Commitment to glycolysis sustains survival of NO-producing inflammatory dendritic cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) express TLRs that allow them to detect and respond to pathogen-derived molecules.^1,2  In response to TLR agonists, DCs transition from a resting state to an activated state through a process that that involves the induction of expression of genes encoding a broad array of proteins such as cytokines, chemokines, and costimulatory molecules.³  Activated DCs play a central role in orchestrating the development of immune responses.

Recently, we showed that after exposure to TLR agonists, DCs undergo a striking metabolic transition evident as a pronounced increase in the glycolytic rate.⁴  This is highly reminiscent of Warburg metabolism,⁵  in which tumor cells preferentially use glycolysis rather than catabolic mitochondrial pathways to conserve and generate metabolic resources to meet the demands of cellular proliferation while still producing sufficient ATP to permit these processes to occur.^6,7  Moreover, the increase in glycolytic rate in DCs was found to be dependent on the PI3K/Akt pathway,⁴  which is one of the most commonly mutated signaling pathways in tumors.⁸  We reasoned that glycolysis could serve essentially the same purpose in active DCs as it is thought to do in tumors.⁴  This view was supported by the fact that glucose restriction inhibits severely the activation and life span of DCs exposed to TLR agonists.⁴  However, unlike in most cancers, which continue to consume oxygen at rates comparable to normal tissues despite increased glycolytic rates,⁹  activated DCs use significantly less oxygen than do resting DCs.⁴  Thus far, the molecular mechanisms underlying mitochondrial impairment in activated DCs, and the metabolic consequences of the loss of mitochondrial function, remain unclear.

To address these issues, we have in the present study, undertaken a detailed analysis of mitochondrial function in DCs after TLR stimulation. Using extracellular flux analysis to measure changes in oxygen consumption in real time, we found that 6 hours after stimulation, mitochondrial oxygen consumption was progressively lost due to the initiation of NO production. By 24 hours after exposure to TLR agonists, mitochondria in NO-producing DCs exhibit no evidence of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) or of an active tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. We show that the switch to sustained glycolytic metabolism by activated DCs in vitro and monocyte-derived inflammatory DCs (moDCs) in vivo is a response to the inhibition of respiration by NO and is essential for DC function and survival because it provides essential ATP in the absence of a functioning respiratory chain.

Wild-type, inducible NO synthase–knockout (iNOS^−/−), ovalbumin-specific CD4 (OT-II)–, and or CD8 (OT-I)–transgenic C57Bl/6 mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory, and re-derived stocks were maintained at the Trudeau Institute and Washington University (St Louis, MO) under specific pathogen-free conditions under protocols approved by the institutional animal care and use committee.

BM-derived DCs were generated as described previously.¹⁰  Briefly, BM cells were differentiated in the presence of GM-CSF (20 ng/mL) in complete DC medium (RPMI containing 10% FCS, 100 U/mL of penicillin/ streptomycin, and 2mM l-glutamine) for 6 days. Inflammatory moDCs were elicited in vivo by infecting mice intravenously with a sublethal dose of 2 × 10⁵ CFUs of the attenuated ΔActA strain of Listeria monocytogenes.¹¹  One or 2 days after infection, spleens were harvested and digested at 37°C for 20 minutes in RPMI with collagenase D (1 mg/mL; Roche) in the presence of DNAse I (20 μg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich). Spleens were put through 70-μm strainers to generate single-cell suspensions and RBCs were lysed with ACK lysis buffer (0.15M NH₄Cl, 1mM KHCO₃, and 0.1mM EDTA). Where indicated, 1-day L monocytogenes–infected mice were injected intraperitoneally with PBS or 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG; 4 g/kg) and 6 hours later spleens were harvested for analysis of DC subsets. Inflammatory moDCs were tracked and isolated from splenocytes based on CD11c, MHC-II (H2-IA/E^b), Ly6C^hi, and CD11b^int expression. Two resident DC populations were isolated from single-cell suspensions prepared from spleens of naive mice based on CD11c, MHC-II (H2-IA/E^b), and either CD11b and CD4 or DEC205 and CD8α expression. All in vivo DC populations were isolated using an influx sorter (BD Biosciences).

