Transferrin receptor 2 drives lysosomal delivery of transferrin in erythroid progenitors.
Erythroid mitochondria specifically associate with lysosomes and are regulated by transferrin receptor 2.
Erythroid progenitors are the largest consumers of iron in the human body. In these cells, a high flux of iron must reach the mitochondrial matrix to form sufficient heme to support hemoglobinization. Canonical erythroid iron trafficking occurs via the first transferrin receptor (TfR1)-mediated endocytosis of diferric-transferrin into recycling endosomes, where ferric iron is released, reduced, and exported to the cytosol via DMT1. However, mice lacking TfR1 or DMT1 demonstrate residual erythropoiesis, suggesting additional pathways for iron use. How iron moves from endosomes to mitochondria is incompletely understood, with both cytosolic chaperoning and “kiss and run” interorganelle transfer implicated. TfR2, in contrast to its paralog TfR1, has established roles in iron sensing, but not iron uptake. Recently, mice with marrow-selective TfR2 deficiency were found to exhibit microcytosis, suggesting TfR2 may also contribute to erythroid hemoglobinization. In this study, we identify alternative trafficking, in which TfR2 mediates lysosomal transferrin delivery. Imaging studies reveal an erythroid lineage-specific organelle arrangement consisting of a focal lysosomal cluster surrounded by a nest of mitochondria, with direct contacts between these 2 organelles. Erythroid TfR2 deficiency yields aberrant mitochondrial morphology, implicating TfR2-dependent transferrin trafficking in mitochondrial maintenance. Human TFR2 shares a lineage- and stage-specific expression pattern with MCOLN1, encoding a lysosomal iron channel, and MFN2, encoding a protein mediating organelle contacts. Functional studies reveal these latter factors to be involved in mitochondrial regulation and erythroid differentiation, with Mfn2 required for mitochondrial-lysosomal contacts. These findings identify a new pathway for erythroid iron trafficking involving TfR2-mediated lysosomal delivery followed by interorganelle transfer to mitochondria.
Erythroid cells use the major share of absorbed and recycling iron, approximately 25 mg daily, primarily in the synthesis of heme.1 For heme synthesis, iron must reach the mitochondrial matrix, where it is inserted into protoporphyrin IX.2 The major route of cellular iron uptake occurs through the internalization of diferric holo-transferrin via its interaction with the first transferrin receptor, TfR1. Iron is then released from transferrin–TfR1 complexes, and apo-transferrin is recycled to the cell surface. Although intracellular iron trafficking has been studied at length,3 specific mechanisms of iron delivery from endosome to mitochondrial matrix have remained incompletely understood.4 Current models include chaperone-guided cytosolic transit and direct interorganellar transfer through transient interaction (“kiss and run”).5,6
Prior findings indicate additional, noncanonical iron trafficking mechanisms in erythropoiesis. For example, TfR1 null murine embryos exhibit circulating erythroid cells and are largely indistinguishable from wild-type littermates during early embryogenesis. Yolk sac hematopoietic precursors from these animals can be expanded and stained for hemoglobin, indicating heme synthesis in the absence of TfR1.7 Further, TfR1+/− adult mice demonstrate increased reticulocytes and red blood cell counts without any change in erythropoietin levels.8 Slc11a2−/− mice, which lack the divalent metal transporter (DMT1) mediating export of iron from endosomes, are viable and demonstrate erythropoiesis.9 Finally, in a human patient and in mice with DMT1 deficiency, erythropoietin treatment ameliorated anemia.10 This erythropoietin responsiveness, usually lost under conditions of iron restriction, implies the existence of a DMT1-independent pathway of iron trafficking in erythroid cells.
