Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs) play powerful regulatory roles in innate and adaptive immune responses and are a major source of type I interferon (IFN) following viral infection. During inflammation and mechanical stress, cells release nucleotides into the extracellular space where they act as signaling molecules via G protein–coupled P2Y receptors. We have previously reported on the regulation of myeloid dendritic cell (DC) function by nucleotides. Here, we report that human PDCs express several subtypes of P2Y receptors and mobilize intracellular calcium in response to nucleotide exposure. As a functional consequence, PDCs acquire a mature phenotype that is further enhanced in the context of CD40 ligation. Strikingly, nucleotides strongly inhibit IFN-α secretion induced by influenza virus or CpG-A. This effect is most pronounced for the uridine nucleotides UDP and UTP and the sugar nucleotide UDP-glucose, ligands of P2Y6, P2Y4, and P2Y14, respectively. Nucleotide-induced inhibition of IFN-α production is blocked by suramin, a P2Y receptor antagonist. Pharmacological data point toward a role of protein kinase C in the negative regulation of type I IFN. Manipulating PDC function with P2Y receptor agonists may offer novel therapeutic strategies for autoimmune diseases or cancer.
Dendritic cells (DCs) are highly specialized antigen-presenting cells and play key roles in the regulation of immune responses. Two populations of DCs are found in human peripheral blood. Myeloid DCs that express CD11c are highly phagocytic, produce a variety of chemokines and cytokines including IL-12, and are uniquely capable of presenting exogenous antigen on MHC-I molecules to CD8+ T cells. In contrast, plasmacytoid DCs (PDCs) express the IL-3 receptor (CD123), have a low phagocytic capacity, and secrete high amounts of type I IFN (IFN-α, β, ω, δ) in response to various viruses.1 PDCs owe their ability to detect and respond to microbes to a specific repertoire of Toll-like receptors (TLRs). In particular, PDCs express high levels of TLR7 and TLR9, which are located in the endosomes and recognize certain nucleotide motifs in viral RNA and DNA, respectively.2 PDCs thus play an important role in viral immunity and in linking innate and adaptive immune responses
Activation of DCs generally occurs in a situation of “danger” and can be induced either by exogenous danger signals derived from pathogens, or by endogenous danger signals, released by tissues undergoing stress, damage, or abnormal death.3 Nucleotides, such as ATP, fit well the role of endogenous danger signals. They are ubiquitously present at high concentrations inside cells and are released into the extracellular space only upon cell activation, stress, or damage. This can be by lytic as well as nonlytic mechanisms caused by host- or pathogen-derived factors. At cell surfaces, nucleotides activate membrane-bound P2 receptors, which are widely distributed in tissues and mediate diverse biologic effects.4 Currently, 15 members of the P2 receptor family have been cloned and are classified as either G protein–coupled P2Y receptors or ligand-gated ion channels termed P2X.
We and others have previously reported that human myeloid DCs express P2 receptors of both subfamilies and that nucleotides regulate key cell functions, such as antigen uptake, maturation marker expression, migration to draining lymph nodes, cytokine production, and T-cell stimulation.5-9 In this paper, we report that human PDCs express a unique repertoire of P2Y receptors that regulate critical aspects of PDC function.
Media and reagents
Human PDCs were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany), supplemented with 2% human AB serum (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD), 2 mM l-glutamine (PAA, Linz, Austria), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin (PAA), and 10 ng/mL IL-3. Adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP), adenosine 5′-diphosphate (ADP), uridine 5′-triphosphate (UTP), uridine 5′-diphosphate (UDP), inosine 5′-diphosphate (IDP), uridine 5′-diphosphoglucose (UDP-glucose), adenosine, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), and suramin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO). The P2Y11 receptor agonist AR-C67085 was a generous gift from AstraZeneca UK (London, United Kingdom). CpG ODN 2216 and ODN 2006 were provided by Coley Pharmaceutical Group (Wellesley, MA) and used at 6 μg/mL. R-848 was from InvivoGen (San Diego, CA). Soluble CD40L-trimer (CD40L) was a gift from Amgen (Seattle, WA) and was used at 1 μg/mL. Influenza virus PR8 (Puerto Rico/8/34, H1N1) was propagated in 10-day-old embryonated chicken eggs and used at 25 HAU.
