Abstract

Amyloidosis is a rare group of diseases characterized by deposition of amyloid fibrils in soft tissues. More than 28 types of amyloid have been identified. They all share common ultrastructural and chemical characteristics. Treatments are available for many types but are type specific. Therefore, confirmation and typing of amyloid are essential before initiating treatment. Monoclonal protein studies should be performed on suspected cases, but the diagnosis requires a tissue biopsy. Congo red stain and electron microscopy are helpful to discriminate between amyloid and other pathologic fibrils. Once amyloid is confirmed, typing should be performed. Immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry are frequently used and are helpful, but this approach has limitations, such as availability, specificity and sensitivity of commercial antibodies. Genetic mutational analysis is vital for ruling in and out hereditary amyloidoses but is unhelpful in nonmutated forms. The most advanced technique of amyloid typing is laser microdissection followed by mass spectrometry. Using proteomics, laser microdissection followed by mass spectrometry can directly identify proteins with or without mutations. Finally, imaging studies, such as cardiac MRI with gadolinium and 123I-labeled SAP scintigraphy not only assist in evaluation of patients with known amyloidosis but cardiac MRI has detected amyloid in patients previously unsuspected of the disease.

Introduction

Amyloidosis is a heterogeneous group of diseases bound by the characteristic deposition of amyloid fibrils in soft tissues.1  Other pathogenic fibrils exist, but only amyloid fibrils are capable of giving off an apple-green birefringence under polarized light after binding to Congo red. To date, > 28 proteins have been identified to be amyloidogenic.2  One of the most recent additions to the amyloid family is ALECT2 (leukocyte cell derived chemotaxin-2).3  As the number of amyloidogenic proteins increases, it outgrew the capacity of the previous nomenclature, which consisted of, for example, primary, secondary, and hereditary.2  The new system uses an abbreviation of the native protein. For example, immunoglobulin light chain is AL, serum amyloid A protein is AA, transthyretin is ATTR, and so on. Although the native proteins come in various sizes and tertiary structures, all amyloid fibrils have the same characteristic cross-β sheet quaternary structure.1  Under x-ray crystallography, amyloid fibrils produce 2 characteristic diffraction signals at 4.7 and 10 angstroms. Fibrillogenesis begins with misfolding of the precursor protein to a lower thermodynamic state. In this state, the intermediate takes on more β-sheet structures that enable aggregation and self-propagation secured by hydrogen bonds. The resultant product then undergoes a process known as steric zipper where the β-sheet regions from different molecules align themselves and interdigitate to form a dry interface.4  The end product is a protofibril, which is more resistant to degradation. Four to 6 protofibrils are weaved together to form an amyloid fibril.

Mechanisms of fibrillogenesis

Amyloidogenesis can occur via a variety of mechanisms.1,2  Several of the more common ones will be discussed to illustrate the diversity of amyloidogenesis. Genetic mutation often with an amino acid substitution can result in an amyloidogenic protein. They represent the hereditary amyloidoses, which include AFib (fibrinogen A α chain), ALys (lysozyme), AApoAI and AApoAII (apolipoprotein AI and AII), and ATTR. Amyloid can also form from wild-type proteins. The best example is senile amyloid of the wild-type transthyretin. Other senile amyloids include APro (prolactin), ACal (calcitonin), AIAPP (amylin), and AANF (atrial natriuretic factor); all are derived of wild-type proteins. Some amyloids form as a result of sustained elevated concentrations of the wild-type protein. This may occur either by increased production as in the case of AA amyloidosis secondary to chronic infectious, inflammatory conditions or Castleman disease, or decreased elimination as in Aβ2m (β2-microglobulin) that occurs in patients with end-stage renal disease. AIns (insulin) is unique in that the injected insulin forms amyloidomas near injection sites via this process. Other ways of increasing amyloidogenicity is proteolytic remodeling. The best example of this is APP (β-amyloid precursor protein) in Alzheimer disease. Some may involve multiple mechanisms (accumulation, mutation, and proteolytic remodeling), such as AL or AH (immunoglobulin heavy chain).5  One unusual mechanism is seen in the familial periodic fever syndromes that include familial Mediterranean fever, TRAPS (TNF receptor–associated periodic syndrome), Muckle-Wells syndrome, and hyper IgD syndrome.6  In familial periodic fever syndromes, the mutations do not code for an amyloidogenic protein but instead cause periodic fevers that lead to the overproduction of serum amyloid A protein resulting in AA amyloidosis. Amyloid can also be transmitted by prions. Prions are the only infectious agents known to contain no nucleic acids. Prions induce disease by acting as a template for the normal prion protein (PrPc) to misfold into the pathogenic PrPsc, which has amyloid features.7  Finally, in some, the mechanism remains undetermined. The best example of this is ALECT2. No mutations, proteolytic remodeling, or elevated levels have been found so far.8,9 

Clinical presentation

Amyloidosis presents in a variety of ways and can make diagnosis difficult. This is in part because of the many different types of amyloid, but significant variation can exist within an individual type of amyloid. An example is ATTR. The presence of Val30Met mutation strongly predicts for peripheral neuropathy, autonomic neuropathy, and abnormalities in the cerebrospinal fluid, whereas patients with the Val122Ile mutation are more likely to develop cardiac symptoms, especially in blacks.10,11  It is helpful to separate the presentation into 2 patterns: localized and systemic.1  Localized amyloidoses are confined to 1 site and are generally nonlethal. Skin is a common site of deposition and can manifest as asymptomatic plaques, fissures, or nodules. Examples include lichenoid or macular amyloidosis secondary to AD (keratin) deposition in the skin possibly as a result of trauma.2  Amyloidomas composed of AIns are found near the injection sites of diabetics. AL amyloidosis, which is often systemic, also has a localized variant.12,13  Nodular localized cutaneous (AL) amyloidosis is probably a response to a localized inflammatory reaction often produced by polyclonal plasma cells. Patients commonly present with skin plagues (skin), microscopic or gross hematuria (bladder), and unexplained voice changes (larynx), but amyloid can be deposited in other soft tissues. Progression to systemic AL amyloidosis is rare, but local recurrence is not uncommon.14,15 

