## Abstract

We assessed late mortality in 1479 individuals who had survived 2 or more years after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Median age at HCT was 25.9 years and median length of follow-up was 9.5 years. The conditional survival probability at 15 years from HCT was 80.2% (SE = 1.9%) for those who were disease-free at entry into the cohort, and the relative mortality was 9.9 (95% confidence interval, 8.7-11.2). Relative mortality decreased with time from HCT, but remained significantly elevated at 15 years after HCT (standardized mortality ratio = 2.2). Relapse of primary disease (29%) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD: 22%) were the leading causes of premature death. Nonrelapse-related mortality was increased among patients older than 18 years at HCT (18-45 years: relative risk [RR] = 1.7; 46+ years: RR = 3.7) and among those with cGVHD (RR = 2.7), and was lower among patients who received methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis (RR = 0.5). HCT survivors were more likely to report difficulty in holding jobs (odds ratio [OR] = 13.9), and in obtaining health (OR = 7.1) or life (OR = 9.9) insurance compared with siblings. This study demonstrates that mortality rates remain twice as high as that of the general population among 15-year survivors of HCT, and that the survivors face challenges affecting their health and well-being.

## Introduction

Liberalization in the indications for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) as well as an increase in options in the source of the hematopoietic stem cell are responsible for the increasing number of HCTs performed annually.1  Long-term survival has become an expected outcome for patients undergoing HCT. A limited number of studies that are either small in size or represent registry data have examined late mortality for patients undergoing allogeneic HCT.2-4  Some studies have also attempted to describe the health and functional status of individuals surviving allogeneic HCT.4-7  However, these studies have generally used passive rather than active follow-up methods and have not included evaluations using the National Death Index (NDI) or the Social Security Death Index (SSDI) to ensure completeness. Our study represents a comprehensive analysis of disease- and treatment-related factors associated with late mortality, using NDI, SSDI, and medical records, in a large cohort of allogeneic hematopoietic cell (HC) recipients. Furthermore, results presented here describe specific aspects of functional status such as marital status, employment, and problems with health and life insurance experienced by the long-term survivors of allogeneic HCT

## Patients and methods

The Bone Marrow Transplant Survivor Study (BMTSS), a collaborative effort between City of Hope National Medical Center (COH) and the University of Minnesota (UMN), examines the long-term outcomes of individuals who have survived 2 or more years after undergoing HCT. The present report from BMTSS is restricted to individuals who met the following eligibility criteria: (1) primary diagnoses of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), severe aplastic anemia (SAA), or inborn errors of metabolism (IEM); (2) allogeneic HCT between 1974 and 1998; and (3) survival of at least 2 years from HCT. The Human Subjects Committee at the participating institutions approved the BMTSS protocol. Informed consent was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

### Mortality analysis

Information on primary diagnoses, therapeutic agents used for preparative regimens, and the source of donor stem cells (sibling vs unrelated donor), presence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), and the agents used for GVHD prophylaxis was obtained on all eligible cases from the institutional transplant databases.

Vital status information was obtained from 3 sources: medical records, NDI, and SSDI. Vital status of the BMTSS subjects was ascertained as of June 30, 2003. Information on the cause of death was obtained from the NDI Plus program and the medical records.

Standardized mortality ratio (SMR, the ratio of observed to expected deaths) was used to compare the mortality of this cohort to the age- (5-year interval), sex-, and calendar-specific (1975-1979, 1980-1984, 1985-1989, 1990-1994, 1995-1999) mortality of the US general population.8  Person-years at risk were computed from the date 2 years after HCT to either the date of death or date of censoring (June 30, 2003, for those still alive). The expected number of deaths was calculated9  by multiplying the number of person-years in each defined stratum by the corresponding US mortality rates reported by the National Center for Health Statistics.8  Ninety-five percent confidence interval of the SMR was calculated using the method described by Vandenbroucke.10  SMRs were calculated for deaths from all causes and also for deaths from specific causes, including secondary or subsequent cancer, cardiac toxicity, pulmonary complications, and external causes (accidents, suicides, homicides, etc).

Survival functions were estimated by the product-limit method by sex and age. To compare survival curves for this cohort with the age-comparable US population, an expected number of deaths for each year since transplantation was calculated based on the US age-, sex-, and calendar-specific mortality rates, yielding an expected survival function by sex.

Potential risk factors for late deaths were analyzed using Cox regression models.11  Factors evaluated included age at transplantation (categorized as younger than 18, 18 to 45, and older than 45 years), sex, race, primary diagnosis, type of donor stem cells, disease status at transplantation (standard risk of relapse at HCT and high risk of relapse at HCT), preparative regimens used, presence of cGVHD, and agents used for GVHD prophylaxis. Patients who underwent transplantation in first or second complete remission after acute leukemia and lymphoma or first chronic phase of CML were considered being at standard risk for relapse. All other patients were considered at high-risk for relapse. Analyses were performed for the entire cohort, for both relapse-related and nonrelapse-related mortality.

### Analysis of marital status, employment, and health/life insurance

Data on specific aspects of functional well-being including marital status, employment, and problems with health and life insurance were collected from the surviving members of the study cohort who were 18 years or older at study participation, using the BMTSS questionnaire. This questionnaire was designed to capture a wide range of information including demographic characteristics, marital status, insurance coverage, education, income, and employment. For comparison purposes, 319 nearest-age siblings also completed the BMTSS questionnaire.

Chi-square test was used to compare distributions of functional well-being between survivors and siblings. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) after adjustment for age at study participation, sex, race and education. For analysis restricted to HCT survivors only, variables examined in the logistic regression were age at transplantation (younger than 18, 18-45, older than 45 years), sex, race (white, Hispanic, others), education (less than high school, high school graduate to some college, college graduate or higher), household income (> $60 000,$20 000-$60 000, <$20 000), primary diagnosis, cGVHD status (yes, no), length of follow-up (≤ 5, 6-10, 11 + years), and year of transplantation (1974-1979, 1980-1984, 1985-1989, 1990-1994, and 1995-1998).

## Results

### Patient characteristics

Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the study population for the entire cohort, and by primary diagnosis. In this cohort, 1479 patients had undergone allogeneic HCT at COH or UMN, and survived 2 years, irrespective of disease status. Of these, 861 (58%) were male; the median age at HCT was 25.9 years (range, 0.2 to 71.5 years), and the cohort was followed for a median of 9.5 years (range, 2.0 to 28.4 years). Primary diagnoses included CML (31%), AML (29%), ALL (19%), SAA (12%), IEM (5%), and NHL (4%). The large majority (80.7%) of patients had received stem cells from a related donor, and bone marrow (96%) was the major source of stem cells. Total body irradiation (TBI) was used as part of the conditioning regimen in 87% of the cohort, while cyclophosphamide was used in 72% and etoposide in 27% of the cohort.

Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of 2-year survivors of allogeneic HCT