Monoclonal antibodies, cytokines, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Fluorochrome-conjugated mAbs against CD39, CD62L, CD83, CD86, CD123, CD197 (CCR7), and HLA-DR were purchased from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA); mAb against BDCA-4 was from Miltenyi Biotech (Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany). IL-3 was obtained from Peprotech (Rocky Hill, NJ). The human enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for IFN-α (Bender Med Systems, Vienna, Austria), TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 (BD PharMingen) were used according to the manufacturers' protocol.
Isolation and culture of PDCs
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from buffy coats of healthy volunteers by Ficoll-Paque density gradient centrifugation (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). PDCs were isolated using the BDCA-4 isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotech) by repeated positive selection until purity of CD123+ HLA-DR+ cells was more than 95%. PDCs were cultured in 96-well plates at 2 × 105 cells/mL in the presence of IL-3 (10 ng/mL) and after a short resting period in calcium-containing medium incubated with the indicated stimuli. Supernatants were harvested after 48 hours for analysis of cytokine production by ELISA.
RNA isolation and reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction
Total RNA was isolated from PDCs using the High Pure RNA Isolation Kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). RNA level was measured by spectrophotometer (Ultro Spec 3000; Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany) at 260 nm. RT-PCR was carried out using 1 μg total RNA and 20 to 100 pmol oligo p(DT)15 primer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). After denaturation at 65°C for 10 minutes, a mixture containing 200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 30 mM MgCl2, 10 mM spermidine, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates, 40 U/μL RNasin ribonuclease inhibitor, and 50 U/μL expand reverse transcriptase (Roche Diagnostics) was added. cDNA synthesis was carried out at 37°C for 60 minutes in a 20-μL reaction volume. Aqua dest (40 μL; Promega, Madison, WI) was added for a concentration of 16.7 ng/μL. Subsequently, 3 μL of the reaction was analyzed by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in a LightCycler device using the Universal ProbeLibrary Set, Human (Roche Diagnostics), in the presence of 10 pmol/μL of forward and reverse primers. Primers were synthesized by Metabion (Martinsried, Germany). Forty-five cycles were carried out at conditions indicated in Table 1, after DNA extension time. Specific amplification was proceeded at 60°C. Hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) was used as the housekeeping gene to normalize for differences in total RNA among samples.
|Gene||Forward primer||Reverse primer||Probes|
|Gene||Forward primer||Reverse primer||Probes|
Intracellular Ca2+ measurements
Ca2+ signaling was measured by flow cytometry as described.9 In short, PDCs were incubated with fluo-3 acetoxymethyl ester (fluo-3/AM, 4 μg/mL) and Fura Red (Fura Red/AM, 10 μg/mL) in the presence of 0.02% pluronic F-127 (all from Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 30 minutes at 37°C. Cells were washed with assay buffer containing 1 mM CaCl2. For analysis, cells were transferred into tubes containing assay buffer at 37°C. Flow rate was adjusted to 100 to 150 events/sec, and P2Y receptor agonists were added. Data were analyzed by plotting the LFL1/LFL3 ratios versus time using FlowJo software (version 3.4; Tree Star, San Carlos, CA) and are expressed as relative values to a maximal signal obtained with a standard dose of ionomycin.
Data are expressed as means plus or minus SEM. Statistical significance was determined by the paired 2-tailed Student t test. Differences were considered statistically significant for P values less than .05.