An additional mediator of iron-transferrin uptake is the second transferrin receptor, TfR2, a paralog of TfR1 with expression restricted mainly to hepatocytes and erythroid progenitors.11 TfR2 can mediate iron uptake,12,13 but its binding affinity for diferric transferrin is 25-30 times lower than that of TfR1,14 leading to the notion that it functions in iron sensing, rather than delivery. Consistent with its role as an iron sensor, hepatic TfR2 regulates production of hepcidin, the primary hormone regulating circulating iron levels,15,16 and erythroid TfR2 mediates differentiation blockade in response to low iron, possibly through its interaction with the erythropoietin receptor.17-19 However, recent findings raise the possibility that TfR2 may also contribute to mitochondrial iron delivery. In a murine marrow transplant model, TfR2 null donor cells yield microcytic red cells, suggestive of defective hemoglobinization.17 This finding is further supported in humans by genome-wide association study linkage of red cell mean corpuscular volume to the TFR2 locus.20 Second, ectopic expression of TfR2 in HEK293 cells selectively increases uptake of radiolabeled iron in mitochondria, as opposed to cytosol.21
TfR2 endocytosis and intracellular trafficking employ pathways distinct from those of TfR1. Specifically, a significant fraction of TfR2 is routed to the lysosome through a TSG101-dependent ESCRT pathway, leading to its enhanced turnover compared with TfR1. This lysosomal trafficking is further enhanced by deprivation of its ligand, holo-transferrin.22 The functional significance, mechanistic basis, and extent of ligand cotrafficking associated with TfR2 lysosomal transport remain unknown. However, emerging data support involvement of the lysosomal compartment in intracellular iron use. For example, mobilization of storage iron requires lysosomal catabolism of ferritin through an autophagic pathway.23 In addition, a pathway for iron export from lysosomes has been identified, involving the cationic transporter Mucolipin-1.24
Our results using primary human progenitors reveal an erythroid-specific pathway of transferrin delivery to the lysosome dependent on TfR2. In addition, we identify specialized multiorganelle structures containing a core of aggregated lysosomes closely surrounded by a shell of mitochondria. At an ultrastructural level, these structures displayed frequent lysosomal–mitochondrial membrane contact sites, junctions previously implicated in transfer of ions25-28 and metabolites.29-31 Finally, a cohort of factors is found that is developmentally coregulated with TfR2 and that participates in lysosomal biogenesis (cathepsin B), lysosomal iron transport (Mucolipin-1), and mitochondrial membrane contact site assembly (Mitofusin-2). Loss of function studies for Mucolipin-1 and Mitofusin-2 uncovered critical roles in erythroid differentiation. The process by which erythroid cells deliver extracellular iron to heme is known to be extremely rapid and efficient,6 but evidence for a specific mitochondrial guidance system has hitherto proven elusive. These findings offer the first evidence for such a system and illustrate its participation in the erythroid differentiation program.
Purified normal human donor CD34+ progenitors derived from granulocyte colony-stimulating factor–mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cells were purchased from Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (Seattle, WA). On thawing, cells were cultured 72 hours in prestimulation medium consisting of Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM; Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD) with BIT 9500 supplement (Stem Cell Technologies; Vancouver, Canada), and a cytokine mix of 100 ng/mL human stem cell factor (SCF; PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ), 100 ng/mL human Feline McDonough Sarcoma–like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (PeproTech), 100 ng/mL human thrombopoietin (PeproTech), and 20 ng/mL human interleukin 3 (IL-3; PeproTech). Cells were moved to erythroid or granulocytic medium after 72 hours of prestimulation. Erythroid medium consisted of IMDM with 2 mM l-glutamine (Gibco), Chelex-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) stripped 0.05% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich), insulin-transferrin-selenium supplement (Stem Cell Technologies), 0.0012% 1-thioglycerol (Sigma-Aldrich), recombinant human erythropoietin at 4.5 U/mL (Procrit, Beerse, Belgium), and 25 ng/mL human SCF. Granulocytic medium consisted of IMDM with 2 mM l-glutamine, Chelex-100 stripped 0.05% bovine serum albumin, insulin-transferrin-selenium supplement, 0.0012% 1-thioglycerol, 10 ng/mL granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PeproTech), 10 ng/mL IL-3, and 25 ng/mL SCF. For all experiments, cells underwent analysis after 3 days in erythroid or granulocytic culture medium. For heme studies, Bafilomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) or dimethyl sulfoxide control were added to 3-day erythroid cultures for 16 hours before analysis. HUDEP-2 cells were cultured in StemSpan Serum-Free Expansion Medium (Stem Cell Technologies) with 50 ng/mL human SCF, 3 U/mL Epo (Procrit), 1 µM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich), and 1 µg/mL doxycycline (Sigma-Aldrich). K562 cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA) were grown in RPMI medium (Gibco) with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 2 mM l-glutamine (Gibco), and Anti-Anti antibiotic supplement (Gibco). HEK293T cells (ATCC) were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (Gibco) with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 2 mM l-glutamine (Gibco), and Anti-anti (Gibco).
