size increases upon EBV infection are due to EBV-transformed B-cell proliferation but mostly due to expanding CD8+ T cells.41 We therefore analyzed CD8+ T-cell expansion in response to EBV infection of huNSG mice after IFN-α14 or IFN-α17 treatment. CD8+ T-cell expansion after EBV infection was similar in spleen and blood in the absence or presence of an HLA-A2 transgene in huNSG mice (supplemental Figure 4B). In IFN-α14–treated animals, reduced blood viral titers were observed at week 3 postinfection, with a corresponding reduction in CD8+ T-cell expansion in the blood at week 4 (Figure 5D). A similar trend was present in IFN-α14– and IFN-α17–treated animals at week 5 postinfection, which was further detected in the bone marrow and spleen at euthanization (Figure 5E-F). Decreased CD8+ T-cell expansion further correlated with diminished spleen size in EBV-infected, IFN-α–treated huNSG mice compared with nontreated, infected animals but did not significantly alter CD8+, EBNA2+, or CD20+ cell distribution in splenic tissue sections (supplemental Figure 4C). Taken together, these experiments show that the presence of IFN-α early in infection can limit EBV infection and/or viral replication and may reduce CD8+ T-cell expansion as a consequence.
EBV infection may redistribute pDCs in vivo, which, upon expansion, transiently control viral loads
To characterize which DC subpopulations respond during EBV infection of huNSG mice, we monitored pDCs and cDCs after intraperitoneal inoculation with 105 RGU of EBV. We observed that percentages and total numbers of pDCs and cDCs dropped in the peripheral blood upon EBV infection (Figure 6A). Although pDC and cDC percentages also decreased in the spleen after infection, presumably due to lymphocyte expansion, total splenic DC numbers were unchanged or perhaps slightly increased. The decreased percentages and total numbers of pDCs in the peripheral blood were detectable as early as 3 weeks’ postinfection and were maintained for the duration of infection (Figure 6B), whereas no loss of pDC viability could be detected during EBV infection (supplemental Figure 5B), suggesting that blood pDCs redistribute to secondary lymphoid tissues after EBV infection.
We further analyzed the effect of therapeutic DC expansion on EBV infection in huNSG mice. For this purpose, we injected recombinant FLT3L, a cytokine essential for efficient DC development,42 before EBV infection (Figure 6D). FLT3L treatment significantly expanded both pDCs (up to fivefold) and cDCs (up to 10-fold) in huNSG mice (Figure 6C). The flow cytometric gating strategy for the quantification of these DC populations, as well as the CD1c+ (BDCA-1+) and CD141+ (BDCA-3+) cDC subsets, is shown in supplemental Figure 5A and is similar to our previous assessment.11 Consistent with recombinant IFN-α subtype injections, FLT3L-mediated DC expansion resulted in delayed EBV infection with reduced viral titers at week 3 after virus injection (Figure 6E). Furthermore, spleen weights of DC-expanded and EBV-infected huNSG mice were reduced at the time of euthanization (Figure 6F). This reduction in spleen size was likely also the result of decreased CD8+ T-cell expansion, detectable in the peripheral blood 4 weeks’ postinfection and in the spleen at euthanization (Figure 6G). Accordingly, CD8+ T-cell expansion was found to correlate with viral loads in the spleen, and the drop in DC frequency with increased viral loads in the spleen most likely resulted from the significant CD8+ T-cell expansion after EBV infection (supplemental Figure 6A). No differences in viral loads, CD8+ T-cell, pDC, and cDC frequencies and total numbers were found in EBV-induced lymphoma-bearing mice vs tumor-free mice (supplemental Figure 6B). Thus, DCs may redistribute to secondary lymphoid organs during EBV infection, and expanding them therapeutically with FLT3L before EBV infection leads to a transient improvement in viral immune control.
pDC depletion does not alter EBV infection or CD8+ T-cell expansion
These gain-of-function experiments suggested that improved pDC-mediated IFN-α production delays EBV infection in vivo. However, the reconstituted human immune system compartments of huNSG mice contain ∼1% pDCs, a frequency similar to that of human blood.43 We therefore characterized whether this physiological level of pDCs is sufficient to execute innate immune control of EBV infection and influence adaptive T-cell responses to the virus. Accordingly, we depleted pDCs with a CD303 (BDCA-2)-specific antibody (anti–CD303-LFB) before and 1 day after EBV infection (Figure 7A). This treatment efficiently removed pDCs from the blood of huNSG mice (Figure 7B) and further abolished IFN-α production, and even the minimal IL-12 production, occurring in response to EBV infection (Figure 7C). It also significantly diminished ISG transcription for MxB and STAT1 (supplemental Figure 7B). This depletion persisted in the blood until euthanization and was also detectable in spleen and lymph nodes but not in the bone marrow (Figure 7D-E). cDCs were not affected by the CD303-specific pDC depletion (Figure 7F). The pDC depletion did not affect EBV viral loads longitudinally in blood or spleen at euthanization (Figure 7G). Furthermore, spleen weights were not significantly altered in EBV-infected, pDC-depleted huNSG mice (Figure 7H). Accordingly, CD8+ T-cell expansion and activation, as well as natural killer cell frequencies, were comparable with and without pDC depletion in blood, lymph nodes, bone marrow, and spleen (Figure 7I; supplemental Figure 7C-F). These findings suggest that pDC expansion and IFN-α injection transiently improve immune control of EBV but that the physiological pDC response to EBV infection is not sufficient to alter infection and immune control of the virus in vivo.