Human PDCs express mRNA for several P2Y receptors
PDCs were isolated from healthy donors to assess the expression pattern of P2Y receptors by real-time RT-PCR in primary immature PDCs as well as mature PDCs activated with IL-3 and CD40L for 24 hours. Figure 1 shows that immature PDCs express mRNA for several P2Y receptor subtypes, that is, receptors with high affinity to UTP (P2Y4), UDP (P2Y6), and ADP (P2Y12, P2Y13). Interestingly, highest expression levels were found for P2Y14, a receptor for sugar nucleotides, such as UDP-glucose. In contrast, PDCs expressed no mRNA for receptors with high affinity for ATP (ie, P2Y2 and P2Y11). Expression of all P2Y receptor subtypes was found in PBMCs, which served as positive controls. Figure 1 also shows that upon maturation, PDCs down-regulate mRNA expression for P2Y12, P2Y13, and P2Y14, whereas P2Y4 and P2Y6 were unaffected.
Effect of nucleotides on the intracellular free Ca2+ concentration of PDCs
We previously observed that mRNA expression of P2 receptors in DCs does not necessarily reflect the expression of functional membrane-bound receptors.9 Since P2Y receptors are linked to phospholipase C, receptor signaling can be studied by measuring intracellular Ca2+ transients in response to exposure of viable cells to nucleotides. P2Y receptor subtypes exhibit characteristic binding affinities to various nucleotides. ATP and/or ADP interact with P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y11, P2Y12, and P2Y13, whereas uridine nucleotides, such as UTP and UDP, activate the pyrimidine receptors P2Y2, P2Y4, and P2Y6.10 The recently cloned P2Y14 responds to UDP-glucose and related sugar nucleotides.11 As shown in Figure 2, primary PDCs are highly sensitive to UDP, UTP, UDP-glucose, and, to a lesser extent, ADP. This functional profile corresponds to the mRNA expression pattern obtained with RT-PCR (Figure 1). Thus, P2Y4, P2Y6, P2Y14 P2Y12, and P2Y13 receptors are functional in PDCs. No signaling was observed in response to AR-C67085, a specific P2Y11 agonist. Moreover, in accordance with low mRNA expression for the high-affinity ATP receptors, P2Y2 and P2Y11 by RT-PCR, PDCs were less sensitive to ATP, with signaling detected only at concentrations of 100 μM or higher.
Nucleotides induce phenotypic maturation of PDCs
Since the presence of extracellular nucleotides may confer danger to immune cells, thereby inducing activation, we investigated the effect of ATP and other nucleotides on the expression of maturation markers in PDCs. We found that in response to ATP exposure, PDCs moderately up-regulated the expression of CD86 and CD83 (Figure 3), CCR7, and HLA-DR surface expression, the latter being expressed at high levels by PDCs cultured with IL-3 alone. Induction of maturation marker expression was also observed for UTP, UDP, UDP-glucose, and ADP (Figure 3 and data not shown). Since DC activation likely occurs in the context of other stimulatory signals present at sites of inflammation, we analyzed whether ATP (or UDP) synergizes with CD40L, a TNF family member of membrane molecules expressed by activated T cells. These experiments revealed an additive effect between CD40L and nucleotides in regard to induction of CD83, CD86, and CCR7 expression (Figure 3). In addition, CD62L, a molecule mediating lymph node homing of PDCs via L-selectin expressed by high endothelial venules, was down-regulated under these conditions. This expression pattern of surface molecules is indicative of a mature PDC phenotype favoring migration to lymph nodes via the lymphatic route.12
Extracellular nucleotides inhibit IFN-α production by PDCs
Since a key function of PDCs is sensing and responding to microbial challenge by producing type I IFN, we investigated the effect of P2Y receptor signaling on IFN-α production. None of the nucleotides under investigation induced IFN-α production in PDCs (detection limit of the ELISA: 4.8 pg/mL; data not shown). We next addressed whether nucleotides have an impact on IFN-α production induced by virus or specific TLR ligands. First, we stimulated PDCs with influenza virus (PR-8) in the absence or presence of 100 μM ATP. ATP significantly inhibited IFN-α production by PDCs (Figure 4A). Furthermore, ATP inhibited IFN-α production in response to CpG ODN 2216 (CpG-A), a synthetic TLR9 ligand and potent inducer of type I IFN in PDCs. In contrast, ATP had no significant effect on IFN-α production induced by either CpG ODN 2006 (CpG-B) or by the TLR7/8 ligand R-848.