Transferrin uptake assays
Analysis of transferrin internalization was performed using fluorochrome- and gold-conjugated holotransferrin, as described in the supplemental Data.
Cell extraction and immunoblot
For sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of whole-cell lysates, cell pellets were combined with equal volumes of 2× Laemmli sample buffer (60 mM Tris⋅HCl at pH 6.8, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 100 µM DTT, 10% glycerol, 0.01% bromophenol blue) supplemented with cOmplete Protease Inhibitors (11836170001, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) and PhosSTOP Phosphatase Inhibitors (04906845001, Roche Diagnostics), followed by DNA shearing using tuberculin syringes and boiling for 5 minutes. After electrophoresis and transfer, nitrocellulose membranes were probed overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies at a 1:1000 dilution in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T) with 1% nonfat dried milk. Horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibodies (Bethyl Labs, Montgomery, TX) were applied for 1 hour at a 1:5000 dilution. Horseradish peroxidase detection was performed using chemiluminescent SuperSignal West Pico substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific). Cell surface biotinylation experiments are described in detail in the supplemental information.
Primary antibodies consisted of mouse monoclonal anti-human TfR2 (sc-32271 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), rabbit polyclonal anti-TfR1 (sc-9099 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse monoclonal anti-TfR1 (sc-32272 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse monoclonal anti-Tubulin (clone DM1A, #T9026 from Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit polyclonal anti-MFN2 (ab56889 from Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and mouse anti-Rab7 (ab50533 from Abcam).
Flow cytometry and Amnis ImageStream analysis
Flow cytometry and Amnis ImageStream analysis experiments are described in detail in the supplemental Data.
Total cellular heme was detecting according to previously described methods.32-34 Cells were lysed at a density of 106/mL in 2 M oxalic acid (Sigma Aldrich). Lysates were heated to 100°C for 30 minutes and fluorometrically read at excitation/emission wavelengths of 400/662 nm (SpectraMAX Gemini EM; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA).
Transfections and transduction
pLKO.1 shRNA vectors were cotransfected with pCMV-dR8.74 (GAG/POL/TAT/REV) and pMD2.G (VSV-G) in HEK293T cells to generate replication-defective lentivirus. Transduction of cells and puromycin selection was performed as previously described.35 Experimental details of overexpression, lentiviral packaging, reagents, and packaging plasmids are described in supplemental Data.
All animal experiments were approved by the University of Virginia Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The Tfr2Y245X mutant strain was developed in the Fleming laboratory, as described.36 Mcoln1−/− mice (B6.Cg-Mcoln1tm1Sasl/J) were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). Age- and sex-matched littermates were used for all studies. Retroorbital bleeds into EDTA-coated collection tubes were analyzed for complete blood counts on a Hemavet 950 hematology system (Drew Scientific Group, Miami Lakes, FL).
Details of immunofluorescence, gross microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy are described in the supplemental Data.
All statistical analysis was performed with Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). Graphs are displayed as mean of 3 or more independent experiments ± standard error of the mean. Data were analyzed by a 2-tailed Student t test, 1-way ANOVA, or 2-way ANOVA, as indicated. Post hoc analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test for 1-way ANOVA and Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for 2-way ANOVA.