Systemic amyloidosis implies involvement of visceral organ(s) or multiple tissues. Patients may present with symptoms limited to 1 organ or with multiorgan failure. The most common form of systemic amyloidosis is AL amyloidosis, which outnumbers AA amyloidosis by 20:1 in United States but only 2:1 in Europe because of higher incidence of familial Mediterranean fever.16  Kidney is the most common organ involved in AL, AA, and most forms of hereditary amyloidosis, except ATTR.16–19  Proteinuria is present in 73% of the AL amyloidosis patients, with 30% exhibiting nephrotic syndrome. Renal insufficiency is noted in nearly half of the patients, which is usually associated with proteinuria but can occur without in patients with vascular limited renal amyloidosis.20,21  Renal involvement is nearly universal (97%) in AA amyloidosis.18  Heart is the next most common organ involved in AL amyloidosis with abnormal echocardiographic findings noted in 65% of patients.16  It is the predominate feature in senile TTR amyloidosis.11,19  Presentation varies from asymptomatic to a subtle decrease in exercise capacity to fatigue, dyspnea, and lower extremity edema to angina, syncope, ascites, and anasarca, which are associated with more advanced disease.22  Overt heart failure can be seen in 24%.16  Low voltage on ECG and concentric thickened ventricles on echocardiogram are classic signs of cardiac involvement by amyloidosis. Cardiac involvement, on the other hand, is rare in AA amyloidosis, occurring in only 1% of patients.18  The nervous system is a prominent feature in some forms of amyloidosis and can involve the central nerves, peripheral nerves, or both.16  Peripheral nerve involvement can present with bilateral distal progressive paresthesia or carpel tunnel syndrome. Automatic nervous system involvement is characterized by syncope, erectile dysfunction, gastroparesis, and diarrhea. Some are quite specific as in the case of cystatin c (ACys) amyloidosis, which causes the Icelandic form of hereditary cerebral amyloid angiopathy.2  These patients present with cerebral hemorrhage, stroke, and dementia.2 

Symptoms common to most types of amyloid include fatigue and weight loss, which are reported by more than half of the patients.16  Weight loss, however, is unreliable in patients with nephrotic syndrome because many will gain weight as their edema worsens. Gastrointestinal presentation is not common and usually presents with macroglossia, nausea, vomiting, and pseudo-obstruction, which accounts for < 10% of AL amyloidosis cases. Hepatomegaly is present in 24% of AL amyloidosis patients but in only 9% of AA amyloidosis. Bruising is common and often occurs after minor trauma or procedure, especially around the eyes.

Treatment

It is beyond the scope of this article to discuss treatment of amyloidosis in detail. For more comprehensive review of treatment options for AL amyloidosis, interested readers should refer to previous articles.23,24  It is important to recognize that treatments are available for many types of amyloidosis but they are type specific. For localized amyloid, local treatment such as excision or laser removal may be appropriate once systemic disease is ruled out.12  In AL amyloidosis, which is almost always the result of a plasma cell dyscrasia (rarely lymphoproliferative disorders), antimyeloma therapies have been effective.25–28  The treatment of AA amyloidosis is targeted toward the underlying infection or inflammatory condition.18  For patients with a periodic fever syndrome, biologic agents, such as anti-TNF or IL-1 receptor antagonists, have been effective both for symptom control and improvement of the amyloidosis.6,29,30  Organ transplantation has been used in several different types of hereditary amyloidosis.31,32  This is done either to replace damaged organs or to eliminate the source of the mutant protein. The most common example of the latter is liver transplantation in patients with ATTR amyloidosis where the mutant transthyretin is produced primarily in the liver.33  Liver transplantation has also been performed in combination with kidney transplantation to prevent recurrence in the kidney. This has been done successfully in patients with AFib and AApoAI amyloidosis.31,32,34  Although it appears to be effective at preventing recurrence, additional risk of the liver transplantation should be considered.

Because treatment is specific to each type of amyloid, accurate diagnosis is essential. This is especially true when cytotoxic therapy or organ transplantation is being considered. The presence of a monoclonal protein alone is not enough to support the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis or AH amyloidosis. In a single-center study of 350 patients with suspected AL amyloidosis, 34 (10%) were found to have a genetic mutation coding for one of the familial amyloidoses, most commonly AFib and ATTR.35  Eight (24%) of these 34 patients had a monoclonal gammopathy. The number of misdiagnoses could be even greater because some amyloidoses are not the result of genetic mutations. Interestingly, a recent study found that ALECT2 was the most common undiagnosed type of amyloid.9  So far, ALECT2 does not appear to be the result of genetic mutations, but there may be a predilection for homozygosity in the G allele.8  This also applies to senile amyloidosis, which is the result of accumulation of normal transthyretin with no genetic mutations.2 

Diagnostic approach

Patients presenting with multiorgan derangement should be screened for amyloidosis. The diagnosis is much more challenging when the patient presents with single-organ involvement as it may mimic more common diseases. A high index of suspicion is often required. Screening should be performed in patients with unexplained heart failure, neuropathy, and nephrotic syndrome. Clues that raise suspicion include low voltage on ECG, severe hypotension without antihypertensive medications, and the presence of neuropathy in combination with other organ involvement.16,22,36  Easy bruisability, especially “raccoon eyes” after procedures or minor trauma, is another hint. Major bleeding can result from factor X and vitamin K-dependent clotting factor deficiency but is much less common.

Several elements of the history should alert the provider toward AA amyloidosis. Chronic inflammatory conditions (eg, rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis), chronic infections (eg, bronchiectasis, pressure ulcers, subcutaneous drug use “skin popping,” osteomyelitis, and tuberculosis), inflammatory bowel disease, and rarely vasculitis are known associates of AA amyloidosis.18,37  A history of recurrent fevers, especially in the absence of infection, should prompt an evaluation for hereditary fever syndrome. Although lymphoproliferative disorders are usually associated with AL, 2 in particular are associated with AA. First is Castleman disease, also known as angiofollicular lymph node hyperplasia.38  Extensive involvement of the AA amyloid can occur, even with unicentric Castleman disease. Stabilization of symptoms has been reported after surgical resection. The other is IgM monoclonal gammopathy. This is usually associated with AL amyloidosis, but AA amyloidosis has also been reported.39  Hepato/splenomegaly in patients with Schnitzler syndrome (IgM monoclonal gammopathy, urticarial rash, arthralgia, bone pain, lymphadenopathy) should alert one toward the possibility of AA amyloidosis.40  AA amyloidosis has also been reported in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia without Schnitzler syndrome.41 