To assess whether this inhibition is a class effect of P2Y receptor agonists, we studied the effect of other nucleotides on IFN-α production by TLR ligand-activated PDCs. Inhibition of CpG-A–induced IFN-α was seen to a similar degree for ATP, UTP, UDP, and UDP-glucose (each 100 μM) (Figure 4B). Again, no inhibition was seen for PDCs stimulated with CpG ODN 2006 or R-848. Thus, nucleotides inducing Ca2+ signaling in PDCs were also effective inhibitors of IFN-α production, indicating a class effect of P2Y receptors.
Kinetic experiments revealed that inhibition of IFN-α was most efficient when ATP exposure occurred either a few hours before or simultaneously with CpG-A exposure. The inhibitory effect decreased over time and was no longer significant when ATP was added 6 hours after CpG-A activation (Figure 5). ATP did not inhibit R-848–induced IFN-α secretion by PDCs, irrespective of the timing of ATP addition (data not shown).
Ligands of P2Y4, P2Y6, and P2Y14 are potent inhibitors of IFN-α production
Targeting specific P2Y receptors may open new treatment options for autoimmune disorders triggered by disregulated type I IFN responses. We therefore analyzed the potency of different P2 receptor agonists in regard to their inhibitory effect on PDC IFN-α production in response to CpG-A. Dose titration experiments revealed striking differences between various nucleotides (Figure 6). IFN-α inhibition was most potent for UDP (P2Y6, EC50: ∼ 0.01 μM), followed by UTP (P2Y4, EC50: ∼ 1 μM), IDP (P2Y6, EC50: ∼ 3 μM), and UDP-glucose (P2Y14, EC50: ∼ 5 μM). ATP and ADP were effective only in the 100-μM range, whereas AR-C67085 (P2Y11) and adenosine (P1 receptors) were ineffective. We previously reported that adenosine can inhibit IFN-α production in mature PDCs via A2a receptors, however, these are not expressed by immature PDCs.13 Thus, the pyrimidinoreceptors P2Y4 and P2Y6 and the recently cloned P2Y14 receptor are potential targets for regulating IFN production in PDCs.
Inhibition of IFN-α production is downstream of CpG ODN uptake and may involve PKC activation
Since both CpG-A and CpG-B bind to the same receptor (ie, TLR9) but ATP inhibited only CpG-A–induced IFN-α production, we speculated that ATP may influence the uptake of different CpG ODN by PDCs. CpG-A has been shown to self-assemble into higher order tertiary structures via G-tetrad formation of their poly(G) motifs forming nanoparticles in the size range of viruses.14 The precise uptake mechanism of different CpG ODNs in PDCs is unknown. To test whether ATP has an impact on CpG ODN uptake, we incubated PDCs with fluorochrome-labeled CpG-A or CpG-B in the absence or presence of ATP. As shown in Figure 7A, ATP had no influence on CpG uptake. Thus, inhibition of IFN-α production by ATP likely occurs downstream of CpG internalization.
To confirm that inhibition of IFN-α production is P2Y receptor mediated, we studied the effect of suramin, an inhibitor of various P2Y receptors, including P2Y6,15 on UDP-mediated IFN-α inhibition in PDCs activated with CpG-A. As shown in Figure 7B, suramin completely abrogated the inhibitory effect of this nucleotide.