VariablesEntire cohort, n = 1479Primary diagnosis
AML, n = 429CML, n = 452ALL, n = 287NHL, n = 53SAA, n = 175IEM, n = 83
Median age at HCT, y (range) 25.9 (0.2-71.5) 26.2 (0.9-61.0) 34.3 (1.1-71.5) 17.8 (0.5-51.9) 37.3 (5.7-53.3) 16.9 (1.7-46.7) 2.6 (0.2-32.9)
Age at transplantation, y (%)
Younger than 18 505 (34.1) 142 (33.1) 35 (7.7) 145 (50.5) 6 (11.3) 97 (55.4) 80 (96.4)
18 to 45 853 (57.7) 247 (57.6) 356 (78.8) 133 (46.3) 37 (69.8) 77 (44.0) 3 (3.6)
Older than 45 121 (8.2) 40 (9.3) 61 (13.5) 9 (3.1) 10 (18.9) 1 (0.6) 0 (0)
Sex, no. (% male) 861 (58.2) 223 (52.0) 261 (57.7) 192 (66.9) 33 (62.3) 103 (58.9) 49 (59.0)
Type of donor, no. (%)
Related donor 1193 (80.7) 373 (86.9) 327 (72.3) 241 (84.0) 48 (90.6) 159 (90.9) 45 (54.2)
Unrelated donor 286 (19.3) 56 (13.1) 125 (27.7) 46 (16.0) 5 (9.4) 16 (9.1) 38 (45.8)
Source of stem cell, no. (%)
BM 1416 (95.7) 412 (96.1) 443 (98.0) 277 (96.5) 39 (73.6) 171 (97.7) 74 (89.2)
PBSCs 35 (2.4) 11 (2.6) 8 (1.8) 2 (0.7) 14 (26.4) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Cord blood 28 (1.9) 6 (1.4) 1 (0.2) 8 (2.8) 0 (0) 4 (2.3) 9 (10.8)
Year of transplantation, no. (%)
1974 to 1979 55 (3.7) 18 (4.2) 0 (0) 12 (4.2) 4 (7.5) 21 (12.0) 0 (0)
1980 to 1984 224 (15.1) 73 (17.1) 41 (9.1) 62 (21.6) 6 (11.3) 40 (22.9) 2 (2.4)
1985 to 1989 293 (19.8) 88 (20.5) 92 (20.4) 52 (18.1) 5 (9.4) 34 (19.4) 22 (26.5)
1990 to 1994 450 (30.4) 120 (28.0) 180 (39.8) 80 (27.9) 7 (13.2) 38 (21.7) 25 (.0.1)
1995 to 1998 457 (30.9) 130 (30.3) 139 (30.8) 81 (28.2) 31 (58.5) 42 (24.0) 34 (41.0)
Median time since HCT, mo (range) 9.5 (2.0-28.4) 10 (2.0-26.5) 9.4 (2.1-21.9) 9.2 (2.0-26.3) 6.3 (2.1-27.7) 13.1 (2.0-28.4) 8.0 (2.1-19.0)
Conditioning regimen, no. (%)
TLI 1279 (86.5) 368 (85.8) 423 (93.6) 280 (97.9) 48 (90.6) 119 (68.0) 41 (49.4)
Cyclophosphamide 1066 (72.1) 316 (73.7) 318 (70.4) 188 (65.7) 43 (81.1) 157 (89.7) 44 (53.0)
Busulfan 164 (11.1) 77 (17.9) 31 (6.9) 10 (3.5) 4 (7.5) 0 (0) 42 (50.6)
VP16 403 (27.3) 129 (30.1) 138 (30.5) 124 (43.4) 12 (22.6) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Cytarabine 72 (4.9) 35 (8.2) 2 (0.4) 35 (12.2) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Disease status at HCT, no. (%)
High risk of relapse 364 (24.7) 142 (33.3) 133 (29.5) 68 (23.7) 21 (41.2) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Chronic GVHD 730 (49.7) 206 (48.6) 286 (63.3) 119 (41.9) 35 (67.3) 66 (37.7) 18 (21.7)
Institutions (%)
COH 722 (48.8) 230 (53.6) 241 (53.3) 159 (55.4) 34 (64.2) 58 (33.1) 0 (0)
UMN 757 (51.2) 199 (46.4) 211 (46.7) 128 (44.6) 19 (35.8) 117 (66.9) 83 (100)
No. of deaths (%) 320 (21.6) 107 (24.9) 98 (21.7) 71 (24.7) 13 (24.5) 19 (10.9) 12 (14.5)
Median age at death, y (range) 33.4 (2.7-63.7) 33.4 (5.2-62.6) 42.7 (5.0-63.7) 25.1 (5.0-53.8) 44.2 (19.7-62.2) 29.8 (7.8-55.5) 7.6 (2.7-17.5)
Relapse in the first 2 y of HCT (ie, before entry into cohort), no. (%)
History of relapse 127 (8.6) 36 (8.4) 46 (10.2) 35 (12.2) 8 (15.1) 2 (1.1) 0 (0)
No history of relapse 1352 (91.4) 393 (91.6) 406 (89.8) 252 (87.8) 45 (84.9) 173 (98.9) 83 (100)
VariablesEntire cohort, n = 1479Primary diagnosis
AML, n = 429CML, n = 452ALL, n = 287NHL, n = 53SAA, n = 175IEM, n = 83
Median age at HCT, y (range) 25.9 (0.2-71.5) 26.2 (0.9-61.0) 34.3 (1.1-71.5) 17.8 (0.5-51.9) 37.3 (5.7-53.3) 16.9 (1.7-46.7) 2.6 (0.2-32.9)
Age at transplantation, y (%)
Younger than 18 505 (34.1) 142 (33.1) 35 (7.7) 145 (50.5) 6 (11.3) 97 (55.4) 80 (96.4)
18 to 45 853 (57.7) 247 (57.6) 356 (78.8) 133 (46.3) 37 (69.8) 77 (44.0) 3 (3.6)
Older than 45 121 (8.2) 40 (9.3) 61 (13.5) 9 (3.1) 10 (18.9) 1 (0.6) 0 (0)
Sex, no. (% male) 861 (58.2) 223 (52.0) 261 (57.7) 192 (66.9) 33 (62.3) 103 (58.9) 49 (59.0)
Type of donor, no. (%)
Related donor 1193 (80.7) 373 (86.9) 327 (72.3) 241 (84.0) 48 (90.6) 159 (90.9) 45 (54.2)
Unrelated donor 286 (19.3) 56 (13.1) 125 (27.7) 46 (16.0) 5 (9.4) 16 (9.1) 38 (45.8)
Source of stem cell, no. (%)
BM 1416 (95.7) 412 (96.1) 443 (98.0) 277 (96.5) 39 (73.6) 171 (97.7) 74 (89.2)
PBSCs 35 (2.4) 11 (2.6) 8 (1.8) 2 (0.7) 14 (26.4) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Cord blood 28 (1.9) 6 (1.4) 1 (0.2) 8 (2.8) 0 (0) 4 (2.3) 9 (10.8)
Year of transplantation, no. (%)
1974 to 1979 55 (3.7) 18 (4.2) 0 (0) 12 (4.2) 4 (7.5) 21 (12.0) 0 (0)
1980 to 1984 224 (15.1) 73 (17.1) 41 (9.1) 62 (21.6) 6 (11.3) 40 (22.9) 2 (2.4)
1985 to 1989 293 (19.8) 88 (20.5) 92 (20.4) 52 (18.1) 5 (9.4) 34 (19.4) 22 (26.5)
1990 to 1994 450 (30.4) 120 (28.0) 180 (39.8) 80 (27.9) 7 (13.2) 38 (21.7) 25 (.0.1)
1995 to 1998 457 (30.9) 130 (30.3) 139 (30.8) 81 (28.2) 31 (58.5) 42 (24.0) 34 (41.0)
Median time since HCT, mo (range) 9.5 (2.0-28.4) 10 (2.0-26.5) 9.4 (2.1-21.9) 9.2 (2.0-26.3) 6.3 (2.1-27.7) 13.1 (2.0-28.4) 8.0 (2.1-19.0)
Conditioning regimen, no. (%)
TLI 1279 (86.5) 368 (85.8) 423 (93.6) 280 (97.9) 48 (90.6) 119 (68.0) 41 (49.4)
Cyclophosphamide 1066 (72.1) 316 (73.7) 318 (70.4) 188 (65.7) 43 (81.1) 157 (89.7) 44 (53.0)
Busulfan 164 (11.1) 77 (17.9) 31 (6.9) 10 (3.5) 4 (7.5) 0 (0) 42 (50.6)
VP16 403 (27.3) 129 (30.1) 138 (30.5) 124 (43.4) 12 (22.6) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Cytarabine 72 (4.9) 35 (8.2) 2 (0.4) 35 (12.2) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Disease status at HCT, no. (%)
High risk of relapse 364 (24.7) 142 (33.3) 133 (29.5) 68 (23.7) 21 (41.2) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Chronic GVHD 730 (49.7) 206 (48.6) 286 (63.3) 119 (41.9) 35 (67.3) 66 (37.7) 18 (21.7)
Institutions (%)
COH 722 (48.8) 230 (53.6) 241 (53.3) 159 (55.4) 34 (64.2) 58 (33.1) 0 (0)
UMN 757 (51.2) 199 (46.4) 211 (46.7) 128 (44.6) 19 (35.8) 117 (66.9) 83 (100)
No. of deaths (%) 320 (21.6) 107 (24.9) 98 (21.7) 71 (24.7) 13 (24.5) 19 (10.9) 12 (14.5)
Median age at death, y (range) 33.4 (2.7-63.7) 33.4 (5.2-62.6) 42.7 (5.0-63.7) 25.1 (5.0-53.8) 44.2 (19.7-62.2) 29.8 (7.8-55.5) 7.6 (2.7-17.5)
Relapse in the first 2 y of HCT (ie, before entry into cohort), no. (%)
History of relapse 127 (8.6) 36 (8.4) 46 (10.2) 35 (12.2) 8 (15.1) 2 (1.1) 0 (0)
No history of relapse 1352 (91.4) 393 (91.6) 406 (89.8) 252 (87.8) 45 (84.9) 173 (98.9) 83 (100)

AML indicates acute myeloid leukemia; CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; SAA, severe aplastic anemia; IEM, inborn errors of metabolism; BM, bone marrow; PBSC, peripheral blood stem cells; and TLI, total body irradiation.