Day 6 BM-derived DCs or isolated splenic DCs were washed in complete DC medium and, where indicated, pulsed with the TLR4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS; Escherichia coli serotype 0111:B4,;100 ng/mL; Sigma-Aldrich); TLR1/2 agonist Pam3CSK4 (1 μg/mL), TLR3 agonist poly(I:C) (10 μg/mL), TLR7/8 agonist R848 (1 μg/mL), and TLR9 agonist CpG (5 μg/mL; all InvivoGen); rTNF-α (10 ng/mL,), rIFN-γ (10 ng/mL; both PeproTech) in the presence or absence of NOS inhibitor S-ethyl-isothiourea (SEITU, 500μM; Cayman Chemical). In experiments in which glucose in the medium was replaced by galactose, glucose-free RPMI and dialyzed FCS were used to ensure the absence of glucose in the culture media.

DCs were treated for 6 hours with LPS in the presence or absence of ovalbumin (1 mg/mL of endotoxin-free egg white prepared in the laboratory) and washed. Then, 2 × 10⁴ pulsed DCs were cultured with 2 × 10⁵ CFSE-labeled CD62L^hiCD44^lo naive OT-II or OT-I T cells. T-cell proliferation was assessed by CFSE dilution by FACS.

Glucose and lactate levels in the medium were measured using a glucose assay kit and a lactate assay kit (Eton Bioscience) per the manufacturer's instructions. For real-time analysis of the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) and the oxygen consumption rate (OCR), DCs were analyzed using an XF-24 and XF-96 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience). In brief, DCs were plated in XF-24 or XF-96 cell culture plates (2 × 10⁵ cells/well in 200 μL or 7 × 10⁴ cells/well in 70 μL) and either left unstimulated or stimulated with indicated TLR ligands. At the indicated time points, DCs were washed and analyzed in XF Running Buffer (unbuffered RPMI, 10mM glucose, 10% FCS, 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 2mM l-glutamine, and 20 ng/mL of GM-CSF) per the manufacturer's instructions to obtain real-time measurements of OCR and ECAR. Where indicated, ECAR and/or OCR were analyzed in response to 1μM oligomycin, 1.5μM fluoro-carbonyl cyanide phenylhydrazone (FCCP) and 100 nM rotenone plus 1μM antimycin A (all Sigma-Aldrich); 500μM SEITU, 250μM NO donor S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP; Invitrogen), 50 ng/mL of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (Sigma-Aldrich) or 10μM NADPH oxidase inhibitor apocynin (Sigma-Aldrich). For ATP analysis, DCs were treated as indicated for 24 hours, after which time cells were washed and resuspended in 100 μL of PBS. Samples were boiled for 5 minutes and relative ATP levels were determined using an ATP determination kit (Invitrogen) per the manufacturer's instructions. For glucose-tracing experiments, DCs were stimulated for 21 hours with LPS or left unstimulated, followed by 3 hours of pulse labeling with ¹³C₆-glucose (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) or natural ¹²C-glucose, and intracellular metabolites were extracted by washing in ice-cold methanol as described previously.¹²  Next, 200 μL of methanol extract was evaporated to dryness and treated with 80 μL of N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (10% trimethylchlorosilane; Regis) and heated at 70°C for 1 hour to convert the metabolites to their trimethylsilyl derivatives. Authentic citrate was purchased (Sigma-Aldrich), converted to the trimethylsilyl form, and used to determine gas chromatography retention times and its positive chemical ionization fragmentation pattern. Derivatized standards and samples were injected (2 μL) onto a DB-XLB (30 m, 0.25 mm internal diameter, 0.25-μm film) column (Agilent Technologies) and nominal mass/charge (m/z) for molecular and fragment ions were monitored using a mass selective detector (6890 gas chromatograph and 5973 quadrupole mass spectrometer; Agilent Technologies). Selected ion monitoring was used to quantify m/z signal intensities for citrate: 465-471. Signal intensities (¹³C species/natural ¹²C species) for citrate were calculated and compared among experimental conditions.