Coupling of P2Y receptors to Gq proteins activates intracellular signaling cascades, mainly the phospholipase Cβ isoform mobilizing intracellular Ca2+ via IP3. A target for phospholipase C is diacylglycerol (DAG) leading to protein kinase C (PKC) activation. We, therefore, investigated whether enhancing intracellular Ca2+ levels by the ionophore, ionomycin, impacts IFN production in PDCs. No significant effect on CpG-A–induced IFN-α was observed (Figure 7C). We next investigated the influence of PMA, a potent activator of most PKC isoforms, on IFN-α production by PDCs. Strikingly, as observed for nucleotides, PMA inhibited both influenza virus- and CpG-A–induced, but not R-848– or CpG-B–induced, IFN-α production (Figure 7D). Thus, PKC activation specifically interferes with influenza virus and CpG-A–induced IFN-α production in PDCs. To further study the role of PKC on IFN-α production, we treated PDCs with various PKC inhibitors (chelerythrine, Ro-31–8220, and U73122). Unexpectedly, PKC inhibition interfered with CpG-A–induced IFN-α production and thus could not be applied in this context (data not shown).
In addition to their antiviral properties, type I IFNs are recognized as potent regulators of the innate and adaptive immune response. They enhance the cytotoxicity of natural killer (NK) cells and CD8+ T cells, and, together with IL-12, induce IFN-γ secretion in NK cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells, and, together with IL-6, promote the differentiation of memory B cells into antibody-secreting plasma cells (reviewed in McKenna et al2 ). There is evidence that type I IFNs also play a role in cancer immunosurveillance.16 These reports highlight the importance of type I IFNs—and PDCs as their main source—in the immune system. Increased numbers of PDCs are found in inflamed lymph nodes,17 skin lesions associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE),18,19 psoriasis vulgaris and contact dermatitis,19 epithelioid cell granulomas,20 the nasal mucosa during allergic reactions,21 and tumors,22-24 likely reflecting their contribution to immune responses during viral infection, autoimmunity, and cancer. A better perceptive of type I IFN regulation will be crucial for understanding the pathogenesis of these diseases and for the development of new therapeutic strategies.
IFN induction in PDCs is triggered through TLR7 and TLR9 ligands, including single-stranded RNA and CpG-rich DNA, respectively, as well as by recognition of virus-specific patterns in the cytosol (reviewed in Asselin-Paturel and Trinchieri25 ). There is an emerging array of soluble and pathogen-derived mediators as well as surface receptors that can negatively regulate IFN-α production. These include cross-linking of PDC surface molecules, such as BDCA-2 and CD123,26,27 secreted molecules, including histamine,28 vasoactive intestinal peptide29 and high mobility group B1 protein,30 as well as nonstimulatory DNA sequences.31 However, little is known about the pathways by which these act and whether they inhibit through common signaling mechanisms.
In the present paper, we provide for the first time evidence of a new class of soluble negative regulators of IFN-α production by PDCs. Extracellular nucleotides, natural ligands of membrane G protein–coupled P2Y receptors, were found to be potent inhibitors of IFN-α production by PDCs. Inhibition was seen for both influenza virus (TLR7)–induced and CpG-A (TLR9)–induced PDC activation. Interestingly, induction of IFN-α in response to the synthetic TLR ligands R-848 (TLR7) and CpG-B (TLR9) was not influenced by nucleotides, indicating that P2Y receptor signaling does not universally shut down IFN production. This finding is surprising considering that both CpG-A and CpG-B signal through TLR9. CpG-A and CpG-B were shown to have distinct physical properties, with CpG-A aggregating spontaneously to form nanoparticles,14 which might potentially result in different routes of internalization. We could rule out that the mechanism of action of ATP was simply interfering with the uptake of either CpG ODN class by PDCs, implicating a more downstream signaling effect. There is evidence that CpG-A and CpG-B activate PDCs differently, however the precise signaling differences are poorly defined.32 P2Y receptors are coupled to transductional G proteins. P2Y12,13,14 predominantly couple to Gi/o proteins inhibiting adenylate cyclase, whereas the uridine nucleotide receptors P2Y6 and P2Y4 use Gq/G11 to activate phospholipase Cβ/PKC and IP3 pathways (reviewed in Abbracchio et al10 ). IFN inhibition correlated with strength of calcium signaling and was most potent for ligands of P2Y6 (ie, UDP and IDP) and P2Y4 (UTP), indicating a role for phospholipase Cβ/PKC in IFN-α inhibition. Furthermore, the PKC activator PMA exhibited the same functional profile as nucleotides, with potent inhibition of CpG-A– and influenza virus–induced IFN-α production, but not CpG-B– or R-848–induced IFN-α production by PDCs. Unfortunately, the role of PKC on nucleotide-induced IFN-α regulation could not be studied directly, as PKC inhibitors directly interfered with IFN-α production by PDCs.