### Overall survival

By June 30, 2003, 21.6% (n = 320) of the patients who had undergone HCT between 1974 and 1998, and survived at least 2 years, had died. Median age at death was 33.4 years. Most of the deaths (69%) occurred in the 2- to 5-year period after allogeneic HCT, although 43 deaths (13%) did occur after 10 years from HCT. For the entire cohort, the probability of surviving was 86.6% (SE = 0.9%) at 5 years, 80.4% (SE = 1.3%) at 10 years, and 76.3% (SE = 1.9%) at 15 years from HCT. All-cause mortality experience from 2 years after HCT for the entire cohort was compared with age-adjusted expected survival rates for the US population and is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

All-cause mortality in a cohort of 1479 2+-year survivors after allogeneic HCT. Sex-specific survival for hematologic malignancies, severe aplastic anemia, and inborn errors of metabolism for the entire cohort.

Figure 1

All-cause mortality in a cohort of 1479 2+-year survivors after allogeneic HCT. Sex-specific survival for hematologic malignancies, severe aplastic anemia, and inborn errors of metabolism for the entire cohort.

In this cohort of 1479 patients, a total of 127 patients had suffered at least one relapse in the first 2 years after HCT (ie, at entry into this cohort), and all subsequent analyses presented here excluded these 127 patients. Among the patients who did not suffer a relapse by 2 years after HCT, the probability of survival was 90.2% (SE = 0.8%) at 5 years, 84.6% (SE = 1.3%) at 10 years, and 80.2% (SE = 1.9%) at 15 years from HCT. Patients who underwent transplantation for SAA had a better probability of surviving than those who underwent transplantation for other diseases (Table 2). The 5-year and 10-year survival probability by diagnosis for patients with and without cGVHD is also presented in Table 2.

Table 2

Five- and 10-year overall survival by primary diagnosis and cGVHD status in patients surviving disease-free for 2 years after allogeneic HCT

DiagnosisOverall
Without cGVHD
With cGVHD
10-y
5-y10-y5-y10-y5-y
Entire cohort 90.2 (0.8) 84.6 (1.3) 95.1 (0.9) 91.0 (1.4) 85.5 (1.4) 78.1 (2.1)
Acute myeloid leukemia 89.3 (1.6) 82.8 (2.4) 95.5 (1.5) 92.1 (2.3) 83.0 (2.8) 73.2 (4.2)
Chronic myeloid leukemia 90.4 (1.5) 83.3 (2.5) 94.4 (1.9) 89.5 (3.5) 88.2 (2.1) 79.8 (3.4)
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia 88.5 (2.1) 83.9 (3.0) 93.6 (2.1) 86.7 (3.5) 82.5 (3.9) 81.5 (5.2)
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 86.7 (5.5) 70.7 (10.6) 92.9 (7.9) 80.0 (14.7) 83.3 (7.3) 64.8 (14.5)
Severe aplastic anemia 95.9 (1.5) 93.8 (2.2) 99.1 (0.9) 99.1 (1.2) 90.7 (3.7) 85.5 (4.9)
Inborn errors of metabolism 89.1 (3.6) 86.4 (5.6) 92.3 (3.5) 90.5 (5.8) 77.8 (9.8) 72.2 (12.7)
DiagnosisOverall
Without cGVHD
With cGVHD
10-y
5-y10-y5-y10-y5-y
Entire cohort 90.2 (0.8) 84.6 (1.3) 95.1 (0.9) 91.0 (1.4) 85.5 (1.4) 78.1 (2.1)
Acute myeloid leukemia 89.3 (1.6) 82.8 (2.4) 95.5 (1.5) 92.1 (2.3) 83.0 (2.8) 73.2 (4.2)
Chronic myeloid leukemia 90.4 (1.5) 83.3 (2.5) 94.4 (1.9) 89.5 (3.5) 88.2 (2.1) 79.8 (3.4)
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia 88.5 (2.1) 83.9 (3.0) 93.6 (2.1) 86.7 (3.5) 82.5 (3.9) 81.5 (5.2)
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 86.7 (5.5) 70.7 (10.6) 92.9 (7.9) 80.0 (14.7) 83.3 (7.3) 64.8 (14.5)
Severe aplastic anemia 95.9 (1.5) 93.8 (2.2) 99.1 (0.9) 99.1 (1.2) 90.7 (3.7) 85.5 (4.9)
Inborn errors of metabolism 89.1 (3.6) 86.4 (5.6) 92.3 (3.5) 90.5 (5.8) 77.8 (9.8) 72.2 (12.7)

Data are all percentages (SE).

### Relative mortality

Table 3 summarizes the relative mortality in this population, using age-, sex-, and calendar-specific rates from the general US population. Overall, premature death occurred 10 times more often than expected. High relative mortality rates were seen in both male (8-fold increased risk) and female (13-fold increased risk) patients. Relative mortality was elevated across all age groups, but was highest in subjects undergoing HCT when younger than 18 years (17-fold). High relative mortality was also observed across all diagnoses, with the highest relative mortality among individuals with a primary diagnosis of IEM (37-fold). Relative mortality was highest in the 2- to 5-year period after allogeneic HCT (78-fold), and declined dramatically in the 6- to 10-year period (8-fold). Relative mortality remained elevated (2-fold above that of the general population) in patients followed for more than 15 years after HCT.