Transferrin traffics to the lysosome in erythroid progenitors
The molecular mechanisms underlying erythroid iron delivery to mitochondria, and particularly whether lineage-specific pathways exist for transferrin trafficking, remain unclear. To address these issues, initial experiments examined the uptake of transferrin in erythroid vs granulocytic progenitors. Using unilineage cultures of primary human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors,37 cells of each lineage (supplemental Figure 1) were incubated with diferric transferrin conjugated with a pH-sensitive fluorochrome (pHrodo RED) to assess transferrin trafficking into acidic compartments. By fluorescence microscopy, erythroid progenitors demonstrated evidence of enhanced transferrin uptake, consistent with their increased intracellular iron demands (Figure 1A). Intracellular distribution in most erythroid progenitors was nonuniform and characterized by clustering of vesicles within a discrete perinuclear compartment (Figure 1A-B, arrows).
To determine the location of these clustered vesicles, erythroid progenitors were incubated with fluorophore-conjugated diferric transferrin and then costained for Lamp1, a marker of multivesicular bodies (MVB) and lysosomes. The transferrin-containing vesicles extensively colocalized with discrete perinuclear Lamp1+ aggregates (Figure 1C), consistent with transferrin trafficking to MVB/lysosomes. To further resolve the subcellular localization of transferrin in erythroblasts, cells were incubated with transferrin conjugated to 10-nm gold particles for uptake and subjected to electron microscopy. Transferrin was largely concentrated adjacent to intraluminal vesicles inside MVB/lysosomes, suggesting specificity of lysosomal entry via back-fusion of maturing endosomes (Figure 1D).38 These findings were confirmed using transferrin conjugates with 30-nm gold particles, which can be visualized at lower magnifications (supplemental Figure 2A), as well as biotin-conjugated transferrin followed by streptavidin-gold staining (supplemental Figure 2B-C). One of the receptors for transferrin, TfR1, traffics predominantly in the recycling endosomal compartment with minimal localization in MVB/lysosomes.39 To further characterize erythroid patterns of transferrin distribution, progenitors were loaded with fluorochrome-conjugated transferrin followed by immunodetection of TfR1. Unexpectedly, transferrin showed relatively low colocalization with TfR1 in erythroid cells, a finding confirmed with 2 independent antibodies (Figures 2A-B; supplemental Figure 3). In stark contrast, granulocytic progenitors showed extensive colocalization of internalized transferrin with TfR1+ vesicles (Figures 2A-B). These findings reveal that the fundamental process of intracellular transferrin trafficking may vary dramatically on the basis of cellular lineage.
TfR2 is required for the lysosomal trafficking of transferrin in erythroblasts
TfR2 is a paralog of TfR1, with strong extracellular homology and 30 times lower binding affinity for holotransferrin.14,40 Clearly involved in iron sensing, a role for TfR2 in transferrin internalization has remained poorly understood. Studies in hepatocytes have shown that TfR2 undergoes lysosomal trafficking, which is enhanced by ligand deprivation.39 To compare the disposition of TfR2 and TfR1 in erythroid progenitors, we monitored the stability of a cohort of surface-labeled proteins in iron-replete culture conditions. Consistent with its extensive recycling, TfR1 showed minimal decline at 3 hours after labeling. In contrast, surface-labeled TfR2 displayed a major decline at 1 hour and almost complete disappearance at 3 hours, consistent with extensive lysosomal trafficking even in the presence of holo-transferrin (Figure 2C).