Fluorochrome-conjugated Abs for surface staining for FACS analysis and 7-amino-actinomycin D were purchased from BD Biosciences except for anti-CD11c and anti-CD40, which were obtained from eBiosciences. For intracellular staining of iNOS, DCs were fixed in 4% ultrapure paraformaldehyde, stained for 1 hour at room temperature with mouse anti-NOS2 (clone C-11; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and rat anti–mouse IgG1-APC (BD Biosciences) in 0.2% saponin buffer. Mitochondrial membrane potential was determined using 20μM 3,3′-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide (DiOC₆; Invitrogen) and superoxide (O₂⁻) production using 1μM dihydroethidium (Sigma-Aldrich) in the FITC and PE channels, respectively, after 20 minutes of incubation at 37°C. Cytokine concentrations in supernatants of 24-hour TLR-stimulated DCs were determined using cytometric bead array (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were analyzed on a FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).

RNA isolations were done using the RNeasy kit (QIAGEN) and single-strand cDNA was synthesized using a high-capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems). Primers were purchased from Applied Biosystems and real-time PCR was performed by the TaqMan method using an Applied Biosystems 7500 sequence detection system. The expression levels of mRNA were normalized to the expression of a housekeeping gene (β-actin). To determine mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)/nuclear DNA (nDNA) ratios, genomic DNA was extracted using the phenol-chloroform method. Primers for CO1 (forward: 5′-TGCTAGCCGCAGGCATTAC-3′ and reverse: 5′-GGGTGCCCAAAGAATCAGAAC-3′) and NDUFV1 (forward: 5′-CTTCCCCACTGGCCTCAAG-3′ and reverse: 5′-CCAAAACCCAGTGATCCAGC-3′) were used to quantify mtDNA and nDNA, respectively.¹³  Real-time PCR was performed based on SYBR Green using an Applied Biosystems 7500 sequence detection system.

Data were analyzed using Prism Version 5 software (GraphPad). Comparisons for 2 groups were calculated using unpaired 2-tailed Student t tests. A 2-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni posttest was used for the glucose-tracing experiment. Differences were considered significant at P < .05.

Our previous work indicated that OXPHOS was significantly decreased in BM-derived DCs at 24 hours after exposure to TLR agonists.⁴  To determine when after activation this decline in mitochondrial activity occurs, we used extracellular flux analysis to perform detailed measurements of mitochondrial OCR over time after exposure to the TLR4 ligand LPS. These analyses revealed that OCR did not decrease immediately after TLR stimulation, but instead was slightly increased during the first 6 hours after TLR ligation, after which a pronounced decline in OCR was observed that was sustained until at least 24 hours (Figure 1A). A detailed analysis of OCR in DCs at 24 hours after activation revealed the extent of mitochondrial loss of function. Whereas resting DCs showed characteristic changes in OCR in response to inhibition of the mitochondrial ATP-synthase by oligomycin, uncoupling of OXPHOS from ATP synthesis by FCCP and inhibition of the electron transport chain (ETC) by antimycin-A/rotenone (explained in supplemental Figure 1, available on the Blood Web site; see the Supplemental Materials link at the top of the online article), DCs that had been activated for 24 hours by LPS were entirely nonresponsive to these drugs (Figure 1B). Consistent with these observations, O₂⁻ production (Figure 1C) and mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ_m; Figure 1D), indicators of ETC use,¹⁴  were significantly reduced in these cells. This phenomenon was not specific to TLR4-activated DCs, because other TLR agonists (with the exception of the TLR1/2 agonist Pam3cys) induced similar declines in mitochondrial respiration in these DCs (supplemental Figure 2A).