Screening tests

Monoclonal protein testing of the serum and urine is readily available and should be performed on all suspected cases. AL amyloidosis is the most common and dangerous form of amyloidosis and definitely should be ruled out.42  In addition to serum and urine protein electrophoresis and immunofixation, serum free light chain test can increase the sensitivity (especially in monoclonal light chain only cases) by 10%-15%.43  Bone marrow biopsy should be performed if a monoclonal protein is identified or if the amyloid is AL or AH type. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate may be elevated in patients with a monoclonal protein and both erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein may be elevated in patients with a history of chronic inflammatory disease or infection. Serum amyloid A (SAA) level can also be directly measured. Although there is a good correlation between C-reactive protein and SAA, studies found that SAA is more sensitive at identifying patients at risk of development of AA and has better prognostic value.18,44  Unfortunately, the test is currently not approved in the United States.18 

Biopsy

Although screening tests are helpful, amyloidosis is a histologic diagnosis and tissue biopsy is required.1  Other paraprotein related diseases can mimic amyloidosis. Nephrotic syndrome with monoclonal gammopathy occurs in monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease, immunotactoid glomerulonephritis, fibrillary glomerulonephritis, type I cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, and others.45,46  Neuropathy and monoclonal gammopathy are seen in POEMS syndrome, IgM-associated neuropathy, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance-associated neuropathies and anti-myelin–associated glycoprotein associated neuropathies.47,48  It is essential that amyloid deposition in tissue is demonstrated for the diagnosis.

In general, the highest sensitivity and specificity are achieved by obtaining tissue from the dysfunctional organ. Using this approach, studies have found heart to be 100% sensitive followed by liver at 97% and kidney at 94%. Although bleeding is a concern, the risk is no higher than patients without amyloidosis if standard screening procedure is followed.49  In situations where biopsy of the organ involved is not practical or unsafe, alternative sites may be biopsied. The easiest is abdominal fat. This can be done either by fine needle aspirate or biopsy. It has a sensitivity of ∼ 80%.16  Rectum is another commonly used site and has a sensitivity of 75%. It is usually performed via a flexible sigmoidoscopy. Bone marrow biopsy may also contain amyloid deposits, but sensitivity is only 56%. Amyloid can also be found in thyroid nodules, but incidence is unknown and there are no data on sensitivity. Given its safety, one should not hesitate to perform a fat aspirate if the index of suspicion is moderate or higher.

Histochemistry

On light microscopy with hematoxylin and eosin stain, amyloid appears as a light pink amorphous extracellular substance.50  It is negative on periodic acid-Schiff and methenamine silver stains, and blue or gray on trichrome stain. The gold standard for diagnosis of amyloid is the Congo red stain. All forms of amyloid exhibit affinity for Congo red and give off an apple-green birefringence under polarized light. It is one of the characteristics that distinguish amyloid from other fibrils. For best visualization of small amyloid deposits, the tissue sections for Congo red stain should be 6-10 μm in thickness (rather than the 2-4 μm thickness used for renal pathology and the 3-5 μm thickness for general pathology). Pay particular attentions to vessel walls where amyloid deposits can often be found in all tissue. The apple-green birefringence of amyloid should not be confused with the yellow-green birefringence of collagen.51  Although the birefringence is very specific to amyloid in animals, it occurs with cellulose. Thus it is important to avoid any cotton or paper fiber contamination on the slides. Thioflavin T, which binds to β-sheet rich structures, is another stain that can be used to diagnose amyloid. It is yellow but undergoes a red shift under fluorescence enhancement. Although it is sensitive, it is less specific than Congo red.

Electron microscopy

Electron microscopy is routinely used in analysis of kidney biopsy in United States and other countries. It is extremely helpful in the diagnosis because amyloid fibrils have unique electron microscopy characteristics. Amyloid fibrils are typically randomly arranged, nonbranching, and solid with a diameter between 7 and 12 nm.1  In comparison, fibrils of fibrillary and immunotactoid glomerulonephritis are larger at 7-26 nm and 9-45 nm, respectively.50  Fibrils of immunotactoid are similar to those of cryoglobulins and tend to be organized at least focally in parallel arrays. They also have a hollowed center resembling microtubules. The fibrils of these diseases typically stain for the entire immunoglobulin but rarely for a single light chain only. Most cases of immunotactoid glomerulonephritis and a minority of cases of fibrillary glomerulonephritis are associated with a monoclonal gammopathy. It is therefore not uncommon for them to be misdiagnosed as AH or ALH (immunoglobulin light and heavy chain) amyloidosis.52  Fibrils can also be found in hereditary nephropathies with fibronectin, and collagenofibrotic glomerulopathy, diabetic nephropathy (so called “diabetic fibrillosis”), lupus nephritis, and thrombotic microangiopathy.

Amyloid typing

Immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry

Once amyloid has been identified, further characterization and typing must be performed. Direct immunofluorescence microscopy, which is routinely performed on native kidney biopsies, is one of the most common and convenient methods of amyloid typing and should be the first step. It is most useful in cases of amyloid composed of immunoglobulin components where antibodies are widely available. AL and/or AH amyloid can be typed by immunofluorescence using FITC-labeled antibodies to IgA, IgM, IgG, κ, and λ light chain. For AL amyloidosis, only one of the immunoglobulin light chains should stain positive in the amyloid deposits. For AH amyloidosis, the deposits will stain positive for a single subclass of immunoglobulin heavy chain without light chain, whereas a single light chain will also stain in ALH. Standard immunofluorescence is performed on fresh frozen tissue. In the absence of frozen tissue, immunofluorescence can be performed with pronase-digested paraffin-embedded tissue. Determining the immunoglobulin component involved in amyloidogenesis identifies the target of therapy. Recent studies found that reduction of the involved free light chain is more important than the intact immunoglobulin for patients with AL amyloidosis.53  An alternative method is immunohistochemistry using immunoperoxidase staining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. This works well for AL, AH, AA, AFib, ATTR, AApoA1, and AB2m where antibodies are available commercially. Immunohistochemistry can also aid in the diagnosis of amyloidosis. Antibodies against serum amyloid P (SAP), which codeposits with amyloid, can be used to distinguish light chain deposits of AL amyloidosis from monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease. Immunofluorescence is superior to immunohistochemistry for the accurate typing of AL or AH amyloidosis because of the lower background staining in the former. Because frozen tissue is not usually available in nonrenal samples, immunohistochemistry, not immunofluorescence, is typically performed on these samples.