To determine the contribution of TfR2 to lysosomal trafficking of transferrin, erythroid progenitors subjected to lentiviral shRNA knockdowns (supplemental Figure 4) were loaded with labeled transferrin and imaged by fluorescence microscopy and electron microscopy. In these experiments, knockdown of TfR2 dramatically changed the distribution of fluorochrome-tagged transferrin from peri-nuclear clustered vesicles to nonclustered vesicles distributed uniformly throughout the cell (Figure 2D). Ultrastructural characterization of gold-transferrin localization revealed a shift from MVB/lysosomes to the endosomal compartment in association with TfR2 knockdown (Figure 2E-F). To characterize this shift further, transduced cells loaded with fluorochrome-labeled transferrin underwent immunostaining for TfR1. In these experiments, TfR2 knockdown in erythroblasts enhanced the colocalization of transferrin vesicles with TfR1 (Figure 2G-H). Thus, TfR2 exerts an influence on the intracellular trafficking of transferrin and, in erythroid cells, promotes pathway redirection from the recycling endosome to MVB/lysosome.
Lysosomal interaction with mitochondria is a feature of the erythroid lineage
Based on the evidence for lysosomal iron transport in erythroid progenitors, we used multiple imaging techniques to examine the relationship of lysosomes with mitochondria, the principal site of iron delivery during erythropoiesis. Amnis ImageStream analysis of erythroid progenitors colabeled for markers of surface lineage and internal organelles identified distinct nesting of mitochondria around a central lysosomal cluster (Figure 3A). These structures were not observed in similarly analyzed granulocytic progenitors (supplemental Figure 5A). Quantitative comparisons between the 2 lineages confirmed erythroid cells to have more tightly clustered lysosomes (decreased Lamp1 area), more asymmetry in mitochondrial and lysosomal distribution (increase in XY δ-centroid with respect to nucleus), and greater proximity of mitochondria to lysosomes (decrease in XY δ-centroid) (supplemental Figure 5B-D). Confocal fluorescence microscopy further highlighted the mitochondrial nesting around lysosomal clusters present in erythroid, but not in granulocytic, progenitors (Figure 3B). In addition, the images revealed signal overlap at the interface between the 2 organelle zones in erythroid cells, suggesting potential sites of interorganellar contact.
Electron microscopy confirmed the specialized mitochondrial and lysosomal organization in erythroid progenitors (Figure 3C). Higher-magnification images confirmed direct contacts between mitochondria and lysosomes, with evidence of mitochondrial distortion at sites of contact (Figure 3D, arrow). The frequency of these contacts, an average of 1.5/70-nm cell section, significantly exceeded that of mitochondrial–mitochondrial contacts, suggesting their specificity (Figure 3E). Analysis of cells loaded with gold-labeled transferrin as in Figure 2 further highlighted the direct contact of functional lysosomes with mitochondria (Figure 3F). Emphasizing the importance of lysosomal transport in the delivery of mitochondrial iron, total heme content was significantly reduced in erythroid progenitors treated with bafilomycin, an inhibitor of lysosomal transport and function (Figure 3G). A caveat of these experiments is that bafilomycin may affect TfR1-mediated transport as well. Importantly, an ultrastructural comparison of erythroid and granulocytic progenitors revealed the mitochondria-lysosomal contacts to be enriched in the erythroid lineage (supplemental Figure 3H-I).
TfR2 influences erythroid mitochondrial structure
Prior studies have shown impaired mitochondrial iron uptake to be associated with decreased organelle size.41 To examine the influence of TfR2 on mitochondria morphology, the erythroid cell line K562 underwent shRNA knockdown followed by Amnis ImageStream quantitative analysis. In these studies, TfR2 knockdown clearly reduced mitotracker staining of cells, consistent with TfR2 regulation of mitochondrial mass (Figure 4A). Ultrastructural studies of marrow cells from wild-type and Tfr2Y245X murine strains further confirmed that TfR2 loss resulted in erythroid cells with reduced mitochondria size (Figure 4B-C). In contrast, granulocytes from Tfr2Y245X mice were unaffected in mitochondrial size, suggesting the erythroid defects are TfR2-dependent (Figure 4B-C).