Table 3

Standardized mortality ratio (SMR) among 2-year survivors of allogeneic HCT

VariablesEntire cohort
Standard risk of relapse
High risk of relapse
No. of deathsSMR (95% CI)No. of deathsSMR (95% CI)No. of deathsSMR (95% CI)
All patients 241 9.9 (8.7-11.2) 152 8.4 (7.1-9.8) 88 14.5 (11.7-17.7)
Sex
Male 147 8.2 (6.9-9.6) 97 7.4 (6.0-8.9) 50 10.8 (8.0-14.0)
Female 94 12.8 (10.3-15.5) 55 9.9 (7.4-12.6) 38 21.5 (15.2-28.9)
Age at transplantation, y
Younger than 18 63 16.5 (12.7-20.8) 48 14.6 (10.8-19.0) 15 28.8 (16.1-45.3)
18 to 45 150 9.1 (7.7-10.6) 92 7.7 (6.2-9.3) 57 12.9 (9.8-16.5)
Older than 45 28 7.1 (4.7-9.9) 12 4.2 (2.2-7.0) 16 14.2 (8.1-22.0)
Year of transplantation
1974 to 1979 15 9.4 (5.2-14.7) 13 9.4 (5.0-15.3) 13.4 (1.3-38.5)
1980 to 1984 49 7.9 (5.8-10.2) 34 7.4 (5.1-10.1) 15 9.2 (5.1-14.5)
1985 to 1989 63 10.5 (8.1-13.3) 39 8.9 (6.3-11.9) 24 15.0 (9.6-21.6)
1990 to 1994 71 11.2 (8.7-13.9) 49 10.2 (7.5-13.2) 21 13.8 (8.5-20.3)
1995 to 1998 43 10.5 (7.6-13.8) 17 5.8 (3.4-8.9) 26 22.5 (14.7-31.9)
Survival after diagnosis
2 to 5 y 149 77.5 (65.6-90.5) 92 73.5 (59.2-89.3) 57 85.0 (64.4-108.5)
6 to 10 y 50 8.3 (6.1-10.7) 29 6.3 (4.2-8.8) 20 13.9 (8.5-20.7)
11 to 15 y 21 3.7 (2.3-5.4) 15 3.7 (2.0-5.7) 3.6 (1.3-7.2)
16 to 20 y 20 2.9 (1.8-4.3) 15 3.0 (1.7-4.8) 2.5 (0.8-5.2)
21+ y 0.3 (0.0001-1.1) 0.3 (0.0001-1.2) —
Chronic graft-versus-host disease
Yes 158 12.4 (10.5-14.4) 95 10.6 (8.6-12.9) 62 16.8 (12.8-21.2)
No 78 6.9 (5.4-8.5) 53 5.9 (4.4-7.6) 25 10.6 (6.9-15.2)
Primary diagnosis
AML 82 10.8 (8.6-13.3) 46 8.5 (6.2-11.1) 36 17.3 (12.1-23.5)
CML 74 8.2 (6.4-10.2) 41 6.8 (4.9-9.1) 33 11.0 (7.6-15.0)
ALL 46 12.8 (9.4-16.8) 32 10.9 (7.5-15.1) 14 21.0 (11.5-33.5)
NHL 10 12.5 (6.0-21.5) 8.5 (2.2-18.9) 16.1 (5.1-33.4)
SAA 17 5.7 (3.3-8.8) 17 5.7 (3.3-8.8) —
IEM 12 36.7 (18.9-60.4) 12 36.7 (18.9-60.4) —
VariablesEntire cohort
Standard risk of relapse
High risk of relapse
No. of deathsSMR (95% CI)No. of deathsSMR (95% CI)No. of deathsSMR (95% CI)
All patients 241 9.9 (8.7-11.2) 152 8.4 (7.1-9.8) 88 14.5 (11.7-17.7)
Sex
Male 147 8.2 (6.9-9.6) 97 7.4 (6.0-8.9) 50 10.8 (8.0-14.0)
Female 94 12.8 (10.3-15.5) 55 9.9 (7.4-12.6) 38 21.5 (15.2-28.9)
Age at transplantation, y
Younger than 18 63 16.5 (12.7-20.8) 48 14.6 (10.8-19.0) 15 28.8 (16.1-45.3)
18 to 45 150 9.1 (7.7-10.6) 92 7.7 (6.2-9.3) 57 12.9 (9.8-16.5)
Older than 45 28 7.1 (4.7-9.9) 12 4.2 (2.2-7.0) 16 14.2 (8.1-22.0)
Year of transplantation
1974 to 1979 15 9.4 (5.2-14.7) 13 9.4 (5.0-15.3) 13.4 (1.3-38.5)
1980 to 1984 49 7.9 (5.8-10.2) 34 7.4 (5.1-10.1) 15 9.2 (5.1-14.5)
1985 to 1989 63 10.5 (8.1-13.3) 39 8.9 (6.3-11.9) 24 15.0 (9.6-21.6)
1990 to 1994 71 11.2 (8.7-13.9) 49 10.2 (7.5-13.2) 21 13.8 (8.5-20.3)
1995 to 1998 43 10.5 (7.6-13.8) 17 5.8 (3.4-8.9) 26 22.5 (14.7-31.9)
Survival after diagnosis
2 to 5 y 149 77.5 (65.6-90.5) 92 73.5 (59.2-89.3) 57 85.0 (64.4-108.5)
6 to 10 y 50 8.3 (6.1-10.7) 29 6.3 (4.2-8.8) 20 13.9 (8.5-20.7)
11 to 15 y 21 3.7 (2.3-5.4) 15 3.7 (2.0-5.7) 3.6 (1.3-7.2)
16 to 20 y 20 2.9 (1.8-4.3) 15 3.0 (1.7-4.8) 2.5 (0.8-5.2)
21+ y 0.3 (0.0001-1.1) 0.3 (0.0001-1.2) —
Chronic graft-versus-host disease
Yes 158 12.4 (10.5-14.4) 95 10.6 (8.6-12.9) 62 16.8 (12.8-21.2)
No 78 6.9 (5.4-8.5) 53 5.9 (4.4-7.6) 25 10.6 (6.9-15.2)
Primary diagnosis
AML 82 10.8 (8.6-13.3) 46 8.5 (6.2-11.1) 36 17.3 (12.1-23.5)
CML 74 8.2 (6.4-10.2) 41 6.8 (4.9-9.1) 33 11.0 (7.6-15.0)
ALL 46 12.8 (9.4-16.8) 32 10.9 (7.5-15.1) 14 21.0 (11.5-33.5)
NHL 10 12.5 (6.0-21.5) 8.5 (2.2-18.9) 16.1 (5.1-33.4)
SAA 17 5.7 (3.3-8.8) 17 5.7 (3.3-8.8) —
IEM 12 36.7 (18.9-60.4) 12 36.7 (18.9-60.4) —

SMR indicates standardized mortality ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; and —, not applicable.

One subject with unknown disease status at the time of HCT was excluded from the analysis.

One subject with unknown cGVHD status was excluded from the analysis.

### Specific causes of death

Two hundred forty-one deaths were observed in patients who had survived disease free for 2 years after HCT. Relapse of primary disease was the leading cause of death, with 70 deaths (29% of all deaths) attributed to recurrence of the primary disease. Forty-seven (67%) deaths due to primary disease occurred between the second and fifth year of follow-up; 19 (27%) occurred in the next 5 years, while only 4 deaths (6%) due to primary disease occurred after 10 years from HCT. cGVHD was the second most common cause of late mortality in this cohort, accounting for 53 deaths (22%), while late infection in the absence of cGVHD was the cause of 27 (11%) deaths. Late mortality was attributed to treatment-related causes in 61 patients (25%), including 17 (7%) due to subsequent malignancy, 12 (5%) due to pulmonary complications, 8 (3%) due to cardiac toxicity, and 17 (8.4%) due to other treatment-related sequelae. External causes accounted for late mortality in 7 patients (3%). The cause of death remained undetermined for 23 patients.

Relative to the US population, individuals in this cohort were 3.6 times more likely to have died of a subsequent new malignancy (95% CI, 2.1-5.5). Of the 17 deaths due to subsequent malignancies, 14 were due to solid nonhematopoietic malignancies, and 1 each was due to therapy-related leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and a second malignancy of unknown etiology. The cohort was at a 15.1-fold increased risk of late deaths due to pulmonary dysfunction compared with the general population (95% CI, 7.8-24.9). Pulmonary dysfunction leading to death included interstitial pneumonitis (n = 7, 58%), pulmonary fibrosis (n = 3, 25%), and other lung pathology (n = 2, 17%). The risk of premature death due to cardiac complications was increased 2.3-fold compared with the general population (95% CI, 0.96-4.1).

### Multiple regression analysis for late mortality

Table 4 summarizes the results from the multiple regression analysis for late mortality from any cause, as well as risk of late mortality related to relapse or nonrelapse-related causes (such as cGVHD, vital organ dysfunction, subsequent malignancies, etc).

Table 4

Relative risk of late mortality among 2-year survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