This leads to the question, at which level does PKC interfere with the regulation of type I IFN production in PDCs? PKC has been shown to play a role in the formation of mature lysosomes.33 Thus, PKC signaling may result in a more efficient trafficking of endocytosed material, such as CpG ODN, from endosomes into lysosomes in PDCs. Honda et al reported that spatiotemporal regulation of MyD88-IRF-7 signaling is critical for the induction of high levels of IFN in response to TLR9 activation.34 They also demonstrated that CpG-A, but not CpG-B, is retained for long periods in PDC endosomal compartments thereby activating MyD88-IRF-7, which results in the induction of high levels of IFN-α. A reduced retention time of CpG-A in endosomes via accelerated lysosome formation could explain why nucleotides/PMA have such a potent inhibitory effect on CpG-A–, but not CpG-B–induced IFN in PDCs. Identifying the precise mechanism of IFN inhibition by nucleotides is the subject of further investigations by our laboratory.
Pharmacological studies using nucleotides with distinct affinities for P2Y receptors revealed that uridine nucleotides have the highest inhibitory potency on IFN-α production. UDP (P2Y6) was effective in the nanomolar range, followed by UTP (P2Y4), IDP (P2Y6), and UDP-glucose (P2Y14) in the low micromolar range, whereas the adenine nucleotides ATP and ADP were inhibitory only in the high micromolar range. This finding correlated with functional P2Y receptor analysis measuring Ca2+ transients in PDCs and RT-PCR expression profiling. In contrast, PDCs were only weakly sensitive to ATP and insensitive to a specific P2Y11 agonist, correlating with the lack of mRNA expression for P2Y2 and P2Y11 receptors. In this respect, PDCs differ strikingly from myeloid DCs, in which P2Y11 signaling regulates critical functions, such as maturation and induction of migration and cytokine production.8,9,35 In fact, lack of specific ATP receptors and low sensitivity to ATP in calcium signaling assays may indicate that the biologic effects of ATP on PDCs, such as maturation induction and type I IFN regulation, are rather mediated by the breakdown product ADP generated by ectonucleotidases leading to signaling via P2Y12 or P2Y13. Ecto-ATPase expression has been described for DCs in lymph nodes36 and monocyte-derived DCs.37 As data for PDCs are currently lacking, we assessed CD39 expression by flow cytometry, but no expression was found (data not shown). This finding, however, does not rule out expression of other ectonucleotidases. Since CD39 is ubiquitously expressed in tissues, degradation of extracellular ATP to ADP is likely to play a role in nucleotide-induced signaling in PDCs in vivo.
It has been proposed that nucleotides induce a distorted maturation of myeloid DCs by inhibiting IL-12p70 but enhancing the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in response to TLR ligands or CD40L.5,38 Interestingly, in one study ATP enhanced IL-10 production via the P2Y11 receptor, whereas in another study ADP was inhibitory.37 In contrast to myeloid DCs, PDCs are poor producers of IL-10.39 In line with this report, IL-10 levels were near the detection limit of the ELISA for all stimulation conditions in our study (data not shown).