OXPHOS is fueled by the TCA cycle. To determine whether a loss in mitochondrial respiration was paralleled by an impairment in function of the TCA cycle, activated DCs were cultured in the presence of ¹³C₆-glucose as their only glucose source, and the accumulation of ¹³C in citrate, the first TCA-cycle intermediate to receive glycolysis-derived carbon through acetyl-CoA,¹⁵  was determined using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. In resting DCs, citrate was highly enriched for ¹³C compared with control DCs cultured with natural ¹²C-glucose (Figure 1E). However, ¹³C incorporation into citrate in 24-hour LPS-activated cells was indistinguishable in cells cultured with ¹³C₆-glucose versus natural ¹²C-glucose, indicating that the flow of glucose carbon through the TCA cycle was halted in LPS-activated DCs. These data are consistent with the decrease in OCR and mitochondrial membrane potential in activated DCs, and support the view that TLR-signaling results in a profound decline in mitochondrial activity.

The striking decline in mitochondrial processes in DCs that had been activated with LPS for 24 hours raised the possibility that these cells had cleared their mitochondria by mitophagy.¹⁶  However, the ratio of mtDNA to nDNA was equivalent in resting and activated DCs (Figure 1F), indicating that LPS activation did not reduce the number of mitochondria per cell. These data indicate that after an early increase in mitochondrial respiration during the first 6 hours, TLR-mediated activation of DCs leads to a persistent and profound collapse in mitochondrial function that is characterized by the absence of a functional ETC and glucose-carbon flux through the mitochondrial TCA cycle.

Nonmitochondrial OCR, revealed by treatment with antimycin-A/rotenone, was higher in LPS-activated cells than in resting DCs (Figure 1B). Outside of the mitochondrion, oxygen can be consumed in the generation of reactive oxygen species and NO by NADPH oxidase and NOS, respectively.^17,18  Because reactive oxygen species and NO have been reported to inhibit mitochondrial function in other systems,^19,20  we investigated whether these processes could also play a role in this situation. Although NAPDH oxidase was functionally expressed in BM-derived DCs²¹  (Figure 2A), specific inhibition of this enzyme complex had no effect on nonmitochondrial oxygen consumption (Figure 2B), suggesting that this enzyme is not active and does not play a role in impairment of mitochondrial function in these cells. With regard to NOS, consistent with previous reports,²² NOS2 mRNA (Figure 2C) and iNOS protein expression (Figure 2D) were readily detectable in LPS-activated DCs, but not in resting DCs. iNOS expression and concomitant NO production could also be detected to various degrees in DCs activated by agonists of TLR1/2, TLR3, TLR7/8, and TLR9 (supplemental Figure 2B-C). The induction of expression of iNOS (Figure 2E) and NO production (Figure 2F) coincided in time with the onset in loss of mitochondrial function (Figure 1A). Consistent with this, inhibition of iNOS with the potent NOS inhibitor SEITU reduced nonmitochondrial OCR in LPS-stimulated but not unstimulated cells (Figure 2G), indicating that most nonmitochondrial oxygen consumption in activated DCs is due to iNOS activity.

To address whether NO generated by iNOS underlies the loss of mitochondrial function, DCs were stimulated with LPS in the presence or absence of SEITU. SEITU treatment totally blocked NO production by DCs (Figure 3A). Strikingly, when iNOS function in LPS-stimulated DCs was inhibited, mitochondrial respiration, as assessed by extracellular flux analysis, was fully restored to the normal profile characteristic of functional mitochondria (Figure 3B). Likewise, LPS-activated iNOS^−/− DCs retained a normal OCR response profile (Figure 3C), ΔΨ_m (Figure 3D), and mitochondrial O₂⁻ production (Figure 3E). The inhibition of mitochondrial respiration in LPS-activated DCs was a direct effect of NO production by iNOS, because treatment of LPS-stimulated DCs in the presence of SEITU and an exogenous NO donor (SNAP) resulted in functional mitochondrial collapse (Figure 3F). Finally, the inhibitory effects of NO on OXPHOS were reversible, because SEITU treatment of DCs 24 hours after LPS stimulation restored mitochondrial respiration (Figure 3G), confirming that viable mitochondria persist in LPS-activated DCs for at least 24 hours.