Despite the convenience and availability, there are some drawbacks to immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry. One limitation is the availability of antibodies. Although antibodies are generally available for the most common forms of amyloid, availability is variable for the less common forms. Sensitivity and specificity of the antibodies are another problem. Because amyloid precursors often have genetic mutations and conformational changes, antibodies produced against the wild-type protein may be less reactive with the mutant form. This seems particularly problematic for AL, which has the greatest variability.5  In renal amyloidosis, the amyloid deposits can be negative for both κ and λ in 14% of cases using immunofluorescence.54  The same is true for immunohistochemistry. One study found 24 of the 76 samples suspected of AL could not be definitely diagnosed with immunohistochemistry.55  Thus, negative or equivocal staining for immunoglobulin light and/or heavy chains does not automatically rule out AL.55,56  Additional testing with a panel of antibodies directed toward other amyloidogenic proteins was required to make the diagnosis. Even with that, 5 patients could not be typed.55  On the other hand, better results were obtainable by the use of multiple antibodies. In a separate study with biopsies from patients with AL, AA, ATTR, AFib, and AApoA1, the sensitivity was increased to 92%-96% with a 100% specificity when multiple antibodies against κ and λ were used.57  In cases where the staining of light chains is negative or equivocal, the use of antibodies from different vendors and a panel of antibodies against other amyloids may be helpful. The biggest problem with these techniques, however, is the requirement to perform a separate test for each type of amyloid being considered. This becomes cumbersome once the common forms of amyloid have been ruled out and is impractical for the discovery of new type of amyloid. Finally, charge interaction of the amyloid and the reagent antibody or contamination of the amyloid deposits by serum proteins can all lead to nonspecific staining for immunoglobulins in immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence. This nonspecific staining occurs more frequently in AA than AL amyloidosis.54–56 

Immunogold electron microscopy is a technique that combines immunohistochemistry with electron microscopy. Using gold-labeled antibodies, precise localization of the amyloid in the tissue can be accomplished. This technique also ensures that the antibodies are reacting with the amyloid and not other proteins in the surrounding tissue. Although it can be used for diagnostics, it is mainly used for research.58  In addition to localization of amyloid deposits, it is particularly useful for the identification of chaperone proteins.59–61  One study suggests that it may also be used for quantification of amyloid deposits.59–61  However, because it is an antibody-based method, it has all of the same limitations of immunohistochemistry.

Genetic testing

Given the number of amyloid that is the result of genetic mutations, genetic testing is an important part of the typing process. Mutations have been identified in all of the hereditary amyloidosis, such as ATTR amyloidosis, AApoAI amyloidosis, AApoAII, ALys amyloidosis, AFib amyloidosis, and AGel (gelsolin) amyloidosis. It is particularly important in ATTR where a senile form exists. Genetic testing is also available for periodic fever syndromes. These tests are commercially available and are relatively easy to obtain. However, it is important to understand the limitations. First is the issue of genotype versus phenotype. Variability in penetrance may result in lack of disease despite the presence of the mutation.1  Second, the method of genetic testing plays a large role in the sensitivity and specificity. Most commercial laboratories use restriction fragment length polymorphism, which can only detect known mutations. Complete gene sequencing may be necessary to detect novel mutations. Fortunately, the cost and time involved with DNA microarray, SNP array analysis, and other modern gene sequencing techniques have both decreased substantially, making complete gene analysis much more feasible. Finally, amyloid, such as ALECT2 and senile systemic amyloid, do not have identifiable mutations and would not be identified by genetic testing.

Proteomics

Unlike previous methods, proteomics is interested in the proteome, which is composed of the entire complement of the proteins in an organism or environment. As a result, it eliminates the need to perform individual tests for each protein of interest. Limitations resulting from unavailable antibodies or undiscovered mutations have no effect on proteomics. Any protein that has been previously identified can be tested by this one test. Previously, proteomics was performed by N-terminal Edman degradation, which involved sequencing the proteins present.62  Aside from being extremely time-consuming, there was also a limit on the number of proteins that can be tested at any one time. Proteomics currently is performed with mass spectrometry, which has the capability for high-throughput and identification of the entire proteome. Because mass spectrometry is concentration dependent, the proteins must to be separated before analysis. This can be accomplished by several techniques, including gel electrophoresis (1- or 2-dimensional), but the most efficient is liquid chromatography. Most modern proteomics combines a reverse phase liquid chromatography with tandem electrospray mass spectrometer for maximum efficiency.

The gold standard in the applications of proteomics for amyloid typing today is laser microdissection followed by mass spectrometry (LMD-MS).62  Congo red-positive areas are dissected under a laser dissecting microscopy followed by tryptic digestion of the dissected material (Figure 1). The digested peptides are analyzed by liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. The signature is queried by 3 different algorithms and is assigned a probability score. In a study using 50 biopsy samples of different tissues containing multiple types of amyloid typed by other techniques, LMD-MS was able to correctly identified 50 of 50 samples.63  In a validation test, LMD-MS identified 40 of 41 amyloid samples, whereas immunohistochemistry only identified 15 of 36 samples. Because LMD-MS directly analyzes the actual peptide, it can identify protein with or without known mutations. LMD-MS can also aid in the diagnostic process. In the kidney, the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis (λ) requires large spectra of Ig λ-light chain C-region with or without λ-light chain V region and the absence of any significant κ light chains. This is because immunoglobulins and immunoglobulin light chains can deposit in the kidney in other pathologic states without being amyloid. The process is more straightforward for non-AL/AH amyloids because these peptides (eg, SAA, LECT2, and ApoAI) are not found in the normal proteome of the glomerulus. For AFib, the mutated fibrinogen A α-chain peptide would be present. Both senile amyloid and ATTR would show spectra for transthyretin, but only ATTR would show the mutant protein. Representative mass spectrometry results from a case of AL κ-light chain amyloidosis and LECT2 amyloidosis are shown in Figure 2. In addition to typing, LMD-MS can also aid in the diagnosis. The diagnosis of amyloidosis at the proteomic level using LMD-MS is based on the presence of large spectra of SAP. In all cases, large spectra of apolipoprotein E are also present. The typing of amyloid is then based on the presence of spectra that correspond to the specific type of amyloid. However, Congo red or electron microscopy confirmation is advised as both fibrillary and immunotactoid glomerulonephritis can have similar spectra.