An ultrastructural hallmark of intramitochondrial iron stored in mitoferritin consists of electron-dense foci within the mitochondrial matrix.42-48 In human hematopoietic progenitors, such foci were readily identified in erythroid mitochondria (Figure 4D). Notably, TfR2 knockdown in erythroblasts reduced the number of foci per mitochondria (Figure 4D-E). To assess the contribution of TfR2 and TfR1 to mitochondrial iron uptake, erythroid progenitors were subjected to either TfR2 or TfR1 knockdown (supplemental Figure 6A) and analyzed for total heme content. Transduced cells showed no significant difference in CD36 and GPA expression, markers of earlier and later erythroid differentiation (supplemental Figure 6B). Both TfR2 and TfR1 knockdown significantly reduced total heme content (Figure 4F). Thus, TfR2 in erythroid cells showed an influence on multiple mitochondrial parameters including size, matrix deposits, and heme content.
Erythroid roles for lysosomal and mitochondrial factors coregulated with TfR2
Our results have implicated the lysosomal compartment as an intermediate in erythroid iron flux, suggesting the existence of downstream pathway elements involved in lysosomal–mitochondrial iron transfer. Notably, the lysosomal divalent cation channel Mucolipin-1 has recently been demonstrated to mediate lysosomal iron efflux.24 To assess the role of Mucolipin-1 in erythropoiesis in vivo, heterozygous intercrosses were used to generate Mcoln1−/− mice. As compared with littermate controls, Mcoln1−/− mice displayed reductions in red blood cell counts, hemoglobin levels, and hematocrit (Figure 5A). Their anemia was associated with evidence of decreased marrow erythropoiesis, including gross pallor of the femur and increased proportion of marrow myeloid progenitors, as assessed by hematoxylin and eosin stain (Figure 5B-C). Flow cytometry of the marrow further demonstrated decreased erythropoiesis (Figure 5D-E). Electron microscopy on bone marrow revealed smaller mitochondria in erythroblasts from Mcoln1−/− mice (Figure 5F-G). This defect was erythroid-specific, as granulocytes from Mcoln1−/− mice demonstrated larger mitochondria than those in wild-type granulocytes.
Similar expression patterns of genes can provide insight into cooperative functions. In the BloodSpot (http://servers.binf.ku.dk/bloodspot) normal human hematopoiesis (differentiation map [DMAP]) database, transcripts of MCOLN1 show dynamic lineage- and stage-specific modulation identical to that of TFR2 (Figure 6A).49 CTSB, the gene encoding the lysosomal cathepsin B protease, and SLC11A2, the gene encoding DMT1, demonstrated similar modulation of expression (supplemental Figure 7A), supporting the existence of a cohort of coregulated lysosomal and mitochondrial genes involved in stage-specific events in erythropoiesis. To identify additional candidate factors involved in erythroid mitochondrial iron delivery, we used the BloodSpot Gene Correlations function, which calculates the Pearson’s correlation of all gene signatures, to identify the top genes that correlated in expression pattern with MCOLN1.49 The top 2 genes were MFN2, encoding Mitofusin-2, a mitochondrial outer membrane protein involved in mitochondria-endoplasmic reticulum contacts,50 and ATPV0C, a V-ATPase that contributes to vesicular acidification and lysosomal activity51 (Figure 6B).49 Visualizing MFN2 expression on a hierarchical differentiation tree heat map revealed an expression pattern identical to those of TFR2 and MCOLN1, with dramatic upregulation in the intermediate-stage CD34− CD71+ GPA− erythroid progenitors, followed by strong downregulation in later-stage CD34− CD71lo GPA+ erythroid cells (supplemental Figure 7B).
Prior implication of Mitofusin-2 in mitochondrial contacts with the endoplasmic reticulum50 and lysosomal fusion with autophagosomes52 suggested a potential role in the formation of mitochondria–lysosomal contacts in erythroblasts. To examine this possibility, lentiviral shRNA knockdowns were performed on primary human erythroid progenitors (Figure 6C), followed by ultrastructural analysis. In these experiments, Mitofusin-2 knockdown reduced the numbers of direct contacts between mitochondria and lysosomes (Figure 6D-E). Analysis of total heme content in these cells demonstrated reduced heme with Mitofusin-2 knockdown (Figure 6F). Further, knocking down Mitofusin-2 in stage-fixed K562 and HUDEP-2 cells similarly reduced total heme content (Figure 6F). Flow cytometry of transduced progenitors differentiated down the erythroid lineage demonstrated impaired upregulation of GPA and CD36 with MFN-2 knockdown, suggesting blockade of erythroid differentiation (Figure 6G).