VariablesDeath from any cause
Relapse-related mortality
Nonrelapse-related mortality
Relative risk (95% CI)PRelative risk (95% CI)PRelative risk (95% CI)P
Age at transplantation, y
Younger than 18 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
18 to 45 y 1.31 (0.91-1.89) .1 0.89 (0.49-1.64) .7 1.72 (1.08-2.73) .02
Older than 45 y 2.56 (1.51-4.35) .001 1.43 (0.48-4.24) .5 3.71 (1.97-6.98) <.001
Year of transplantation
1974 to 1979 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
1980 to 1984 0.70 (0.35-1.39) .3 0.33 (0.11-0.98) .05 0.90 (0.37-2.23) .8
1985 to 1989 0.67 (0.32-1.41) .3 0.25 (0.08-0.81) .02 0.95 (0.36-2.51) .9
1990 to 1994 0.71 (0.33-1.55) .4 0.31 (0.09-1.07) .06 0.98 (0.36-2.71) .999
1995 to 1998 0.60 (0.26-1.38) .2 0.22 (0.06-0.88) .03 0.87 (0.30-2.54) .8
Sex
Male 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Female 0.91 (0.70-1.20) .5 0.97 (0.58-1.63) .9 0.89 (0.64-1.22) .5
Donor type
Sibling 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Unrelated 1.39 (0.89-2.17) .1 1.09 (0.47-2.51) .8 1.60 (0.94-2.71) .08
Risk of relapse at HCT
Standard risk 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
High risk 1.69 (1.25-2.27) .001 3.69 (2.18-6.23) <.001 1.23 (0.85-1.78) .3
Race
White 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Hispanic 0.77 (0.51-1.15) .2 0.84 (0.37-1.88) .7 0.71 (0.44-1.12) .1
Other 1.10 (0.68-1.77) .7 2.23 (1.07-4.65) .03 0.77 (0.41-1.44) .4
CGVHD
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 2.26 (1.67-3.06) <.001 1.70 (0.96-2.99) .1 2.68 (1.85-3.87) <.001
Diagnosis
CML 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
AML 1.18 (0.83-1.67) .4 0.79 (0.40-1.55) .5 1.45 (0.96-2.19) .08
NHL 1.22 (0.59-2.51) .6 0.59 (0.11-3.07) .5 1.47 (0.65-3.34) .4
SAA 0.45 (0.17-1.18) .1 — — 0.79 (0.28-2.25) .7
ALL 1.16 (0.76-1.76) .5 1.34 (0.66-2.73) .4 1.03 (0.60-1.75) .9
IEM 1.56 (0.67-3.62) .3 1.21 (0.24-6.03) .8 1.83 (0.67-4.98) .2
Conditioning
Cyclophosphamide
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 1.10 (0.70-1.72) .7 0.79 (0.35-1.78) .6 1.16 (0.67-2.02) .6
TBI
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 0.62 (0.27-1.44) .3 0.16 (0.01-3.03) .2 0.66 (0.26-1.68) .4
Etoposide
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 1.27 (0.77-2.08) .3 0.77 (0.31-1.91) .6 1.50 (0.83-2.73) .2
Busulfan
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 0.66 (0.28-1.55) .3 0.14 (0.01-2.68) .2 0.84 (0.33-2.16) .7
Cytarabine
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 1.29 (0.71-2.34) .4 0.99 (0.36-2.74) .999 1.44 (0.69-3.02) .3
Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis
Methotrexate
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 0.55 (0.38-0.81) .003 0.59 (0.27-1.30) .2 0.52 (0.33-0.82) .005
CSA
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 0.68 (0.45-1.04) .1 0.58 (0.27-1.25) .2 0.70 (0.43-1.16) .2
Prednisone
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 1.07 (0.79-1.45) .7 0.81 (0.46-1.41) .4 1.17 (0.81-1.69) .4
T-cell depletion
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 0.73 (0.37-1.44) .4 1.16 (0.37-3.71) .8 0.55 (0.23-1.33) .2
VariablesDeath from any cause
Relapse-related mortality
Nonrelapse-related mortality
Relative risk (95% CI)PRelative risk (95% CI)PRelative risk (95% CI)P
Age at transplantation, y
Younger than 18 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
18 to 45 y 1.31 (0.91-1.89) .1 0.89 (0.49-1.64) .7 1.72 (1.08-2.73) .02
Older than 45 y 2.56 (1.51-4.35) .001 1.43 (0.48-4.24) .5 3.71 (1.97-6.98) <.001
Year of transplantation
1974 to 1979 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
1980 to 1984 0.70 (0.35-1.39) .3 0.33 (0.11-0.98) .05 0.90 (0.37-2.23) .8
1985 to 1989 0.67 (0.32-1.41) .3 0.25 (0.08-0.81) .02 0.95 (0.36-2.51) .9
1990 to 1994 0.71 (0.33-1.55) .4 0.31 (0.09-1.07) .06 0.98 (0.36-2.71) .999
1995 to 1998 0.60 (0.26-1.38) .2 0.22 (0.06-0.88) .03 0.87 (0.30-2.54) .8
Sex
Male 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Female 0.91 (0.70-1.20) .5 0.97 (0.58-1.63) .9 0.89 (0.64-1.22) .5
Donor type
Sibling 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Unrelated 1.39 (0.89-2.17) .1 1.09 (0.47-2.51) .8 1.60 (0.94-2.71) .08
Risk of relapse at HCT
Standard risk 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
High risk 1.69 (1.25-2.27) .001 3.69 (2.18-6.23) <.001 1.23 (0.85-1.78) .3
Race
White 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Hispanic 0.77 (0.51-1.15) .2 0.84 (0.37-1.88) .7 0.71 (0.44-1.12) .1
Other 1.10 (0.68-1.77) .7 2.23 (1.07-4.65) .03 0.77 (0.41-1.44) .4
CGVHD
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 2.26 (1.67-3.06) <.001 1.70 (0.96-2.99) .1 2.68 (1.85-3.87) <.001
Diagnosis
CML 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
AML 1.18 (0.83-1.67) .4 0.79 (0.40-1.55) .5 1.45 (0.96-2.19) .08
NHL 1.22 (0.59-2.51) .6 0.59 (0.11-3.07) .5 1.47 (0.65-3.34) .4
SAA 0.45 (0.17-1.18) .1 — — 0.79 (0.28-2.25) .7
ALL 1.16 (0.76-1.76) .5 1.34 (0.66-2.73) .4 1.03 (0.60-1.75) .9
IEM 1.56 (0.67-3.62) .3 1.21 (0.24-6.03) .8 1.83 (0.67-4.98) .2
Conditioning
Cyclophosphamide
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 1.10 (0.70-1.72) .7 0.79 (0.35-1.78) .6 1.16 (0.67-2.02) .6
TBI
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 0.62 (0.27-1.44) .3 0.16 (0.01-3.03) .2 0.66 (0.26-1.68) .4
Etoposide
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 1.27 (0.77-2.08) .3 0.77 (0.31-1.91) .6 1.50 (0.83-2.73) .2
Busulfan
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 0.66 (0.28-1.55) .3 0.14 (0.01-2.68) .2 0.84 (0.33-2.16) .7
Cytarabine
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 1.29 (0.71-2.34) .4 0.99 (0.36-2.74) .999 1.44 (0.69-3.02) .3
Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis
Methotrexate
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 0.55 (0.38-0.81) .003 0.59 (0.27-1.30) .2 0.52 (0.33-0.82) .005
CSA
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 0.68 (0.45-1.04) .1 0.58 (0.27-1.25) .2 0.70 (0.43-1.16) .2
Prednisone
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 1.07 (0.79-1.45) .7 0.81 (0.46-1.41) .4 1.17 (0.81-1.69) .4
T-cell depletion
No 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 —
Yes 0.73 (0.37-1.44) .4 1.16 (0.37-3.71) .8 0.55 (0.23-1.33) .2

— indicates not applicable.

The risk of late mortality due to any cause was 2.6-fold increased among individuals older than 45 years at the time of HCT, compared with those who were younger than 18 years; 2.3-fold increased among patients with cGVHD compared with those without cGVHD; and 1.7-fold increased among patients at high risk of relapse at the time of HCT, compared with those at standard risk. On the other hand, the risk of late mortality was significantly reduced among patients who received methotrexate as part of their GVHD prophylaxis regimens compared with those who did not.

Nonrelapse-related late mortality was higher among individuals who were older than 18 years at HCT (18 to 45 years: 1.7-fold; greater than 45 years: 3.7-fold), compared with patients who were younger, anded with patients who were younger, and among patients with cGVHD (2.7-fold increased risk) compared with those without. Finally, the risk of nonrelapse-related mortality was reduced by half among patients who received methotrexate as part of GVHD prophylaxis regimen compared with those who did not.

Relapse-related mortality was 3.7-fold higher in patients at high risk of relapse at HCT, compared with those at standard risk. Patients undergoing HCT after 1980 were less likely to suffer from relapse-related mortality, compared with those who underwent transplantation before 1980.

Multivariate analyses within the primary diagnostic categories of patients disease-free at entry into the cohort (2 years after HCT) are summarized in Table 5.

Table 5

Multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with late mortality by primary diagnosis

Risk factorsRelative risk95% confidence interval
Severe aplastic anemia (all-cause late mortality)
cGVHD 4.0 1.1-14.1
Females 0.2 0.1-0.8
Methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis 0.1 0.01-0.6
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Relapse-related late mortality (high risk of relapse) 3.4 1.2-9.8
Nonrelapse-related late mortality
Methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis 0.2 0.04-0.6
Cyclosporine for GVHD prophylaxis 0.2 0.03-0.9
Acute myeloid leukemia
Relapse-related late mortality
High risk of relapse 7.8 1.7-35.0
cGVHD 5.8 1.7-2.0
Nonrelapse-related late mortality
18 to 45 y at HCT 2.7 1.2-5.9
Older than 45 y at HCT 3.2 1.2-8.9
cGVHD 3.4 1.8-6.3
Chronic myeloid leukemia
Relapse-related late mortality
18 to 45 y at HCT 5.1 1-26.1
Older than 45 y at HCT 15.4 1.6-144.8
High risk of relapse 3.3 1.2-9.1
Nonrelapse-related late mortality (cGVHD) 2.4 1.1-5.1
Risk factorsRelative risk95% confidence interval
Severe aplastic anemia (all-cause late mortality)
cGVHD 4.0 1.1-14.1
Females 0.2 0.1-0.8
Methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis 0.1 0.01-0.6
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Relapse-related late mortality (high risk of relapse) 3.4 1.2-9.8
Nonrelapse-related late mortality
Methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis 0.2 0.04-0.6
Cyclosporine for GVHD prophylaxis 0.2 0.03-0.9
Acute myeloid leukemia
Relapse-related late mortality
High risk of relapse 7.8 1.7-35.0
cGVHD 5.8 1.7-2.0
Nonrelapse-related late mortality
18 to 45 y at HCT 2.7 1.2-5.9
Older than 45 y at HCT 3.2 1.2-8.9
cGVHD 3.4 1.8-6.3
Chronic myeloid leukemia
Relapse-related late mortality
18 to 45 y at HCT 5.1 1-26.1
Older than 45 y at HCT 15.4 1.6-144.8
High risk of relapse 3.3 1.2-9.1
Nonrelapse-related late mortality (cGVHD) 2.4 1.1-5.1

### Marital, employment, and health/life insurance status

The following aspects of the survivors' functional status were examined: marital status, health problems preventing the survivors from holding a job, difficulty in obtaining or retaining health insurance, and difficulty in obtaining or retaining life insurance. The HCT survivors were compared with a sibling cohort to describe the magnitude of problem. Furthermore, sociodemographic and clinical factors were identified among the HCT survivors that would define the group at the highest risk of vulnerability in terms of these 4 variables.