Figure 1

Laser microdissection. Congo red positive (A) glomeruli and vessels marked for microdissection from case 1 (AL with kappa light chain) and (B) glomeruli marked for microdissection from case 2 (ALECT2).

Figure 1

Laser microdissection. Congo red positive (A) glomeruli and vessels marked for microdissection from case 1 (AL with kappa light chain) and (B) glomeruli marked for microdissection from case 2 (ALECT2).

Figure 2

Representative mass spectrometry data. (A) AL κ light chain amyloidosis showing the top 15 spectra. Mass spectrometry shows large spectra for serum amyloid P-component, apolipoprotein E, and immunoglobulin κ V-I region and κ-constant region. (B) LECT-2 amyloidosis showing large spectra for serum amyloid P-component, apolipoprotein E, and leukocyte cell derived chemotaxin-2. The probability number (> 95% is highlighted by green, 80%-94% by yellow) indicates essentially the percent homology between peptides detected in the specimens and the published amino acid sequences of their corresponding proteins.

Figure 2

Representative mass spectrometry data. (A) AL κ light chain amyloidosis showing the top 15 spectra. Mass spectrometry shows large spectra for serum amyloid P-component, apolipoprotein E, and immunoglobulin κ V-I region and κ-constant region. (B) LECT-2 amyloidosis showing large spectra for serum amyloid P-component, apolipoprotein E, and leukocyte cell derived chemotaxin-2. The probability number (> 95% is highlighted by green, 80%-94% by yellow) indicates essentially the percent homology between peptides detected in the specimens and the published amino acid sequences of their corresponding proteins.

The advantage of LMD-MS over conventional methods of amyloid typing is that LMD-MS is a single test that can identify the amyloid protein in question versus others, which test the biopsy material for amyloid proteins individually. LMD-MS can be performed on all tissue, including fat aspirate as long as amyloid deposits are present. In addition, LMD-MS is performed on paraffin-embedded material and does not require frozen material. Thus, studies can be performed on archival material. Others have described the use of tryptic digest of unfixed whole fat for LMD-MS with equally impressive results, which potentially further simplifies the methodology of amyloid typing.64  Finally, with the current software and database, it is possible to identify the genetic variants of amyloidogenic proteins, such as variants of SAA or mutated fibrinogen-α protein.

Imaging modalities

Finally, there are 2 imaging modalities that deserve recognition for their ability to detect amyloid in the body. Although they are generally not used for diagnostic purpose, they are quite useful in detecting amyloid in the body once the diagnosis is made. The first is MRI. It is most useful for cardiac amyloid, and cases of amyloidosis have been identified in unsuspected patients undergoing the test for cardiomyopathy. Global delayed postgadolinium enhancement of the subendocardial myocardium is characteristic of amyloid infiltration and can be used to distinguish amyloid from other types of cardiomyopathies.22  Together with concentric ventricular hypertrophy and blood-pool gadolinium kinetics, the accuracy cardiac MRI can be as high as 97%. Unfortunately, these findings are associated with advanced disease, and sensitivity may be lower in early amyloid cases.22  Demonstration of abnormal stain rate by pulsed tissue Doppler imaging on echocardiography is more sensitive for early amyloid involvement, but it is not specific.65,66  In addition, although advanced findings are prognostic, milder cardiac involvement is more difficult to correlate with patient outcomes. Cardiac biomarkers have been extremely helpful in prognostication of these patients.67  The other technique is 123I-labeled SAP (123I-SAP) scintigraphy. This technique uses radiolabeled serum amyloid P component to locate amyloid deposits in the body.68,69  Because SAP binds to all amyloid, it can be used in every type. Deposits can be quantified from the scintigrams, and the results can be used to monitor amyloid regression after treatment or recurrence after organ transplantation.70,71  One area where SAP scintigraphy does not image well is the heart. Other techniques are required for assessment if heart involvement is suspected. Cardiac MRI and echocardiography can often be used. Recently, 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy was thought to be superior to 123I-SAP scintigraphy, but this may be limited to the ATTR patients.72 123I-SAP scintigraphy is currently available in Europe but has not been approved in the United States.

Although amyloidosis remains a serious disease with fatal consequences, treatment is now available for many types.26,31,73  Because treatments are type specific and quite intensive or invasive, it is essential that the diagnosis is confirmed before treatment is initiated. Confirmation of amyloid is the first step because other pathologic fibrils exist. Once amyloid is confirmed, typing must be performed so the proper treatment can be prescribed. An algorithm for diagnosis and typing of amyloidosis is shown in Figure 3. Circumstantial evidence, such as circulating monoclonal protein or monoclonal plasma cells, cannot be used for typing. Direct testing of the amyloid protein is ideal. Immunotyping by direct immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry is widely available and should be the first step in typing. But antibodies are not available for all types of amyloid, sensitivity, and specificity can also be an issue. The current gold standard is proteomics via LMD-MS. It accurately identifies known amyloid protein and has the capability of characterizing novel ones.74  If unavailable, genetic testing can be performed to look for known hereditary amyloidoses in cases where immunotyping is equivocal or negative. For patients with AA, it is important to rule out familial periodic fever syndromes, even in patients without characteristic symptoms as cases of TRAPS have been reported in patients without fever.75  Cardiac MRI can be used to determine cardiac involvement without the need for a cardiac biopsy if amyloid has been detected elsewhere in the body. Regression and progression can be monitored with 123I-SAP scintigraphy. Hopefully, future advances will make the diagnosis and typing of amyloid easier and more accurate which will insure better treatment for these patients.

Figure 3

Algorithm for diagnosis and typing of renal amyloidosis used at the Mayo Clinic. Diagnosis and typing in renal amyloidosis.