To determine whether the commitment to glycolytic metabolism in DCs in response to LPS stimulation⁴  is a direct result of the loss of mitochondrial respiration due to NO production, we analyzed the ECAR as an indication of lactate production and the glycolytic rate of DCs 24 hours after LPS stimulation in the presence or absence of SEITU. Consistent with our previous findings,⁴  LPS stimulation resulted in a significantly increased ECAR (Figure 4A). However, when iNOS was inhibited, LPS-activated DCs displayed an ECAR comparable to that of resting DCs (Figure 4A). The absence of an increase in glycolytic rate in LPS- and SEITU-treated DCs was confirmed by analysis of glucose consumption (Figure 4B) and lactate production (Figure 4C). The causal link between inhibition of OXPHOS and the increase in glycolytic rate was further substantiated by the finding that treatment of unstimulated DCs with drugs that interfere with mitochondrial respiration or with the NO donor SNAP resulted in an increase in ECAR (Figure 4D).

We showed previously that glucose deprivation or inhibition of glycolysis through the addition of an inhibitory glucose analog, 2-DG, inhibited the ability of DCs to become activated in response to LPS.⁴  On the basis of these results, we concluded that a sustained commitment to glycolytic metabolism is essential to allow DC activation. However, whereas glycolytic rates at 24 hours after activation were no higher than in resting cells when NO production was inhibited (Figure 4A-C), DC activation under these conditions was unimpaired or even enhanced, as determined by surface expression of MHC-I, MHC-II, and costimulatory molecules (Figure 4E), cytokine production (Figure 4F), and T cell–activating capacity (Figure 4G).

We also addressed the role of glycolysis in LPS-stimulated DCs that have lost mitochondrial function. We reasoned that in the absence of OXPHOS, DCs cannot generate ATP through mitochondrial respiration and thus would be dependent on glycolysis for ATP generation. Despite the absence of OXPHOS-derived ATP, LPS-stimulated DCs had higher cellular ATP levels than resting DCs (Figure 5A), suggesting that the increase in glycolytic rate in these cells generates sufficient ATP to more than compensate for the lack of mitochondrial ATP production. Confirmation that ATP was generated by glycolysis in these experiments was obtained by experiments in which glucose in DC cultures 24 hours after LPS activation was replaced by galactose to prevent a net ATP yield through glycolysis.²³  Under these conditions, ATP levels decreased by more than 90% in 15 minutes, showing the heavy reliance of these cells on glycolysis for ATP production (Figure 5B). In contrast, in unstimulated DCs or LPS-stimulated iNOS^−/− DCs in which mitochondrial function is normal, galactose treatment resulted in only a 30% reduction in ATP levels (Figure 5B). Most importantly, the generation of ATP through glycolysis was found to be essential for DC survival after LPS activation of wild-type, but not iNOS^−/− DCs (Figure 5C). These data show that the increase in glycolytic metabolism in LPS-activated DCs is a direct consequence of a NO-induced blockade in OXPHOS and that the compensatory increase in glycolytic rate is essential for ATP generation to prevent cell death.