We sought to examine the potential for a physical interaction between TfR2, MFN2, and Rab7, a lysosome-associated protein. Analyzing lysates from K562 cells, we observed coimmunoprecipitation between endogenous TfR2 and Rab7, also observing some immunoprecipitation of TfR2 with Mitofusin-2 (supplemental Figure 7C). Immunoprecipitation of tagged recombinant TfR2 verified the physical interaction with Rab7 (supplemental Figure 7D). Antibody limitations precluded the study of endogenous MCOLN1.
Intracellular trafficking of iron and transferrin has been extensively studied, with many of the critical pathway components identified. Erythroid cells, however, display unique requirements for high-efficiency mitochondrial iron delivery to support rapid and abundant heme synthesis while minimizing exposure to oxidative stress. A key aspect of this specialized “pipeline” appears to consist of interorganellar transfer, in which iron transits from endosomes to mitochondria while bypassing exposure to the chelatable cytosolic compartment.4 An erythroid role for the canonical TfR1-mediated recycling endosomal pathway has been supported by the profound anemias associated with mutations in Tfrc, Slc11a2, Steap3, or Sec15l1.53 However, the molecular basis for directed transfer of iron from endosomes to mitochondria remains unclear, and erythroid-specific participants in this process have hitherto not been identified. Furthermore, the residual erythropoiesis present in animals lacking TfR1 (Tfrc) or DMT1 (Slc11a2) supports the existence of additional noncanonical pathways for erythroid mitochondrial iron delivery.7,9
Results from this study identify an erythroid-specific, TfR2-dependent route for transferrin uptake and lysosomal delivery. Others have described TfR2-dependent trafficking of transferrin to the lysosome in nonerythroid cells.13,21,39 These findings are consistent with the distinguishing characteristics of TfR2 as a tissue-specific receptor that undergoes rapid lysosomal trafficking, in contrast to the ubiquitously expressed TfR1 that undergoes obligate recycling.54 Our data also identify an erythroid-specific organelle configuration involving mitochondrial clustering around a central lysosomal core with frequent membrane contact sites between the 2 organelle types. Although the pathway may involve additional steps of iron trafficking between the lysosome and mitochondria, these structures may offer a dedicated direct pathway for mitochondrial iron transfer via lysosomal transit. Further supporting the lineage specificity of such a pathway is the dynamic coregulation with TfR2 of a cohort of factors involved in lysosome function, lysosomal iron export, and mitochondrial contact formation: ATP6V0C, Cathepsin-B, Mucolipin-1, and Mitofusin-2. Specifically, transcripts encoding these factors show highly restricted and coordinated expression in human erythroblasts at the CD34− CD71+ GPA+ stage of development (Figure 6). Prior studies in reticulocytes have identified brief, transient endosomal contacts with mitochondria as a potential means of interorganellar iron delivery.5 Whether this “kiss and run” mechanism pertains to trafficking in polychromatophilic erythroblasts during peak iron flux remains undetermined. The random and sporadic endosomal–mitochondrial contacts associated with “kiss and run” make this mechanism unfit solely to meet all demands associated with high-amplitude heme biosynthesis. Assembly of stable lysosomal-mitochondrial contacts at the stage of peak iron flux provides an erythroid-specific support mechanism to assist in efficient and accurate mitochondrial iron delivery.