Of the 926 patients in this cohort who were alive and disease-free at 2 years after HCT, and 18 years or older at the time of study participation, 547 (59%) responded to the BMTSS questionnaire. Two hundred fifty-nine patients (28%) declined to participate; and current addresses and telephone numbers were not available for 115 (12%) patients. Thus, 67% of the individuals who were successfully contacted participated in the study. The participants did not differ significantly from the nonparticipants by race/ethnicity, risk of relapse at time of transplantation, or cGVHD status. Participants were more likely to be females (46% vs 39%, P = .05); and older at HCT (30.2 years vs 23.7 years, P < .001) and at study participation (41.5 years vs 36.3 years, P < .001). The median time from transplantation was shorter for participants than nonparticipants (8.6 vs 11.3 years, P < .001). Patients with CML were overrepresented among the participants (38% vs 29%), while those with SAA (10% vs 19%) were underrepresented. Finally, patients who received TBI (85% vs 75%, P < .001) or cyclophosphamide (68% vs 61%, P = .04) were more likely to participate in this study. Three hundred nineteen siblings also completed the BMTSS questionnaire and served as the comparison group. One hundred sixteen (36%) of the siblings were male, and their median age at participation was 44 years (range, 19-79 years). Table 6 summarizes a comparison of the functional well-being between survivors and siblings, and Table 7 describes the factors associated with impaired functional well-being in the cohort of allogeneic HCT survivors.

Table 6

Comparison of functional well-being between survivors and siblings

Functional well-beingSurvivors, no. (%)Siblings, no. (%)P
Currently married*
No 241 (45) 97 (31) —
Yes 300 (55) 220 (69) <.001
Difficulty holding a job
No 435 (81) 311 (98) —
Yes 103 (19) 7 (2) <.001
Difficulty obtaining health insurance
No 392 (74) 299 (95) —
Yes 135 (26) 15 (5) <.001
Currently have health insurance§
No 55 (10) 16 (5) —
Yes 478 (90) 299 (95) .01
Difficulty obtaining life insurance
No 190 (36) 266 (84) —
Yes 156 (30) 16 (5) —
Never tried 183 (34) 35 (11) <.001
Currently have life insurance
No 232 (44) 77 (24) —
Yes 296 (56) 240 (76) d<.001
Functional well-beingSurvivors, no. (%)Siblings, no. (%)P
Currently married*
No 241 (45) 97 (31) —
Yes 300 (55) 220 (69) <.001
Difficulty holding a job
No 435 (81) 311 (98) —
Yes 103 (19) 7 (2) <.001
Difficulty obtaining health insurance
No 392 (74) 299 (95) —
Yes 135 (26) 15 (5) <.001
Currently have health insurance§
No 55 (10) 16 (5) —
Yes 478 (90) 299 (95) .01
Difficulty obtaining life insurance
No 190 (36) 266 (84) —
Yes 156 (30) 16 (5) —
Never tried 183 (34) 35 (11) <.001
Currently have life insurance
No 232 (44) 77 (24) —
Yes 296 (56) 240 (76) d<.001

— indicates not applicable.

*

Six survivors and 2 siblings with missing data were excluded.

Nine survivors and 1 sibling with missing data were excluded.

Twenty survivors and 5 siblings with missing data were excluded.

§

Fourteen survivors and 4 siblings with missing data were excluded.

Eighteen survivors and two siblings with missing data were excluded.

Nineteen survivors and 2 siblings with missing data were excluded.

Table 7

Effects of demographic/treatment factors on survivors' functional well-being

Risk factorsCurrently unmarriedDifficulty holding jobDifficulty obtaining health insuranceLack of health insuranceDifficulty obtaining life insuranceLack of life insurance
Age at hematopoietic cell transplantation, y
Younger than 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
18 to 45 0.16 (0.09-0.28) 0.96 (0.46-2.00) 1.25 (0.68-2.31) 1.88 (0.70-5.04) 2.83 (1.43-5.61) 0.63 (0.36-1.10)
Older than 45 0.10 (0.04-0.22) 1.81 (0.70-4.66) 1.14 (0.45-2.90) 0.87 (0.14-5.21) 2.23 (0.88-5.68) 0.43 (0.18-0.99)
Sex
Male 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Female 1.13 (0.78-1.65) 1.69 (1.06-2.71) 0.83 (0.53-1.28) 0.44 (0.22-0.90) 0.72 (0.47-1.10) 0.95 (0.64-1.43)
Race
White 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hispanic 1.42 (0.88-2.30) 1.77 (0.99-3.16) 0.63 (0.33-1.20) 1.93 (0.87-4.29) 0.86 (0.47-1.58) 1.73 (0.98-3.03)
Other 1.41 (0.73-2.73) 0.98 (0.42-2.32) 0.81 (0.36-1.79) 1.66 (0.55-5.04) 0.84 (0.38-1.86) 1.72 (0.84-3.52)
Education
Less than HS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HS graduate/some college 0.96 (0.58-1.57) 0.92 (0.51-1.68) 1.47 (0.81-2.67) 0.92 (0.39-2.21) 1.23 (0.69-2.20) 0.94 (0.55-1.60)
College graduate 0.96 (0.59-1.57) 0.77 (0.42-1.41) 1.16 (0.65-2.08) 0.83 (0.36-1.88) 1.38 (0.79-2.41) 0.95 (0.57-1.60)
Household income
More than $60 000 — — 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00$20 000 to $60 000 — — 1.10 (0.67-1.81) 6.98 (2.29-21.33) 1.21 (0.76-1.92) 1.78 (1.14-2.78) Less than$20 000 — — 2.65 (1.40-5.00) 12.58 (3.67-43.09) 0.72 (0.37-1.40) 6.21 (3.31-11.67)
Primary diagnosis
CML 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AML 1.04 (0.66-1.65) 0.61 (0.34-1.10) 1.08 (0.63-1.86) 1.40 (0.59-3.30) 0.77 (0.46-1.27) 2.15 (1.31-3.53)
NHL 0.43 (0.14-1.29) 0.51 (0.13-1.97) 3.70 (1.25-10.92) 1.76 (0.19-16.52) 1.87 (0.65-5.38) 0.80 (0.23-2.76)
ALL 1.54 (0.87-2.72) 0.96 (0.47-1.97) 1.32 (0.69-2.51) 1.14 (0.43-3.08) 0.56 (0.29-1.10) 1.46 (0.78-2.70)
AA/IEM 1.04 (0.53-2.03) 1.02 (0.45-2.30) 0.94 (0.42-2.08) 2.79 (1.00-7.78) 0.48 (0.22-1.07) 1.16 (0.57-2.37)
Chronic graft-versus-host disease
No 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 1.19 (0.80-1.76) 3.21 (1.91-5.42) 1.12 (0.71-1.76) 1.01 (0.51-2.02) 1.23 (0.80-1.91) 0.72 (0.47-1.09)
Follow-up time, y
5 y or fewer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
6 to 10 0.71 (0.31-1.63) 1.27 (0.49-3.33) 1.26 (0.46-3.47) 0.98 (0.21-4.52) 1.60 (0.59-4.29) 0.91 (0.37-2.24)
11+ 0.86 (0.27-2.73) 0.69 (0.15-3.12) 1.02 (0.26-4.00) 2.46 (0.38-15.94) 1.95 (0.50-7.66) 0.81 (0.23-2.86)
Risk factorsCurrently unmarriedDifficulty holding jobDifficulty obtaining health insuranceLack of health insuranceDifficulty obtaining life insuranceLack of life insurance
Age at hematopoietic cell transplantation, y
Younger than 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
18 to 45 0.16 (0.09-0.28) 0.96 (0.46-2.00) 1.25 (0.68-2.31) 1.88 (0.70-5.04) 2.83 (1.43-5.61) 0.63 (0.36-1.10)
Older than 45 0.10 (0.04-0.22) 1.81 (0.70-4.66) 1.14 (0.45-2.90) 0.87 (0.14-5.21) 2.23 (0.88-5.68) 0.43 (0.18-0.99)
Sex
Male 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Female 1.13 (0.78-1.65) 1.69 (1.06-2.71) 0.83 (0.53-1.28) 0.44 (0.22-0.90) 0.72 (0.47-1.10) 0.95 (0.64-1.43)
Race
White 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hispanic 1.42 (0.88-2.30) 1.77 (0.99-3.16) 0.63 (0.33-1.20) 1.93 (0.87-4.29) 0.86 (0.47-1.58) 1.73 (0.98-3.03)
Other 1.41 (0.73-2.73) 0.98 (0.42-2.32) 0.81 (0.36-1.79) 1.66 (0.55-5.04) 0.84 (0.38-1.86) 1.72 (0.84-3.52)
Education
Less than HS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HS graduate/some college 0.96 (0.58-1.57) 0.92 (0.51-1.68) 1.47 (0.81-2.67) 0.92 (0.39-2.21) 1.23 (0.69-2.20) 0.94 (0.55-1.60)
College graduate 0.96 (0.59-1.57) 0.77 (0.42-1.41) 1.16 (0.65-2.08) 0.83 (0.36-1.88) 1.38 (0.79-2.41) 0.95 (0.57-1.60)
Household income
More than $60 000 — — 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00$20 000 to $60 000 — — 1.10 (0.67-1.81) 6.98 (2.29-21.33) 1.21 (0.76-1.92) 1.78 (1.14-2.78) Less than$20 000 — — 2.65 (1.40-5.00) 12.58 (3.67-43.09) 0.72 (0.37-1.40) 6.21 (3.31-11.67)
Primary diagnosis
CML 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AML 1.04 (0.66-1.65) 0.61 (0.34-1.10) 1.08 (0.63-1.86) 1.40 (0.59-3.30) 0.77 (0.46-1.27) 2.15 (1.31-3.53)
NHL 0.43 (0.14-1.29) 0.51 (0.13-1.97) 3.70 (1.25-10.92) 1.76 (0.19-16.52) 1.87 (0.65-5.38) 0.80 (0.23-2.76)
ALL 1.54 (0.87-2.72) 0.96 (0.47-1.97) 1.32 (0.69-2.51) 1.14 (0.43-3.08) 0.56 (0.29-1.10) 1.46 (0.78-2.70)
AA/IEM 1.04 (0.53-2.03) 1.02 (0.45-2.30) 0.94 (0.42-2.08) 2.79 (1.00-7.78) 0.48 (0.22-1.07) 1.16 (0.57-2.37)
Chronic graft-versus-host disease
No 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 1.19 (0.80-1.76) 3.21 (1.91-5.42) 1.12 (0.71-1.76) 1.01 (0.51-2.02) 1.23 (0.80-1.91) 0.72 (0.47-1.09)
Follow-up time, y
5 y or fewer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
6 to 10 0.71 (0.31-1.63) 1.27 (0.49-3.33) 1.26 (0.46-3.47) 0.98 (0.21-4.52) 1.60 (0.59-4.29) 0.91 (0.37-2.24)
11+ 0.86 (0.27-2.73) 0.69 (0.15-3.12) 1.02 (0.26-4.00) 2.46 (0.38-15.94) 1.95 (0.50-7.66) 0.81 (0.23-2.86)