What is the physiological consequence of P2Y receptor signaling in PDCs? Nucleotides are released and accumulate at sites of inflammation, tissue damage, or cell stress. PDCs located in the vicinity are likely to be exposed to nucleotide concentrations sufficient to activate P2Y receptors. As a consequence, PDCs up-regulate the chemokine receptor CCR7 and undergo phenotypic maturation, enabling them to migrate from peripheral sites to draining lymph nodes via the lymphatic route and to interact efficiently with T cells. On the other hand, PDCs exposed to IFN-inducing stimuli, such as DNA or virus, will be primed toward a reduced IFN-α response. Inhibition of IFN production by nucleotides may play an important negative regulatory mechanism for avoiding excessive tissue damage or the induction of autoimmunity. As the kinetic experiments demonstrated, nucleotides may (a) condition PDCs to low type I IFN-producing capacity (eg, in situations when dying cells release nucleotides before PDCs are exposed to TLR ligands, such as dsDNA-antibody complexes found in SLE) or (b) inhibit IFN production even several hours after TLR9 activation (release of nucleotides in draining lymph nodes, eg, from activated T cells, may still be sufficient to limit IFN-α production). The distinct P2Y receptor repertoire expressed by PDCs (such as P2Y6, P2Y4, and the recently cloned P2Y14 receptor) highlights the possibility for designing new drugs to target this specific P2Y receptor repertoire for inhibiting type I IFN responses in vivo.
Another consequence of nucleotide exposure of PDCs could be tolerance induction to tumors. Tumor cells release nucleotides via lytic (necrosis) as well as nonlytic mechanisms.40 Tolerogenic PDCs have been isolated from lymph node–draining tumors.41 These suppressive PDCs were found to express indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO). Interestingly, ATP can up-regulate IDO in DCs.42 Nucleotide release by tumor cells could thus be an immune escape mechanism by (a) inducing IDO in lymph node resident DCs and (b) inhibiting Th1 immune responses by limiting type I IFN production. This hypothesis deserves further evaluation in tumor models.
In conclusion, this is the first report to demonstrate that human PDCs express a characteristic P2Y receptor repertoire rendering them highly sensitive to uridine nucleotides. After nucleotide exposure, PDCs acquire a mature phenotype, which is synergistically enhanced by CD40L. In addition, nucleotides are potent negative regulators of IFN-α production. Since IFN-α is a key cytokine with effects on both innate and adoptive immunity, manipulating its production has potential in the development of novel therapeutic strategies against infectious disease, autoimmune disorders, and cancer. In particular, drugs acting on P2Y4, P2Y6, or P2Y14 receptors may prove useful for the treatment of IFN-mediated autoimmune disorders (such as SLE), where overproduction of IFN-α contributes to disease progression.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.
The authors thank Dr. W. Chen for virus preparation and Tristan McAlpine and Marina Zupper for technical assistance.
This work was supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe (Max Eder Research Grant to M. Schnurr), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GK1202) to M. Schnurr, a Program Grant from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NH&MRC) to E.M., and the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research. E.M. is an employee of CSL limited and an Honorary Senior Research Fellow of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research.
Contribution: A.S. designed and performed research and collected and analyzed data; T.T., S.R., N.R., J.V., and M.D. performed research and collected and analyzed data; M. Stuplich performed research and collected data; S.E. and J.C. wrote the paper; E.M. analyzed data and wrote the paper; and M. Schnurr designed and performed research, collected and analyzed data, and wrote the paper.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: E.M. is employed by CSL Limited, but none of its potential products was studied in the present work. The other authors declare no competing financial interests.
Correspondence: Max Schnurr, Medizinische Klinik der Universität München, Campus Innenstadt, Ziemssenstr. 1, D-80336 München, Germany; e-mail: Max.Schnurr@med.uni-muenchen.de.