Abstract

Busulfan (BU) dose adjustment following therapeutic drug concentration monitoring improves outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Further improvement could be achieved through genotype-based BU dose adjustments. Studies with large and homogeneous samples are essential to establish the utility of genetic factors as a predictor of BU dose and outcomes of HSCT. In this multicentric study, we included 139 children aged between 0.1 to 19.9 years (65 females) receiving BU based myeloablative conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic HSCT. Genetic predictors of BU plasma levels, dose adjustment, and clinical outcomes post HSCT were prospectively evaluated. Patients received BU in a conventional 6 h dosing schedule as a two hours infusion for four days in combination with cyclophosphamide (CY; n=106), or CY and etoposide (15) or melphalan and CY (15).The remaining patients received BU with melphalan (2) or fludarabine (1). BU first dose pharmacokinetic parameters (PKs) in patients were estimated and were adjusted to steady state concentrations (Css) of 600-900 ng/mL. All the patients were genotyped for defining GSTA1*A1,*A2, *B1 and *B2 haplotypes, GSTM1, GSTT1 null alleles, CYP2C9*2,*3, CYP2C19*2,*17, CYP2B6*5, *9 and GSTP1 1578A>G, GSTP1 2293 C>T polymorphisms. Standard criteria were followed for defining clinical outcomes of HSCT such as neutrophil recovery, platelet recovery, acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD), sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), event-free survival (EFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), hemorrhagic cystitis (HC), and graft failure (Ther Drug Monit. 2014;36:93-9; Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013; 48:939-46; Pharmacogenomics J. 2014; 14:263-71). PKs such as BU clearance (CL), area under the curve concentration (AUC), and Css were compared among genotype groups using non-parametric tests. The PKs and genetic variants or haplotypes were also associated with the clinical outcomes individually or in combinations in both univariate and multivariate analysis. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Higher BU CL, and lower AUC and Css levels were seen in GSTA1*A2 carriers compared to the other patients (p<0.05). The effect was more apparent in patients with malignancies (n=86; p<0.02) and in females (n=65; p<0.01). Patients with two GSTA1*A2 copies needed a higher BU dose adjustment than the other patients (p=0.01). Higher incidences of NRM (26.1 vs 5.7 %, p<0.0001) and lower EFS in patients with BU Css above median 631.0 ng/mL (21.4 vs 55.1%, p<0.0001, 70 patients had first dose Css above 631 ng/mL) has also been documented. Higher frequency of SOS was seen in individuals with two copies of GSTA1*B haplotype (28.6 Vs 8.6%; p=0.02). Higher incidences of aGVHD grade I-IV was seen in homozygous carriers of GSTA1*B haplotype (61.5 vs 30.4 %; p=0.008) and seems to be further increased in patients having also GSTP1 1578 GG genotype (75% Vs 32.2 %; p=0.006). Patients with malignancies carrying both GSTM1 and T1 null genotype had lower EFS compared to the remaining patients (n=86; 11.1 vs 59.7 %, p<0.0001). Higher incidences of HC before day 30 was seen in individuals with GSTM1 functional alleles compared to null allele carriers (n=138; 23.4 Vs 8.2 %; p=0.01) and was further potentiated through interaction with CYP2C9 (n=104; 25.7 Vs 5.8 %; p=0.004). In pediatric patients receiving conditioning regimen based on two alkylating agents with BU as one of the components, dosing algorithms for BU based on demographics and GSTA1 haplotype may improve the outcomes of HSCT. These observations also indicate that therapeutic window of BU in children might not be similar to that of adult patients especially in GSTM1 and T1 null allele carriers. This data also highlight that presence of both GSTM1 and T1 null genotypes are the independent risk factors for the occurrence of events in malignant patients receiving HSCT.

Disclosures

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

This icon denotes a clinically relevant abstract