GM-CSF–cultured BM-derived DCs are considered a model for in vivo inflammatory moDCs that differentiate from circulating inflammatory monocytes in response to inflammation and infection.²⁴  Inflammatory moDCs have been studied extensively during L monocytogenes infection, where they have been shown to express iNOS.¹¹  To begin to address whether L monocytogenes–elicited inflammatory moDCs display iNOS-dependent metabolic changes similar to those observed in activated BM-derived DCs, we isolated CD11c⁺CD11b^intMHCII⁺Ly6C^hi cells from the spleens of mice that had been infected with L monocytogenes 2 days earlier and cultured them with and without LPS. Consistent with previous findings,¹¹  a proportion of these inflammatory DCs expressed iNOS, which was increased in response to LPS exposure in vitro (Figure 6A). These cells also produced iNOS-derived NO immediately ex vivo, which was elevated in response to LPS (Figure 6B). In contrast, conventional DCs (cDCs) isolated from the spleens of naive mice did not express iNOS and could not be induced to do so by LPS stimulation (Figure 6A) or by stimulation with other TLR agonists or inflammatory cytokines (supplemental Figure 3).²⁵  Most importantly, the OCR of LPS-activated inflammatory moDCs was largely nonresponsive to oligomycin, FCCP, and antimycin-A/rotenone, but baseline OCR and responsiveness to these drugs was restored by the inhibition of NO synthesis (Figure 6C). Therefore, inflammatory moDCs exhibit a striking NO-dependent reduction in OXPHOS accompanied by an NO-dependent shift toward glycolytic metabolism that was not apparent in splenic cDCs (Figure 6D). Finally, given the importance of glycolysis for survival of iNOS-expressing DCs in vitro, we predicted that inflammatory moDCs would depend on glycolysis for survival in vivo. To investigate this, L monocytogenes–infected mice were injected with 2-DG to block glycolysis and then the frequencies of splenic DC subsets were analyzed. Whereas CD4⁺ and CD8α⁺ cDC and total inflammatory moDC frequencies were not altered by 2-DG treatment (Figure 6E), the frequency of iNOS-expressing inflammatory moDCs was significantly reduced (Figure 6F-G), supporting the notion that commitment to glycolysis is essential for the survival of iNOS-expressing DCs in vivo.

DCs are a heterogeneous family of cells that are crucial in the initiation of inflammation and the induction of adaptive immune responses.²⁶  A key feature that allows DCs to perform these functions is their ability to recognize and respond to pathogen- and danger-associated molecular patterns through receptor systems such as the TLRs. In the absence of TLR agonists, DCs are quiescent, but after TLR stimulation, the cells become activated and begin producing inflammatory mediators and expressing molecules that allow them to activate other cells within the immune system.²  We reported previously that activation of BM-derived DCs in response to TLR agonists is accompanied by a change in their metabolism, characterized by a persisting switch from OXPHOS to aerobic glycolysis, and found that inhibition of this process had profound negative effects on activation and cellular survival.⁴  We hypothesized that DCs commit to glycolysis because this is the only metabolic pathway able to support the metabolic and bioenergetic challenges of enacting the activation pathway. Using real-time metabolic assays, we showed in the present study that the early stage of DC activation in response to TLR agonists is accompanied by an increase in mitochondrial activity, but that this is transient and followed by functional mitochondrial collapse. We also showed that the onset of mitochondrial dysfunction coincides with the expression of TLR-driven iNOS expression and that endogenous NO production by this enzyme causes a block in mitochondrial respiration, resulting in a state that resembles hypoxia functionally. The commitment to glycolytic metabolism in activated DCs occurs only in DC subsets that make NO, is a direct consequence of the inhibition of OXPHOS by NO, and serves a vital survival function to provide ATP in the absence of mitochondrial ATP generation (Figure 7).