Figure 3

Algorithm for diagnosis and typing of renal amyloidosis used at the Mayo Clinic. Diagnosis and typing in renal amyloidosis.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jason Theis (Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology) for help with the figures.

Authorship

Contribution: N.L., S.H.N., and S.S. designed and wrote the manuscript.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Nelson Leung, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; e-mail: leung.nelson@mayo.edu.

References

References
1
Merlini
G
Bellotti
V
Molecular mechanisms of amyloidosis [see comment].
N Engl J Med
2003
, vol. 
349
 
6
(pg. 
583
-
596
)
2
Xing
Y
Higuchi
K
Amyloid fibril proteins.
Mech Ageing Dev
2002
, vol. 
123
 
12
(pg. 
1625
-
1636
)
3
Benson
MD
LECT2 amyloidosis.
Kidney Int
2010
, vol. 
77
 
9
(pg. 
757
-
759
)
4
Sawaya
MR
Sambashivan
S
Nelson
R
, et al. 
Atomic structures of amyloid cross-beta spines reveal varied steric zippers.
Nature
2007
, vol. 
447
 
7143
(pg. 
453
-
457
)
5
Poshusta
TL
Sikkink
LA
Leung
N
Clark
RJ
Dispenzieri
A
Ramirez-Alvarado
M
Mutations in specific structural regions of immunoglobulin light chains are associated with free light chain levels in patients with AL amyloidosis.
PLoS One
2009
, vol. 
4
 
4
pg. 
e5169
 
6
van der Hilst
JC
Simon
A
Drenth
JP
Hereditary periodic fever and reactive amyloidosis.
Clin Exp Med
2005
, vol. 
5
 
3
(pg. 
87
-
98
)
7
Aguzzi
A
Unraveling prion strains with cell biology and organic chemistry.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2008
, vol. 
105
 
1
(pg. 
11
-
12
)
8
Murphy
CL
Wang
S
Kestler
D
, et al. 
Leukocyte chemotactic factor 2 (LECT2)-associated renal amyloidosis: a case series.
Am J Kidney Dis
2010
, vol. 
56
 
6
(pg. 
1100
-
1107
)
9
Larsen
CP
Walker
PD
Weiss
DT
Solomon
A
Prevalence and morphology of leukocyte chemotactic factor 2-associated amyloid in renal biopsies.
Kidney Int
2010
, vol. 
77
 
9
(pg. 
816
-
819
)
10
Koike
H
Hashimoto
R
Tomita
M
, et al. 
Diagnosis of sporadic transthyretin Val30Met familial amyloid polyneuropathy: a practical analysis.
Amyloid
2011
, vol. 
18
 
2
(pg. 
53
-
62
)
11
Buxbaum
J
Alexander
A
Koziol
J
Tagoe
C
Fox
E
Kitzman
D
Significance of the amyloidogenic transthyretin Val 122 Ile allele in African Americans in the Arteriosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) and Cardiovascular Health (CHS) Studies.
Am Heart J
2010
, vol. 
159
 
5
(pg. 
864
-
870
)
12
Penner
CR
Muller
S
Head and neck amyloidosis: a clinicopathologic study of 15 cases.
Oral Oncol
2006
, vol. 
42
 
4
(pg. 
421
-
429
)
13
Paccalin
M
Hachulla
E
Cazalet
C
, et al. 
Localized amyloidosis: a survey of 35 French cases.
Amyloid
2005
, vol. 
12
 
4
(pg. 
239
-
245
)
14
Lewis
JE
Olsen
KD
Kurtin
PJ
Kyle
RA
Laryngeal amyloidosis: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical review.
Otolaryngology
1992
, vol. 
106
 
4
(pg. 
372
-
377
)
15
Bartels
H
Dikkers
FG
van der Wal
JE
Lokhorst
HM
Hazenberg
BP
Laryngeal amyloidosis: localized versus systemic disease and update on diagnosis and therapy.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
2004
, vol. 
113
 
9
(pg. 
741
-
748
)
16
Kyle
RA
Gertz
MA
Primary systemic amyloidosis: clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases.
Semin Hematol
1995
, vol. 
32
 
1
(pg. 
45
-
59
)
17
Gillmore
JD
Lachmann
HJ
Rowczenio
D
, et al. 
Diagnosis, pathogenesis, treatment, and prognosis of hereditary fibrinogen A alpha-chain amyloidosis.
J Am Soc Nephrol
2009
, vol. 
20
 
2
(pg. 
444
-
451
)
18
Lachmann
HJ
Goodman
HJ
Gilbertson
JA
, et al. 
Natural history and outcome in systemic AA amyloidosis.
N Engl J Med
2007
, vol. 
356
 
23
(pg. 
2361
-
2371
)
19
Connors
LH
Doros
G
Sam
F
Badiee
A
Seldin
DC
Skinner
M
Clinical features and survival in senile systemic amyloidosis: comparison to familial transthyretin cardiomyopathy.
Amyloid
2011
, vol. 
18
 
Suppl 1
(pg. 
152
-
154
)
20
Eirin
A
Irazabal
MV
Gertz
MA
, et al. 
Clinical features of patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) with vascular-limited deposition in the kidney.
Nephrol Dial Transplant
2012
, vol. 
27
 
3
(pg. 
1097
-
1101
)
21
Gertz
MA
Leung
N
Lacy
MQ
, et al. 
Clinical outcome of immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis affecting the kidney.
Nephrol Dial Transplant
2009
, vol. 
24
 
10
(pg. 
3132
-
3137
)
22
Kapoor
P
Thenappan
T
Singh
E
Kumar
S
Greipp
PR
Cardiac amyloidosis: a practical approach to diagnosis and management.
Am J Med
2011
, vol. 
124
 
11
(pg. 
1006
-
1015
)
23
Gertz
MA
I don't know how to treat amyloidosis.
Blood
2010
, vol. 
116
 
4
(pg. 
507
-
508
)
24
Comenzo
RL
How I treat amyloidosis.
Blood
2009
, vol. 
114
 
15
(pg. 
3147
-
3157
)
25
Palladini
G
Russo
P
Nuvolone
M
, et al. 
Treatment with oral melphalan plus dexamethasone produces long-term remissions in AL amyloidosis.
Blood
2007
, vol. 
110
 