Data are odds ratio (95% confidence interval).

— indicates not applicable.

Marital rate (proportion currently married) for the survivors was significantly lower compared with siblings (55% vs 69%, P < .001) (Table 6). Compared with those who underwent transplantation when younger than 18 years, survivors that underwent transplantation at an older age were more likely to be married (Table 7). HCT survivors were 14-fold more likely to report a health problem preventing them from holding a job compared with siblings (19% vs 2%, [Table 6]). Presence of cGVHD (OR = 3.2; 95% CI, 1.9-5.4), and female sex (OR-1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7) were associated with difficulty in holding a job (Table 7).

HCT survivors were 7-fold more likely to report difficulty in obtaining or retaining health insurance (26% vs 5%, P < .001 [Table 6]), and low annual household income (< $20 000) was associated with difficulty in obtaining health insurance (OR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4-5.0). However, 90% of the survivors did report health insurance coverage at the time of study participation, although the comparable rate was higher in siblings (95%, P = .01). Factors associated with lack of current health insurance included male sex (OR = 2.3) and low annual household income (<$20 000: OR = 13; $20 000-$60 000: OR = 7.0; Table 7).

A significantly greater proportion of HCT survivors reported difficulty in obtaining or retaining life insurance compared with siblings (30% vs 5%, P < .001) and the survivors were 10-fold more likely to report difficulty in obtaining or retaining life health insurance (Table 6). Age at HCT older than 18 years (18 to 45 years: OR = 2.8; older than 45 years: OR = 2.2) was associated with difficulty in obtaining life insurance. Only 56% of the survivors had life insurance at study participation, compared with 76% of the siblings (P < .001). Younger age at HCT (< 18: OR = 2.3) and low annual household income (< $20 000: RR = 1.8;$20 000-\$60 000: OR = 6.2) were factors independently associated with lack of current life insurance (Table 7).

## Discussion

Our goal was to use the services offered by the NDI, and the SSDI12  to complement the patient medical records and provide a comprehensive description of the late mortality experience in patients undergoing allogeneic HCT. The NDI is a central computerized index of death record information submitted under contractual agreement to the National Center for Health Statistics by the state vital statistics offices. The Social Security Administration Death master file is a database containing death notices for enrollees in the US Social Security program. With this study, we were able to identify allogeneic HC transplant recipients who would be at increased risk of experiencing late mortality, thus setting the stage for targeted interventions.

This study demonstrates that patients with ALL, AML, CML, NHL, SAA, and IEM who survive disease-free for 2 years after allogeneic HCT have a conditional probability of surviving for 5 years after transplantation of 90%, and for surviving 15 years after HCT of 80%. These results are consistent with those from a large International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) study of patients with ALL, AML, CML, and SAA who were disease-free 2 years after allogeneic HCT; this study revealed that the probability of surviving for 7 years after transplantation was 89%.3

The current study also demonstrates that the cohort was at a 10-fold increased risk of experiencing late mortality compared with the general population. Of note, the mortality rate continued to be significantly increased compared with the general population among those who had survived 15 years after allogeneic transplantation. High relative mortality was observed in the youngest patients, and those with IEM. This probably could be a reflection of the low expected mortality in the age- and sex-matched general population.

In the current study, among patients who were disease-free 2 years after allogeneic HCT, 18% experienced late mortality. Twenty-nine percent of these deaths were due to relapse of the primary disease, accounting for the largest single cause of death in this population. Relapse-related mortality was significantly higher (3.7-fold) in patients at high risk of relapse at HCT, for the entire cohort, as well as in patients diagnosed with ALL (3.4-fold), AML (7.8-fold), or CML (3.3-fold), compared with those at standard risk of relapse.

As has been reported in earlier studies,3,13  cGVHD was the chief cause of nonrelapse-related death. The 10-year survival probability with and without cGVHD in this cohort was 79.8% vs 89.5% for CML, 73.2% vs 91.8% for AML, 80.9% vs 86.2% for ALL, 65.2% vs 80.0% for NHL, and 72.2% vs 90.5% for IEM. Furthermore, nonrelapse-related mortality was increased in patients with CML (2.4-fold) or AML (3.4-fold) with cGVHD compared with those without cGVHD. Use of methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis was associated with a reduction in nonrelapse-related mortality, primarily due to a reduction in cGVHD. Methotrexate was one of the primary agents used for GVH prophylaxis during the period covered by the cohort (1974 to 1998). The association of methotrexate with a reduction in nonrelapse-related mortality therefore probably represents a surrogate indicator for effective GVH prophylaxis. Late infection in the absence of cGVHD accounted for 11% of premature deaths, again emphasizing the need for recognizing and treating infections effectively and aggressively in this population that is at risk for prolonged periods of immune suppression.

The incidence of subsequent cancer among survivors of transplantation is known to be significantly higher than that of the general population.14-20  The risk is related to exposure to radiation and chemotherapy; presence of GVHD; and use of antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine for management of GVHD.14-18,20  The current study describes the mortality experience of allogeneic HC transplant recipients after being diagnosed with a subsequent cancer, and demonstrates that the risk was 3.5-fold increased, compared with the general population. The increased risk was seen primarily among patients with AML, CML, and ALL.

Chronic pulmonary complications affect at least 15% to 20% of patients after HCT, and pulmonary dysfunction is an important indicator for long-term outcome.21,22  The current cohort was at a 15-fold increased risk of late deaths due to pulmonary dysfunction compared with the general population, again emphasizing the need for preventive measures, such as limiting cumulative therapeutic exposure to agents with potential pulmonary toxicity, early and aggressive interventions in patients with pulmonary compromise, and caution against tobacco use in this vulnerable population.