Our study found that of all DC compartments, pDCs reacted most robustly to EBV infection of PBMCs in vitro and of huNSG mice in vivo. They preferentially produced IFN-α1, IFN-α2, IFN-α5, IFN-α7, IFN-α14, and IFN-α17 after EBV infection, and this type I IFN production was suppressed by the latent EBV antigens EBNA3A and EBNA3C. IFN-α subtypes inhibited EBV entry and proliferation but not lytic reactivation of EBV. Furthermore, administration of exogenous IFN-α14 or IFN-α17 to huNSG mice delayed EBV infection but did not significantly influence the viral load set point. Although EBV infection activates pDCs after infection of huNSG mice and leads to their loss from blood in both huNSG mice and humans during primary EBV infection,44,45 their depletion does not influence viral titers. Therefore, pDCs detect EBV and participate in the innate immune response to this tumor virus but do not significantly influence the outcome of its infection.
These data are in good agreement with previous in vitro studies that described innate immune recognition of EBV via TLR9 of pDCs.46-49 TLR9 preferentially detects nonmethylated CpG motifs in viral DNA.10 This recognition targets the linear viral DNA in virus particles.47 However, after B-cell infection with EBV, viral DNA rapidly circularizes into an episome, which is then heavily methylated and thereby presumably invisible to innate immune detection.50 In addition, TLR2 and TLR3, which are preferentially expressed by cDCs and myeloid cells, have been implicated in EBV detection.51-53 However, we detected very little direct cDC activation as measured by IL-12 production. Moreover, primarily hairpin structures in EBV-encoded small RNAs have been suggested to stimulate both TLR3 and RIG-I as endosomal and cytosolic PAMP receptors for double-stranded RNA,53,54 but we have previously detected no significant changes in EBV infection and associated T-cell expansions in huNSG mice after infection with EBV-encoded small RNA–deficient EBV.55 Thus, EBV readily activates pDCs and pDC-mediated type I IFN production but only marginally stimulates cDCs.
Despite their activation, depletion of pDCs resulted in no significant changes in EBV infection and immune control in huNSG mice in the present study. These findings are also mirrored by primary immunodeficiencies that affect the type I IFN pathway, including mutations in STAT1 and TYK2 that compromise type I IFN receptor signaling, or in UNC-93B and NEMO that compromise endosomal TLR signaling.56-59 Affected individuals are primarily susceptible to alpha- and beta-herpesvirus infections, including herpes simplex encephalitis, but rarely experience EBV-associated diseases. Similarly, IL-12 and IL-12 receptor mutations, resulting in diminished IFN-γ production during viral infections, do not predispose for EBV-associated diseases but are clinically characterized primarily as Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial disease.56 Supporting the notion that IFNs have only transient effects on EBV infection, viral transformation of B cells is only sensitive during the first 24 hours to type I IFN and to type II IFNs for up to 3 weeks, whereas LCLs seem to be less sensitive to both IFN classes.60 In good agreement with this, we find little IL-12 production to drive IFN-γ production and no significant alterations of EBV infection of huNSG mice after pDC depletion, as the main type I IFN source. This scenario obviously begs the question how efficient cell-mediated immune control of EBV is established, which protects most persistently infected individuals from lymphomagenesis. We and others have assumed that these responses need to be primed by DCs before efficient expansion by EBV-transformed B cells.7,61 However, the absence of efficient cDC maturation during EBV infection and the limited effects of pDC depletion on viral loads and antiviral T-cell responses force us to reconsider this notion. Similarly, future studies might need to reevaluate the T-cell priming potential of EBV-infected B cells in vivo.
The full-text version of this article contains a data supplement.
FLT3L for this study was generously provided by Amgen Inc.
This study was supported by Cancer Research Switzerland (KFS-4091-02-2017), KFSPMS, and KFSPHHLD of the University of Zürich; the Vontobel Foundation; the Baugarten Foundation; the Sobek Foundation; the Swiss Vaccine Research Institute; the Swiss MS Society; the Swiss National Science Foundation (310030_162560 and CRSII3_160708); COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology); and the COST Action BM1404 MyeEUNITER (http://www.mye-euniter.eu) (C.M.) COST is part of the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020. C.G. was the recipient of a Marie-Heim Vögtlin fellowship from the Swiss National Science Foundation (PMPDP3_145504) and received support from the EMDO Foundation.
Contribution: C.G., A. Murer, A. Müller, and D.V. performed the experiments; C.G. and C.M. designed the research; K.S., E.J., N.F., J.K., A.Z., R.C., A.D., P.M., and U.D. contributed essential information or vital reagents; and C.G. and C.M. wrote the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: E.J., N.F., and P.M. work for LFB Biotechnologies, which provided the α-CD303 depleting antibody. A.D. works for Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, which provided a second α-CD303 antibody. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.
Correspondence: Christian Münz, Viral Immunobiology, Institute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstr 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland; e-mail: email@example.com.
A. Müller and D.V. contributed equally to this study.