NO is a functionally pleiotropic molecule with roles in muscle contractility, platelet aggregation, neuronal activity, and immune responses.²⁷  Endogenously produced NO has been shown to affect the microbicidal properties,¹¹  activation,²⁸  migration,²⁹  and T cell–priming capacities³⁰  of DCs. However, little is known about the effects of NO on DC metabolism. We have found that autocrine NO interferes with mitochondrial respiration directly in DCs. An autocrine inhibitory effect of NO on OXPHOS has been reported previously in astrocytes¹⁹  and macrophages.³¹  NO is likely to inhibit OXPHOS by reversibly competing with oxygen to inhibit cytochrome c oxidase, the terminal enzyme of the ETC.¹⁷  Our observations that neither ATP synthase inhibition (by oligomycin) nor uncoupling of OXPHOS (by FCCP) induced any changes in oxygen consumption in TLR-activated DCs are consistent with NO acting directly on the ETC.

We found herein that after inhibition of OXPHOS by NO, LPS-activated DCs maintain energy production by up-regulating glycolysis, a phenomenon reminiscent of what has been observed in classically activated macrophages.^32,33  In the absence of ATP production by glycolysis, intracellular ATP levels decreased precipitously within minutes, resulting in rapid cell death. Apart from providing ATP for energy-demanding processes such as translation and movement, glycolytic ATP is thought to be important for maintenance of ΔΨ_m in the absence of functional mitochondrial respiration.³⁴  In this case, glycolytic ATP is consumed by ATP synthase acting in reverse to maintain a proton gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane. This prevents depolarization of the mitochondria and thereby prevents release of cytochrome c and induction of apoptosis.²³ 

The underlying mechanism(s) behind the up-regulation of glycolysis in response to inhibition of mitochondrial respiration remains to be identified. In astrocytes, NO can act through AMP-activated kinase to increase the activity of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase and induce expression of phosphofructo-2-kinase, both important positive regulators of glycolysis that were found to be essential for astrocyte survival in the presence of NO.³⁵  Furthermore, glucose uptake in these cells was enhanced by NO via up-regulation of glucose transporter-3 in an AMP-activated kinase–dependent manner.³⁶  This may be analogous to the increased glucose transporter-1 expression observed in LPS-activated DCs.⁴  In addition, hypoxia-induced factor 1-α (HIF-1α), a key regulator of glycolysis during hypoxia, has been implicated in the up-regulation of genes involved in glycolysis in response to NO in macrophages.³¹  However, the effects of NO on HIF-1α stabilization seem to be different between normoxic and hypoxic conditions.³⁷  An alternative view is that the NO-mediated inhibition of the ETC feeds back to block metabolic turnover in the mitochondrial TCA cycle, which results in an accumulation of pyruvate that is consequently converted into lactate to maintain glycolytic flow for ATP generation (Figure 7).

We showed previously that PI3K signaling downstream of TLR is required for the commitment to glycolytic metabolism.⁴  Together with the known importance of the PI3K signaling pathway in promoting glycolysis,⁸  this led us to propose that PI3K signaling in response to TLR ligation promotes the direct expression of genes supporting glycolytic metabolism. However, it is also known that PI3K signaling is crucial for iNOS expression and function.^38,39  Therefore, the data presented herein suggest the possibility that the reported PI3K-driven long-term commitment to glycolysis after TLR ligation may be a consequence of iNOS expression and concomitant impairment of OXPHOS and not of the direct promotion of glycolysis itself.

We have proposed previously that commitment of DCs to glycolysis in response to TLR ligation is a reflection of the importance of this metabolic pathway for both DC activation and survival.⁴  However, our current findings suggest that the long-term switch to glycolysis in response to TLR ligation is essential for DC survival by providing ATP in the absence of OXPHOS, but is dispensable for DC activation, because no defect in activation was found of DCs in which iNOS was inhibited and in which no increase in long-term glycolysis was observed. In fact, our data (Figure 4E) indicate that NO-driven impairment of mitochondrial function results in reduced DC activation by TLR agonists. Together with the fact that DCs, when deprived of glucose during LPS stimulation, fail to mature,⁴  this leads us to propose that glycolysis may serve 2 purposes in DCs after TLR ligation. First, during the first few hours after TLR stimulation, glycolysis may be essential for providing the metabolic and bioenergetics resources required to enact the activation pathway. Second, once TLR ligation has induced iNOS expression, leading to an NO-mediated loss of mitochondrial respiration, glycolysis may primarily provide ATP for cell survival. Furthermore, the observed increase in OCR during the first 6 hours in response to TLR ligation may hint at a role for mitochondrial metabolism in DC activation as well. We are currently trying to understand in detail how the early changes (within 0-6 hours of exposure to TLR agonists) in glycolytic and mitochondrial metabolism are regulated and how this affects DC activation and function.