An assessment of the long-term survival after allogeneic HCT must take into consideration the quality of the survival. Although there are several reports describing survival, few studies report the functional well-being and social reintegration of adult survivors of allogeneic HCT.4-7  Duell et al conducted a retrospective study on health and social reintegration in long-term survivors of allogeneic HCT, demonstrating that reduced clinical performance (as measured by Karnofsky score) is associated with cGVHD and relapse of primary disease.4  The study demonstrated that 89% of the survivors had returned to full-time work or school, and only 6% were unable to go to work or school. Factors associated with absence from work or school included older age, female sex, diagnosis of CML, presence of cGVHD, second cancer, and relapse of primary disease. In the current study, 19% of the survivors reported that health problems kept them from holding a job or attending school—a proportion that was significantly higher compared with sibling controls. Patients with cGVHD and female survivors were more likely to report difficulties in returning to work or school due to health problems.

Although previous investigations of the insurance coverage of survivors of childhood cancer found clear evidence of discrimination, particularly in employment-related health insurance,23-25  more recent studies of older survivors treated according to contemporary protocols indicate improved access to insurance and less economic discrimination,24,25  probably because of public awareness of the improved prognosis and because of legislation prohibiting discrimination in employment and promoting insurance portability. The current study aimed to identify the challenges faced by long-term survivors in reintegrating back into society after a high-intensity treatment regimen (ie, hematopoietic cell transplantation). The study describes that although the HCT survivors are significantly more likely to report difficulty in obtaining or retaining health insurance compared with siblings, the large majority (ie, 90%) does have health insurance. However, there is considerably greater difficulty in obtaining or retaining life insurance and only 56% of the HCT survivors had life insurance at study participation, while the comparable figure is 76% in siblings. The study also describes subpopulations that are most vulnerable in terms of difficulty in obtaining or retaining health or life insurance. However, the study did not evaluate in detail the challenges in obtaining or retaining health or life insurance faced by the survivors, and is therefore not geared to comment on the insurability of HCT survivors. On the other hand, this study aims to increase the awareness of the health care providers, policy makers, and third-party payers of the challenges faced by the long-term HCT survivors. It also sets the stage for further evaluation of the specific causes of lack of insurance in this population, as well as identification of high-risk populations that would benefit from interventions.

In conclusion, for several years after allogeneic transplantation, mortality rates in survivors remain higher than those expected in the general population, and the long-term survivors are at risk for disease- and treatment-related sequelae. This study extends the survival data, to describe specific aspects of functional well-being such as marital status, employment, and problems with health and life insurance experienced by long-term survivors of allogeneic HCT. To prevent and treat life-threatening late events, and to continue to address issues that impact the quality of survival, life-long follow-up of patients who undergo transplantation is recommended.

An Inside Blood analysis of this article appears at the front of this issue.

## Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute (R01 CA078938 and PO1 CA 30206 to S.B.), the Leukemia Lymphoma Society (2192 to S.B.), and the National Institutes of Health (K23 CA85503–01 to K.S.B.).

National Institutes of Health

## Authorship

Contribution: S.B. designed the study, supervised and performed the research, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper; L.F. performed the research and analyzed data; A.C. performed the research and analyzed data; C-L.S. performed the analysis and helped write the paper; and K.S.B., J.G.G., P.B.M., A.N., M.O., N.K.C.R., L.L.R., D.S., A.S., S.J.F., and D.J.W. provided critical insight in the interpretation of data.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: S. Bhatia, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010-3000; e-mail:sbhatia@coh.org.

## References

1
Horowitz

MM
Blume

KG
Forman

S
Appelbaum

ER
Uses and growth of hematopoietic cell transplantation.
Thomas' Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
2004
Malden, MA
Blackwell Publishing
(pg.
9
-
15
)
2
Gluckman

E
Socie

G
Claisse

JP
Hirsch

I
Long term results of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.
Bone Marrow Transplant
1993
, vol.
12

suppl 4
(pg.
S13
-
S15
)
3
Socie

G
Veum-Stone

J
Wingard

JR
, et al.
Long term survival and late deaths after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.
N Engl J Med
1999
, vol.
341
(pg.
14
-
21
)
4
Duell

T
van Lint

MT
Ljungman

P
, et al.
Health and functional status of long-term survivors of bone marrow transplantation: EBMT Working Party on Late Effects and EULEP Study Group on Late Effects, European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
Ann Intern Med
1997
, vol.
126
(pg.
184
-
192
)
5
Andrykowski

M
Henslee

PJ
Farrall

MG
Physical and psychological functioning of adult survivors of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.
Bone Marrow Transplant
1989
, vol.
4
(pg.
75
-
81
)
6
Andrykowski

M
Henslee

PJ
Barnett

RL
The quality of life in adult survivors of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: correlates and comparison with matched renal transplant recipients.
Transplantation
1990
, vol.
50
(pg.
399
-
406
)
7
Wingard

JR
Curbow

B
Baker

F

S
Health, functional status, and employment of adult survivors of bone marrow transplantation.
Ann Int Med
1991
, vol.
114
(pg.
113
-
118
)
8
Marsh

G
Ehland

J
Sefcik

S
Youk

A
Mortality and Population Data System.
2000
Pittsburgh, PA
University of Pittsburgh
9
Breslow

N
Day

N
Statistical methods in cancer research: IARC Workshop 25-27 May 1983.
IARC Sci Publ
1987
, vol.
82
(pg.
1
-
406
)
10
Vandenbroucke

JP
A shortcut method for calculating the 95 percent confidence interval of the standard mortality ratio.
Am J Epidemiol
1982
, vol.
115
(pg.
303
-
304
)
11
Cox

DR
Regression models and life tables.
J R Stat Soc
1972
, vol.
834
(pg.
187
-
220
)
12
Curb

JD
Ford

CE
Pressel

S
, et al.
Ascertainment of vital status through the National Death Index and the Social Security Administration.
Am J Epidemiol
1985
, vol.
121
(pg.
754
-
766
)
13
Deeg

HJ
Leisenring

W
Storb

R
, et al.
Long-term outcome after marrow transplantation for severed aplastic anemia.
Blood
1998
, vol.
91
(pg.
3637
-
3645
)
14
Witherspoon

RP
Fisher

LD
Schnoch

G
, et al.
Secondary cancers after bone marrow transplantation for leukemia or aplastic anemia.
N Engl J Med
1989
, vol.
321
(pg.
784
-
789
)
15
Socie

G
Curtis

RE
Deeg

HJ
, et al.
New malignant diseases after allogeneic marrow transplantation for childhood acute leukemia.
J Clin Oncol
2000
, vol.
18
(pg.
348
-
357
)
16
Socie

G
Henry-Amar

M
Bacigalupo

A
, et al.
Malignant tumors after treatment of aplastic anemia: European Bone Marrow Transplantation-Severe Aplastic Anaemia Working Party.
N Engl J Med
1993
, vol.
329
(pg.
1152
-
1157
)
17
Bhatia

S
Ramsay

K
Steinbuch

M
, et al.
Malignant neoplasms following bone marrow transplantation.
Blood
1996
, vol.
87
(pg.
3633
-
3639
)
18
Krishnan

A
Bhatia

S
Slovak

ML
, et al.
Predictors of therapy-related leukemia and myelodysplasia following autologous transplantation for lymphoma: an assessment of risk factors.
Blood
2000
, vol.
95
(pg.
1588
-
1593
)
19
Metayer

C
Curtis

RE
Vose

JM
Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia after autotransplantation for lymphoma: a multcenter case-control study.
Blood
2003
, vol.
101
(pg.
2015
-
2023
)
20
Bhatia

S
Louie

A
Bhatia

R
, et al.
Solid cancers after bone marrow transplantation.
J Clin Oncol
2001
, vol.
19
(pg.
464
-
471
)
21
Flowers ME

D
Deeg

HJ
Blume

KG
Forman

S
Appelbaum

ER
Delayed complications after hematopoietic cell transplantation.
Thomas' Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
2004
Malden, MA
Blackwell Publishing
(pg.
944
-
961
)
22
Kreisman

H
Kolkove

N
Pulmonary toxicity of antineoplastic therapy.
Semin Oncol
1992
, vol.
19
(pg.
508
-
520
)
23
Holme

GE
Baker

A
Hassanein

RS
, et al.
The availability of insurance to long-term survivors of childhood cancer.
Cancer
1986
, vol.
57
(pg.
190
-
193
)
24
Green

DM
Zevon

MA
Hall

B
Achievement of life goals by adult survivors of modern treatment for childhood cancer.
Cancer
1991
, vol.
67
(pg.
206
-
213
)
25
Hays

DM
Landsverk

J
Sallan

SE
, et al.
Educational, occupational, and insurance status of childhood cancer survivors in their fourth and fifth decades of life.
J Clin Oncol
1992
, vol.
10
(pg.
1397
-
1406
)