Although TfR2 expression is dispensable for erythropoiesis, mice with bone marrow knockout of Tfr2 have microcytic red cells, consistent with impaired iron-loading.17 Our data in human erythroid progenitors show that TfR2 affects intracellular distribution of transferrin, but not overall uptake (Figure 2), supporting the existence of multiple distinct but overlapping pathways for iron use in this lineage. The strong influence of TfR2 on erythroid transferrin trafficking may seem paradoxical in light of its low ligand-binding affinity as compared with TfR1.14 However, ligand internalization may also be influenced by surface receptor abundance and internalization rates. Furthermore, plasma levels of circulating holotransferrin are approximately 100 times higher than the dissociation constant (Kd) of the TfR2-holotransferrin interaction, which likely overwhelms affinity differences between TfR2 and TfR1 and predicts full-ligand saturation of TfR2. Finally, TfR2 could regulate transferrin trafficking in an indirect manner through binding and regulating factors involved in endosomal transport.
Our study identifies MFN2 as a critical erythroid gene coregulated with TFR2 and required for differentiation. The protein product, Mitofusin-2, participates in several aspects of mitochondrial remodeling including fusion, contact formation with other organelles such as endoplasmic reticulum, and autophagy.50,52,55,56 MFN2 is downregulated in progenitors from patients with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts,57 a myelodysplastic syndrome with mitochondrial iron overload, suggesting feedback regulation by mitochondrial iron levels. The functions of Mitofusin-2 relevant for erythroid differentiation remain unestablished. One intriguing possibility is that developing erythroblasts co-opt components of the autophagy machinery to promote assembly of lysosomal–mitochondrial networks that support differentiation. Supporting this notion, Mitofusin-2 participates in lysosomal fusion events,52,58 and additional autophagy factors, ATG7 and Nix, have been found to contribute to early stages of erythropoiesis.59,60 Importantly, our ultrastructural studies show that the lysosomal–mitochondrial contacts within proliferating erythroblasts do not represent bona fide autophagy. An autophagy-related process of holo-ferritin catabolism, ferritinophagy, has also been implicated as a route for erythroid iron trafficking.23 However, the absence of hematologic abnormalities in mice lacking ferritin heavy chain suggest this process is dispensable for erythropoiesis.61
In addition to a role in supporting heme synthesis, TfR2-mediated mitochondrial iron delivery might also provide a sensing mechanism. Extracellular iron sensing by TfR2 is known to regulate hepcidin production and erythropoiesis,17,62,63 but the molecular basis for these functions has not been identified. An established sensor highly responsive to intracellular iron fluctuation consists of mitochondrial aconitase, an iron-sulfur cluster enzyme that mediates the erythroid iron restriction response.37,64,65 Rapid and continuous mitochondrial delivery of extracellular iron via lysosomal trafficking of TfR2-transferrin would enable ongoing calibration of critical metabolic activity in accordance with extracellular environment. In this manner, TfR2 modulation of mitochondrial aconitase activity could enable dynamic responsiveness of erythropoiesis to circulating iron availability.
The full-text version of this article contains a data supplement.
The authors thank David Chan, Paul Schmidt, and Merino Zerial for providing plasmids; Joanne Lannigan and the University of Virginia Flow Cytometry Core Facility for assistance with flow cytometry; Stacey Criswell, Yalin Wang, Kelly Barford, and the University of Virginia Advanced Microscopy Facility for assistance with microscopy; and David Castle and Bettina Winckler for reviewing the manuscript.
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01 DK079924, R01 DK101550, and R01 DK095112), the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS NIA-8988-15), the University of Virginia Farrow Fellowship associated with National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA44579, and the Medical Scientist Training Program at the University of Virginia (5T32GM007267-38).
Contribution: S.K. designed and performed experiments, interpreted data, and wrote the manuscript; M.H. and S.G. performed experiments, interpreted data, and edited the manuscript; R.F. provided the Tfr2Y245X mutant animals and edited the manuscript; R.K. and Y.N. developed the HUDEP-2 system; and A.G. designed experiments, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: R.F. has served on the scientific advisory board for Protagonist, a biotechnology company developing products to manipulate the hepcidin-ferroportin axis. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.
Correspondence: Adam Goldfarb, Department of Pathology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, PO Box 800904, Charlottesville, VA 22908; e-mail: email@example.com.