2
(pg. 
787
-
788
)
26
Jaccard
A
Moreau
P
Leblond
V
, et al. 
High-dose melphalan versus melphalan plus dexamethasone for AL amyloidosis.
N Engl J Med
2007
, vol. 
357
 
11
(pg. 
1083
-
1093
)
27
Gertz
MA
Lacy
MQ
Dispenzieri
A
, et al. 
Autologous stem cell transplant for immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: a status report.
Leuk Lymphoma
2010
, vol. 
51
 
12
(pg. 
2181
-
2187
)
28
Comenzo
RL
Gertz
MA
Autologous stem cell transplantation for primary systemic amyloidosis.
Blood
2002
, vol. 
99
 
12
(pg. 
4276
-
4282
)
29
van der Hilst
JC
Kluve-Beckerman
B
Bodar
EJ
van der Meer
JW
Drenth
JP
Simon
A
Lovastatin inhibits formation of AA amyloid.
J Leukoc Biol
2008
, vol. 
83
 
5
(pg. 
1295
-
1299
)
30
Simon
A
van der Meer
JW
Pathogenesis of familial periodic fever syndromes or hereditary autoinflammatory syndromes.
Am J Physiol
2007
, vol. 
292
 
1
(pg. 
R86
-
R98
)
31
Gillmore
JD
Stangou
AJ
Lachmann
HJ
, et al. 
Organ transplantation in hereditary apolipoprotein AI amyloidosis.
Am J Transplant
2006
, vol. 
6
 
10
(pg. 
2342
-
2347
)
32
Gillmore
JD
Lachmann
HJ
Wechalekar
A
Hawkins
PN
Hereditary fibrinogen A alpha-chain amyloidosis: clinical phenotype and role of liver transplantation.
Blood
2010
, vol. 
115
 
21
pg. 
4313
  
author reply, 4314-4315
33
Yamashita
T
Ando
Y
Okamoto
S
, et al. 
Long-term survival after liver transplantation in patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy.
Neurology
2012
, vol. 
78
 
9
(pg. 
637
-
643
)
34
Loss
M
Ng
WS
Karim
RZ
, et al. 
Hereditary lysozyme amyloidosis: spontaneous hepatic rupture (15 years apart) in mother and daughter. Role of emergency liver transplantation.
Liver Transpl
2006
, vol. 
12
 
7
(pg. 
1152
-
1155
)
35
Lachmann
HJ
Booth
DR
Booth
SE
, et al. 
Misdiagnosis of hereditary amyloidosis as AL (primary) amyloidosis.
N Engl J Med
2002
, vol. 
346
 
23
(pg. 
1786
-
1791
)
36
Benson
MD
Ostertag revisited: the inherited systemic amyloidoses without neuropathy.
Amyloid
2005
, vol. 
12
 
2
(pg. 
75
-
87
)
37
Neugarten
J
Gallo
GR
Buxbaum
J
Katz
LA
Rubenstein
J
Baldwin
DS
Amyloidosis in subcutaneous heroin abusers (“skin poppers' amyloidosis”).
Am J Med
1986
, vol. 
81
 
4
(pg. 
635
-
640
)
38
El Karoui
K
Vuiblet
V
Dion
D
, et al. 
Renal involvement in Castleman disease.
Nephrol Dial Transplant
2011
, vol. 
26
 
2
(pg. 
599
-
609
)
39
Gertz
MA
Kyle
RA
Amyloidosis with IgM monoclonal gammopathies.
Semin Oncol
2003
, vol. 
30
 
2
(pg. 
325
-
328
)
40
Lipsker
D
The Schnitzler syndrome.
Orphanet J Rare Dis
2010
, vol. 
5
 pg. 
38
 
41
Gardyn
J
Schwartz
A
Gal
R
Lewinski
U
Kristt
D
Cohen
AM
Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia associated with AA amyloidosis.
Int J Hematol
2001
, vol. 
74
 
1
(pg. 
76
-
78
)
42
Kyle
RA
Rajkumar
SV
Epidemiology of the plasma-cell disorders.
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol
2007
, vol. 
20
 
4
(pg. 
637
-
664
)
43
Katzmann
JA
Kyle
RA
Benson
J
, et al. 
Screening panels for detection of monoclonal gammopathies.
Clin Chem
2009
, vol. 
55
 
8
(pg. 
1517
-
1522
)
44
Gertz
MA
Skinner
M
Sipe
JD
Cohen
AS
Kyle
RA
Serum amyloid A protein and C-reactive protein in systemic amyloidosis.
Clin Exp Rheumatol
1985
, vol. 
3
 
4
(pg. 
317
-
320
)
45
Sethi
S
Zand
L
Leung
N
, et al. 
Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis secondary to monoclonal gammopathy.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol
2010
, vol. 
5
 
5
(pg. 
770
-
782
)
46
Leung
N
Rajkumar
SV
Renal manifestations of plasma cell disorders.
Am J Kidney Dis
2007
, vol. 
50
 
1
(pg. 
155
-
165
)
47
Fisher
MA
Wilson
JR
Characterizing neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS): a framework consistent with classifying injuries according to fiber size.
Neurol Clin Neurophysiol
2002
, vol. 
2002
 
3
(pg. 
2
-
7
)
48
Dispenzieri
A
Kyle
RA
Neurological aspects of multiple myeloma and related disorders.
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol
2005
, vol. 
18
 
4
(pg. 
673
-
688
)
49
Soares
SM
Fervenza
FC
Lager
DJ
Gertz
MA
Cosio
FG
Leung
N
Bleeding complications after transcutaneous kidney biopsy in patients with systemic amyloidosis: single-center experience in 101 patients.
Am J Kidney Dis
2008
, vol. 
52
 
6
(pg. 
1079
-
1083
)
50
Markowitz
GS
Dysproteinemia and the kidney.
Adv Anat Pathol
2004
, vol. 
11
 
1
(pg. 
49
-
63
)
51
Steensma
DP
“Congo” red: out of Africa?
Arch Pathol Lab Med
2001
, vol. 
125
 