An analysis of 3 different subsets of splenic DCs isolated from mice revealed a strong link between the ability to express iNOS and the commitment to sustained glycolysis after activation. Our data suggest that inflammatory moDCs, which do express iNOS, are vulnerable to the same metabolic challenges faced by their in vitro–generated counterparts after activation. Only a small proportion (approximately 6%) of the inflammatory moDCs expressed iNOS without TLR stimulation ex vivo, which was not sufficient to observe a significant effect on metabolism on the cultured cell population as a whole. Only when the DCs were restimulated ex vivo with LPS to induce iNOS expression in a higher percentage of cells was a switch to glycolytic metabolism observed. Whereas these observations do not address whether iNOS-dependent metabolic changes occur in DCs in vivo as well, our findings that glycolysis is specifically required for survival of iNOS-expressing DCs, but not other DC subsets in vivo, support the notion that individual iNOS-expressing DCs in vivo experience an autocrine NO-dependent block in mitochondrial respiration, resulting in a commitment to glycolysis that is essential for their survival. Apart from autocrine effects of NO, its production may affect the metabolism of adjacent cells as well. Given the known paracrine effects of NO derived from iNOS-expressing macrophages,^40,41  it is possible that DC-derived NO affects the function of neighboring cells. For example, there is clear evidence from in vitro antigen-presentation assays that NO made by DCs is able to inhibit the proliferative ability of T cells,^22,30  and it is interesting to speculate that this reflects an effect of NO on T-cell mitochondrial function.

Because inflammatory moDCs are thought to differentiate from monocytes at inflammatory sites, where oxygen levels can be low, their enhanced capacity to generate ATP anaerobically might be advantageous. Interestingly, not all cells are able to switch efficiently to glycolytic metabolism and to survive in response to impaired OXPHOS.⁴²  It is conceivable that inflammatory moDCs are specialized to switch to glycolysis when necessary, precisely because they are able to make NO when activated and have evolved to enter potentially hypoxic environments. Therefore, it makes sense that they differ from resident lymphoid organ DCs, which are specialized to regulate T-cell responses to antigen arriving from distal sites. Regardless, our data imply that the ultimate effect on cellular survival and functionality of inhibition of the ETC by NO will depend on the availability of glucose to run the glycolytic pathway. Whereas the body has evolved to keep blood glucose levels within a narrow concentration range, local glucose concentrations in tissues, where highly activated inflammatory cells are infiltrating and competing for nutrients, are poorly understood. Further studies will be required to address these issues, and will help in the development of a clearer understanding of the functional consequences of iNOS-driven metabolic changes in DCs and other cells.

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant AI53825 to E.J.P.; grants RR000954, DK020579, and DK056341 to E.L.P. and K.E.Y.; and T32 training award AI049823 to E.A.), The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Rubicon grant to G.J.W.W.), and the Trudeau Institute.

National Institutes of Health

Contribution: B.E. and E.A. designed the research, performed the experiments, and interpreted the data; G.J.W.v.d.W., R.C., K.E.Y., and E.L.P. helped with the experimental design and data interpretation; T.C.F. and R.C. performed the experiments; B.E. and E.J.P. wrote the manuscript; and E.J.P. designed and directed the research and interpreted the data.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: E. J. Pearce, Division of Immunobiology, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8118, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110; e-mail: [email protected].