2
(pg. 
250
-
252
)
52
Sethi
S
Theis
JD
Leung
N
, et al. 
Mass spectrometry-based proteomic diagnosis of renal immunoglobulin heavy chain amyloidosis.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol
2010
, vol. 
5
 
12
(pg. 
2180
-
2187
)
53
Kumar
SK
Dispenzieri
A
Lacy
MQ
, et al. 
Changes in serum-free light chain rather than intact monoclonal immunoglobulin levels predicts outcome following therapy in primary amyloidosis.
Am J Hematol
2011
, vol. 
86
 
3
(pg. 
251
-
255
)
54
Picken
MM
Immunoglobulin light and heavy chain amyloidosis AL/AH: renal pathology and differential diagnosis.
Contrib Nephrol
2007
, vol. 
153
 (pg. 
135
-
155
)
55
Kebbel
A
Rocken
C
Immunohistochemical classification of amyloid in surgical pathology revisited.
Am J Surg Pathol
2006
, vol. 
30
 
6
(pg. 
673
-
683
)
56
Satoskar
AA
Burdge
K
Cowden
DJ
Nadasdy
GM
Hebert
LA
Nadasdy
T
Typing of amyloidosis in renal biopsies: diagnostic pitfalls.
Arch Pathol Lab Med
2007
, vol. 
131
 
6
(pg. 
917
-
922
)
57
Schönland
SO
Hegenbart
U
Bochtler
T
, et al. 
Immunohistochemistry in the classification of systemic forms of amyloidosis: a systematic investigation of 117 patients.
Blood
2012
, vol. 
119
 
2
(pg. 
488
-
493
)
58
Herrera
GA
Paul
R
Turbat-Herrera
EA
, et al. 
Ultrastructural immunolabeling in the diagnosis of light-chain-related renal disease.
Pathol Immunopathol Res
1986
, vol. 
5
 
2
(pg. 
170
-
187
)
59
Torp
R
Head
E
Milgram
NW
Hahn
F
Ottersen
OP
Cotman
CW
Ultrastructural evidence of fibrillar beta-amyloid associated with neuronal membranes in behaviorally characterized aged dog brains.
Neuroscience
2000
, vol. 
96
 
3
(pg. 
495
-
506
)
60
Ikeda
S
Wong
CW
Allsop
D
Landon
M
Kidd
M
Glenner
GG
Immunogold labeling of cerebrovascular and neuritic plaque amyloid fibrils in Alzheimer's disease with an anti-beta protein monoclonal antibody.
Lab Invest
1987
, vol. 
57
 
4
(pg. 
446
-
449
)
61
Furumoto
H
Shimizu
T
Asagami
C
, et al. 
Apolipoprotein E is present in primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis.
J Invest Dermatol
1998
, vol. 
111
 
3
(pg. 
417
-
421
)
62
Loo
D
Mollee
PN
Renaut
P
Hill
MM
Proteomics in molecular diagnosis: typing of amyloidosis.
J Biomed Biotech
2011
, vol. 
2011
 pg. 
754109
 
63
Vrana
JA
Gamez
JD
Madden
BJ
Theis
JD
Bergen
HR
3rd
Dogan
A
Classification of amyloidosis by laser microdissection and mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis in clinical biopsy specimens.
Blood
2009
, vol. 
114
 
24
(pg. 
4957
-
4959
)
64
Brambilla
F
Lavatelli
F
Di Silvestre
D
, et al. 
Reliable typing of systemic amyloidoses through proteomic analysis of subcutaneous adipose tissue.
Blood
2012
, vol. 
119
 
8
(pg. 
1844
-
1847
)
65
Tsang
W
Lang
RM
Echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac amyloid.
Curr Cardiol Rep
2010
, vol. 
12
 
3
(pg. 
272
-
276
)
66
Meier-Ewert
HK
Sanchorawala
V
Berk
JL
Ruberg
FL
Cardiac amyloidosis: evolving approach to diagnosis and management.
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med
2011
, vol. 
13
 
6
(pg. 
528
-
542
)
67
Palladini
G
Foli
A
Milani
P
, et al. 
Best use of cardiac biomarkers in patients with AL amyloidosis and renal failure.
Am J Hematol
2012
, vol. 
87
 
5
(pg. 
465
-
471
)
68
Hawkins
PN
Myers
MJ
Lavender
JP
Pepys
MB
Diagnostic radionuclide imaging of amyloid: biological targeting by circulating human serum amyloid P component.
Lancet
1988
, vol. 
1
 
8600
(pg. 
1413
-
1418
)
69
Hawkins
PN
Lavender
JP
Pepys
MB
Evaluation of systemic amyloidosis by scintigraphy with 123I-labeled serum amyloid P component.
N Engl J Med
1990
, vol. 
323
 
8
(pg. 
508
-
513
)
70
Hawkins
PN
Serum amyloid P component scintigraphy for diagnosis and monitoring amyloidosis.
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens
2002
, vol. 
11
 
6
(pg. 
649
-
655
)
71
Gillmore
JD
Madhoo
S
Pepys
MB
Hawkins
PN
Renal transplantation for amyloid end-stage renal failure-insights from serial serum amyloid P component scintigraphy.
Nucl Med Commun
2000
, vol. 
21
 
8
(pg. 
735
-
740
)
72
Rapezzi
C
Quarta
CC
Guidalotti
PL
, et al. 
Usefulness and limitations of 99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid scintigraphy in the aetiological diagnosis of amyloidotic cardiomyopathy.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
2011
, vol. 
38
 
3
(pg. 
470
-
478
)
73
Comenzo
RL
Managing systemic light-chain amyloidosis.
J Natl Compr Cancer Netw
2007
, vol. 
5
 
2
(pg. 
179
-
187
)
74
Zwaveling
JH
Hoekstra
HJ
Maring
JK
, et al. 
Renal function in cancer patients treated with hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with recombinant tumor necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan.
Nephron
1997
, vol. 
76
 
2
(pg. 
146
-
152
)
75
Kallinich
T
Haffner
D
Rudolph
B
, et al. 
“Periodic fever” without fever: two cases of non-febrile TRAPS with mutations in the TNFRSF1A gene presenting with episodes of inflammation or monosymptomatic amyloidosis.
Ann Rheum Dis
2006
, vol. 
65
 
7
(pg. 
958
-
960
)